Assam
Barak Valley inside the inner line of Reserve Forest, Hailkandi
,
Geleky Forest Reserve
,
Sivasagar
Published : 12 July, 2014   |   Last updated - 24 Jun, 2024
28 hectares of forest land diverted for commando camp in Assam
Reported by
Sarup Sinha
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Updated by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People Affected
2024
Year started
28
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2024
Year started
28
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Defence and Security Establishments
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In Assam, 28 hectares of forest land in Sivasagar district’s Geleky Forest Reserve at the Assam-Nagaland border has been diverted for the construction of second Assam Commando Battalion Camp.

The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has sent notices to various authorities, including the Assam government, the Assam Forest Department, the Union Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change (MoEFCC), the District Commissioner of Sivasagar, and the Divisional Forest Officer in response to a petition filed by environmental activist Rohit Choudhury. The petitioner claimed that MK Yadava, the former Principal Chief Conservator of Forests and Head of Forest Force in Assam, unlawfully redirected 28 hectares of forest land for construction of second Assam Commando Battalion Camp in the Geleky Forest Reserve.
 
The plea stated that Yadava, now the Special Chief Secretary (Forests) for Assam, misused “his power and position to illegally divert a large part of the forest area without fulfilling the requirements of Compensatory Afforestation and Net Present Value, which makes him personally liable for compensating and restoring the damage done to the forest.”
 
As per the petition, the diversion violates the Van (Sanrakshan Evam Samvardhan) Adhiniyam, 1980 and the latest guidelines of the Central Government dated 29 December, 2023. According to the Forest (Conservation) Law, 1980, diversion of forest land for activities unrelated to forestry must receive prior approval from the MoEFCC.
 
In an order dated 29 May 2024, the NGT ordered the formation of a committee to investigate these claims, highlighting that the issue involves significant environmental concerns and potential violations of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. The committee includes the Additional Director General of Forests from the MoEFCC, an Additional Secretary nominated by the MoEFCC Secretary, and the Deputy Director General of Forests(C) from the MoEFCC's Integrated Regional Office in Meghalaya.

Meanwhile, the NGT's New Delhi bench is hearing another case of illegal diversion of protected forest land. In January 2024, the NGT bench had taken up a suo-moto case concerning the purported illegal use of 44 hectares of protected forest land for establishing the Assam Police's Commando Battalion near the Assam-Mizoram border in Inner Line Reserve Forest, Hailakandi district. In this case too, Yadava had allegedly approved the construction within a protected forest, reportedly to prevent encroachment by individuals from Mizoram. This decision incited significant concern among local conservationists.
 
Consequently, on 28 March 2024, the Union Ministry of Environment acknowledged that the battalion's construction violated the Forest Conservation Amendment Act. The Assam government subsequently informed the NGT that it had stopped the construction of the commando camp on the 44 hectares in Hailakandi. 

The MoEFCC regional office in Shillong gave a show cause notice to MK Yadava on 14 May 2024. The notice declared him guilty of the offense and gave him 60 days to respond, failing which legal action would be taken. 

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Author
Reported by
Sarup Sinha

Assam

Kumar Sambhav is a social entrepreneur and award-winning journalist, leading innovative research in accountability investigations. He is the founder of Land Conflict Watch and is currently working as India Research Lead with Princeton University’s Digital Witness Lab.

Read More

Latest updates
Rajasthan
Rajasthan

UIT Bikaner's Jorbeer Housing Project on Stalls Following Rajasthan High Court Order

Rajasthan
Rajasthan

Jaipur Development Authority Acquires Land for Township Project, Ending Conflict

Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh

Farmers land acquired under Mansarovar Housing Scheme in Lucknow

Maharashtra
Maharashtra

Citizens unite against cycle track around Powai, Vihar Lakes in Mumbai

Jharkhand
Jharkhand

Families displaced by Mandal Dam in Jharkhand opppose project resumption

Jharkhand
Jharkhand

Jharkhand approves Adani's thermal plant, farmers allege violation of LARR Act

Gujarat
Gujarat

Pastoral Community in Gujarat's Banni Grasslands Demands Titles Recognising Community Forest Rights

Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh

Builder Encroaches Upon Farmers Land in Gosaiganj Lucknow, 150 Allottees in Lurch

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Complaint against procedural violations

28 hectares of forest land diverted for commando camp in Assam

Reported by

Sarup Sinha

Legal Review by

Sourabh Rai, Anmol Gupta

Edited by

Anupa Sagar Kujur

Updated by

Updated by

Published on

September 17, 2024

September 18, 2024

Edited on

September 17, 2024

Sector

Infrastructure

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Defence and Security Establishments

Starting Year

2024

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

28

ha

Households Affected by Conflict

People Affected by Conflict

State

Assam

Sector

Infrastructure

People Affected by Conflict

Households Affected by Conflict

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

28

ha

Starting Year

2024

Location of Conflict

Geleky Forest Reserve

Barak Valley inside the inner line of Reserve Forest, Hailkandi

Sivasagar

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Defence and Security Establishments

Land Conflict Summary

In Assam, 28 hectares of forest land in Sivasagar district’s Geleky Forest Reserve at the Assam-Nagaland border has been diverted for the construction of second Assam Commando Battalion Camp.

The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has sent notices to various authorities, including the Assam government, the Assam Forest Department, the Union Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change (MoEFCC), the District Commissioner of Sivasagar, and the Divisional Forest Officer in response to a petition filed by environmental activist Rohit Choudhury. The petitioner claimed that MK Yadava, the former Principal Chief Conservator of Forests and Head of Forest Force in Assam, unlawfully redirected 28 hectares of forest land for construction of second Assam Commando Battalion Camp in the Geleky Forest Reserve.
 
The plea stated that Yadava, now the Special Chief Secretary (Forests) for Assam, misused “his power and position to illegally divert a large part of the forest area without fulfilling the requirements of Compensatory Afforestation and Net Present Value, which makes him personally liable for compensating and restoring the damage done to the forest.”
 
As per the petition, the diversion violates the Van (Sanrakshan Evam Samvardhan) Adhiniyam, 1980 and the latest guidelines of the Central Government dated 29 December, 2023. According to the Forest (Conservation) Law, 1980, diversion of forest land for activities unrelated to forestry must receive prior approval from the MoEFCC.
 
In an order dated 29 May 2024, the NGT ordered the formation of a committee to investigate these claims, highlighting that the issue involves significant environmental concerns and potential violations of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. The committee includes the Additional Director General of Forests from the MoEFCC, an Additional Secretary nominated by the MoEFCC Secretary, and the Deputy Director General of Forests(C) from the MoEFCC's Integrated Regional Office in Meghalaya.

Meanwhile, the NGT's New Delhi bench is hearing another case of illegal diversion of protected forest land. In January 2024, the NGT bench had taken up a suo-moto case concerning the purported illegal use of 44 hectares of protected forest land for establishing the Assam Police's Commando Battalion near the Assam-Mizoram border in Inner Line Reserve Forest, Hailakandi district. In this case too, Yadava had allegedly approved the construction within a protected forest, reportedly to prevent encroachment by individuals from Mizoram. This decision incited significant concern among local conservationists.
 
Consequently, on 28 March 2024, the Union Ministry of Environment acknowledged that the battalion's construction violated the Forest Conservation Amendment Act. The Assam government subsequently informed the NGT that it had stopped the construction of the commando camp on the 44 hectares in Hailakandi. 

The MoEFCC regional office in Shillong gave a show cause notice to MK Yadava on 14 May 2024. The notice declared him guilty of the offense and gave him 60 days to respond, failing which legal action would be taken. 

Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Type of Common Land

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Legal Data

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Legislations/Policies Involved

Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
Section 2 [No state government can pass orders de-reserving a reserved forest or allow forestland to be used for non-forest purpose without prior approval of the Union government]
Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006
Section 2 [Projects or activities falling under Category-A of the Schedule shall require prior environmental clearance from the concerned regulatory authority, that is the Central Government in the Ministry of Environment and Forest]
Forest (Conservation) Rules, 2003
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

No

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Violation of environmental laws

Non-consultation with stakeholders

Legal Status:

In Court

Status of Case In Court

Pending

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

No

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

National Green Tribunal (Eastern Zone)

Case Number

Original Application No.105/2024/EZ

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

The NGT (Eastern Zone) is reviewing a case where Assam's Forest Department allegedly diverted 28 hectares of reserve forest without approval from the MoEF&CC. The NGT stated that it is not up to Assam's PCCF (Principal Chief Conservator Of Forest) to decide if large constructions for 800 armed personnel would affect forest conservation. According to Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, such decisions must be made by the Central Government. There is nothing on record to show that there is any permission or sanction granted by the Central Government for diversion of forest land. The next date of hearing is on 04.10.2024.

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

No items found.

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

State Of Assam, Department Of Environment and Forest, Assam, Ministry Of Environment, Forest & Climate Change, Office of the District Commissioner, Sivasagar, Divisional Forest Officer, Sivasagar Division

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Resources

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Images

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Video

Other Land Conflicts in Assam

cross
    Not a member yet?
    Sign up now
    Conflicts Map
    Conflict Database
    About Us