Madhya Pradesh
,
Isagarh
,
Ashoknagar
Published :
Jan 2026
|
Updated :
Anti-encroachment and seasonal cultivation: The Isagarh mustard crop clearance and tribal claims to forest land
Reported by
Taskeen Khan
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Rakshit Dhingra
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
2025
Year started
6.53
ha.
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2025
Year started
6.53
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Encroachment by Non-Right Holders (Other than Caste-based)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Unclassifed
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Encroachment by Non-Right Holders (Other than Caste-based)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

On 9 December 2025, the Madhya Pradesh Forest Department carried out an anti-encroachment drive and removed mustard crop cultivated by local tribal communities over 6.529 hectares of land in the Isagarh area of Ashoknagar district.

Around 50 forest personnel, including Shivpuri Forest Conservator Adarsh ​​Srivastava, Divisional Forest Officer Pratibha Ahirwar, and Sub-Divisional Officer SP Shakya were present at the site during the drive. Two JCB machines were used to flatten the standing mustard crops cultivated by tribal families on the "encroached" land.

While the Forest Department officials stated that the land fell within the notified forest boundary and agricultural activities were not authorised in the area, the tribals said that they had been using the land for cultivation for several years and that the land formed an essential part of their seasonal livelihood. A resident of Dhakoni village near Isagarh told LCW on condition of anonymity that the tribals alleged that they were not given adequate notice or an opportunity to verify or contest the department’s classification. The affected farmers also expressed concern over the loss of their crop as many farming households depend on mustard cultivation for income and subsistence.

According to a news report, some tribal families had constructed temporary huts on the forest land and begun cultivating the land without legal authorisation. Eviction notices were reportedly issued earlier, but the tribals continued to stay and cultivate the area. When they sowed mustard in the field, the official decided to take strict action considering the seriousness of the matter.

Officials said that any kind of occupation or cultivation on forest land is completely illegal, making this action necessary. They added that the drive was part of a broader movement to reclaim encroached land.

The incident highlights the need for a more balanced approach, one that protects the environment while also respecting the constitutional rights of Scheduled Tribes.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Other environmental services, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Madhya Pradesh Forest Department

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Tribal cultivators in the Isagarh area of Ashoknagar district

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Taskeen Khan
Taskeen is an environmentalist and entrepreneur with a solid academic foundation from the National Institute of Technology and the University of California, Los Angeles. Holding a Master of Science in Environmental Science and a Master of Technology in Remote Sensing and GIS, she has combined her technical expertise with real-world experience at organisations like Google, ParkMe Inc., Santa Monica, and Global Citizen Year. Currently, she leads a sustainability-focused firm, aiming to create impactful solutions for a greener future.
Show more work
Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Other environmental services, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us