Nagaland
Tsithrongse
,
Diezephe
,
Chumukedima
Published : 12 July, 2014   |   Last updated - 24 Jun, 2024
Tension flares up in Nagaland's Tsithrongse and Diezephe after villagers clash over land dispute
Reported by
Emilo Yanthan
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Updated by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People Affected
2024
Year started
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2024
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Communal/Ethnic Conflict
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Tension gripped the villages of Diezephe and Tsithrongse in Nagaland after residents of both the villages engaged in destruction of public and private properties and arson on 10 February 2024 over an old land dispute.

Situated within the administrative purview of Chümoukedima district, approximately 15 kilometres southwest of Dimapur, these two communities have long grappled with conflicting claims over specific territories. Despite being divided by the Public Works Department (PWD) road, contention arises over certain areas purportedly contested by both villages.

According to a report, people from Diezephe village alleged that individuals from Tsithrongse village arrived with arms and destroyed properties within Diezephe village boundaries amidst a contentious land dispute. The alleged vandalism included the demolition of resting sheds, cultivation areas, houses, etc. They also fired shots in the air. Following which, residents of Diezephe village reportedly retaliated and burnt down houses in Tsithrongse village.

A source from Police department stated, “There was no physical confrontation between the two parties but both the parties took to destroying the other’s property on lands claimed by both. The two villages are separated by the PWD road but there are disputed areas on one side. It is a long pending village border dispute. Only the revenue department will have an idea about the demarcation, if there are records.”

Following fresh tension, Commissioner of Police Dimapur, Kevithuto Sophie, imposed Section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) within both the villages._ _This directive took effect at 6 pm on 10 February 2024 and it was revoked on 11 March 2024.  

Furthermore, the Commissioner of Police, Dimapur, also issued additional directives to the residents of both villages to deposit all licensed arms.

On 12 February 2024, Deputy Commissioner (DC) Chümoukedima, Abhinav Shivam, met the representatives from two villages, Tenyimia Union Dimapur (TUD) and Eastern Nagaland People’s Union Dimapur (ENPUD), and directed both the villages to maintain status quo. The DC further said that that the leaders of two villages would engage their communities and come together for future discussions with regard to the ongoing legal proceedings and the importance of peaceful conflict resolution._ _

The matter of reported gunfire during the incident has been referred to law enforcement authorities for investigation.

Earlier in 2015, residents of Tsithrongse village had approached Gauhati High Court regarding a boundary dispute with neighbouring Selouphe village council. However, the High Court noted that the case at hand involved a factual determination of the disputed land. The Court directed the deputy commissioner of the district to carry out an enquiry.

Meanwhile, a peace committee has been established to address the "35 years long dispute" between Diezephe and Tsithrongse villages. The committee was formed during a meeting of Tenyimi Union Dimapur (TUD) and Eastern Nagaland People’s Union Dimapur (ENPUD) on 28 February 2024. Five members each from the two villages are part of the committee.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Non-agri rural enterprise, Residential area, Commercial

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Author
Reported by
Emilo Yanthan

Nagaland

Kumar Sambhav is a social entrepreneur and award-winning journalist, leading innovative research in accountability investigations. He is the founder of Land Conflict Watch and is currently working as India Research Lead with Princeton University’s Digital Witness Lab.

Read More

Latest updates
Arunachal Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh

Hydroelectric projects on Subansiri river continue despite public outcry, disasters, and persistent floods

Gujarat
Gujarat

Farmers divided over Mandal-Becharaji Special Investment region in Gujarat

Gujarat
Gujarat

Farmers protest against GIDC in Gujarat, demand promised jobs, compensation

Goa
Goa

Proposed construction in Goa village blocks residents' access to agricultural fields, river

Assam
Assam

Violence erupts in Dhemaji amid ongoing Assam-Arunachal border dispute

Odisha
Odisha

Odisha's Dungripali village protests Aditya Birla solar power project

Assam
Assam

Illegal coal mining continues to thrive in Assam's Tinsukia

Assam
Assam

5 Cops Killed, 60 Civilians Injured in Firing between Assam, Mizoram Police

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Tension flares up in Nagaland's Tsithrongse and Diezephe after villagers clash over land dispute

Reported by

Emilo Yanthan

Legal Review by

Anmol Gupta

Edited by

Anupa Sagar Kujur

Updated by

Updated by

Published on

May 1, 2024

May 16, 2024

Edited on

May 1, 2024

Sector

Land Use

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Communal/Ethnic Conflict

Starting Year

2024

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

ha

Households Affected by Conflict

People Affected by Conflict

State

Nagaland

Sector

Land Use

People Affected by Conflict

Households Affected by Conflict

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

ha

Starting Year

2024

Location of Conflict

Diezephe

Tsithrongse

Chumukedima

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Communal/Ethnic Conflict

Land Conflict Summary

Tension gripped the villages of Diezephe and Tsithrongse in Nagaland after residents of both the villages engaged in destruction of public and private properties and arson on 10 February 2024 over an old land dispute.

Situated within the administrative purview of Chümoukedima district, approximately 15 kilometres southwest of Dimapur, these two communities have long grappled with conflicting claims over specific territories. Despite being divided by the Public Works Department (PWD) road, contention arises over certain areas purportedly contested by both villages.

According to a report, people from Diezephe village alleged that individuals from Tsithrongse village arrived with arms and destroyed properties within Diezephe village boundaries amidst a contentious land dispute. The alleged vandalism included the demolition of resting sheds, cultivation areas, houses, etc. They also fired shots in the air. Following which, residents of Diezephe village reportedly retaliated and burnt down houses in Tsithrongse village.

A source from Police department stated, “There was no physical confrontation between the two parties but both the parties took to destroying the other’s property on lands claimed by both. The two villages are separated by the PWD road but there are disputed areas on one side. It is a long pending village border dispute. Only the revenue department will have an idea about the demarcation, if there are records.”

Following fresh tension, Commissioner of Police Dimapur, Kevithuto Sophie, imposed Section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) within both the villages._ _This directive took effect at 6 pm on 10 February 2024 and it was revoked on 11 March 2024.  

Furthermore, the Commissioner of Police, Dimapur, also issued additional directives to the residents of both villages to deposit all licensed arms.

On 12 February 2024, Deputy Commissioner (DC) Chümoukedima, Abhinav Shivam, met the representatives from two villages, Tenyimia Union Dimapur (TUD) and Eastern Nagaland People’s Union Dimapur (ENPUD), and directed both the villages to maintain status quo. The DC further said that that the leaders of two villages would engage their communities and come together for future discussions with regard to the ongoing legal proceedings and the importance of peaceful conflict resolution._ _

The matter of reported gunfire during the incident has been referred to law enforcement authorities for investigation.

Earlier in 2015, residents of Tsithrongse village had approached Gauhati High Court regarding a boundary dispute with neighbouring Selouphe village council. However, the High Court noted that the case at hand involved a factual determination of the disputed land. The Court directed the deputy commissioner of the district to carry out an enquiry.

Meanwhile, a peace committee has been established to address the "35 years long dispute" between Diezephe and Tsithrongse villages. The committee was formed during a meeting of Tenyimi Union Dimapur (TUD) and Eastern Nagaland People’s Union Dimapur (ENPUD) on 28 February 2024. Five members each from the two villages are part of the committee.

Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Type of Common Land

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Non-agri rural enterprise, Residential area, Commercial

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Legal Data

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Legislations/Policies Involved

Nagaland Village and Area Councils Act, 1978
Section 3 [Every recognized village in the State to have a village council], Section 14 [The village council has the power to administer justice within the village territory. In case of disputes between villages falling in different areas or district, the village councils may settle the dispute in a joint session or refer to the appropriate authority]
Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 425 [This section criminalizes mischief, i.e., the intent to cause damage to any person or cause damage to any property.]; Section 435 [Under this section, arson is a punishable offence]; Section 441 [This section defines criminal trespass on the property of another]; 
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Lack of legal protection over land rights

Legal Status:

Out of Court

Status of Case In Court

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

No

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Case Number

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

Torching of houses

Reported Details of the Violation:

It is claimed that the incident led to the damage of several properties such as vandalism of cemeteries, village signboards, gates, market sheds, and burning of a house.

Date of Violation

February 9, 2024

Location of Violation

Diezephe and Tsithrongse

Additional Information

Nature of Protest

Complaints/petitions/letters/memorandums to officials

Property damage/arson

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

District administration of Chumoukedima, Police Department, Dimapur

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Diezephe Village Council, Tsithrongse Village Council

Complaints/petitions/letters/memorandums to officials
Property damage/arson

Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Resources

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Images

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Video

NLTV

Other Land Conflicts in Nagaland

cross
    Not a member yet?
    Sign up now