Madhya Pradesh
,
Anjad
,
Barwani
Published :
Mar 2026
|
Updated :
Agricultural livelihood and mining expansion: Villagers, leaseholders tussle over land demarcation in Barwani, Madhya Pradesh
Reported by
Taskeen Khan
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Rakshit Dhingra, Amrita Chekkutty
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
5
Households affected
24
People affected
2025
Year started
ha.
Land area affected
5
Households affected
24
People Affected
2025
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Other Kind of Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Unclassifed
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Other Kind of Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In May 2025, a violent land conflict erupted in the Barwani district of Madhya Pradesh over the land allocation for a ballast mining lease. The incident occurred during an official land demarcation exercise conducted in the presence of revenue officials and police personnel. A confrontation between villagers and leaseholders escalated into violence, following which, the police intervened to restore order. The demarcation exercise was met with strong resistance from local villagers, who claimed that they had been cultivating the land for several years and depended on it for their livelihood.

According to news reports, the land in question is recorded as government land and had been formally allotted for ballast mining. However, villagers stated that irrespective its official classification, the land had been used for agriculture by local farmers for a long time. They objected to the demarcation process, arguing that it threatened to dispossess them of cultivated fields without prior consultation or resolution of their claims. The situation escalated when leaseholders and their supporters confronted the villagers at the demarcation site.

Villagers chased and allegedly assaulted leaseholder representatives using sticks and stones, while leaseholders were also accused of provoking and engaging in physical confrontation. The clash resulted in injuries on both sides. Visuals from the scene show chaos, people running, shouting, and engaging in physical scuffles, with police personnel eventually intervening to control the situation.

Officials maintained that the demarcation was being carried out as per legal procedures as the land had already been designated for mining through official channels. They stated that the land belonged to the government and that the leaseholder had the right to begin mining operations following demarcation. On the other hand, villagers reiterated that the land had been cultivated by them for years and that the sudden demarcation ignored their dependence on it.

Following the clash, the demarcation process was halted temporarily due to the law-and-order situation. However, there is no confirmation from official sources that the mining lease has been cancelled or that the project has been formally stalled. Authorities indicated that further action would be taken after reviewing the situation and maintaining peace in the area.

As of February 2026, the conflict remains unresolved at an administrative level. No information has emerged regarding compensation, rehabilitation, or alternative land arrangements for the affected villagers.

The incident drew attention to recurring land-use conflicts in tribal and agrarian regions of Madhya Pradesh, where government land records often conflict with the ground realities of long-term agricultural use.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to stop demarcation and mining activity; Demand to cancel or review the mining lease;

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

No arrests were reported

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Commercial, Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

No news reports are confirming that the ballast mining project in Barwani was formally delayed or suspended due to the land conflict. The available source only documents a clash during land demarcation.

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Department of Mining, Government of Madhya Pradesh; Revenue Department, Government of Madhya Pradesh; and Police Department, Government of Madhya Pradesh;

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Villagers/farmers cultivating the land and leaseholder’s local associates/workers

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

No arrests were reported

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Taskeen Khan
Taskeen is an environmentalist and entrepreneur with a solid academic foundation from the National Institute of Technology and the University of California, Los Angeles. Holding a Master of Science in Environmental Science and a Master of Technology in Remote Sensing and GIS, she has combined her technical expertise with real-world experience at organisations like Google, ParkMe Inc., Santa Monica, and Global Citizen Year. Currently, she leads a sustainability-focused firm, aiming to create impactful solutions for a greener future.
Show more work
Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Commercial, Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

No news reports are confirming that the ballast mining project in Barwani was formally delayed or suspended due to the land conflict. The available source only documents a clash during land demarcation.

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us