The Peripheral Ring Road (PRR) Phase I, rebranded in 2024 as the Bengaluru Business Corridor, is a 74 km, 10-lane, access-controlled expressway partially encircling the city. Planned to connect Tumakuru Road and Hosur Road, the project by Bengaluru Development Authority (BDA aims to ease Bengaluru’s traffic congestion but has been delayed for nearly two decades due to frequent changes in alignment and slow land acquisition.
In April 2007, the BDA issued a notification to acquire 1,810 acres across 67 villages for Phase I. By 2025, the roads new route was planned to pass through 77 villages. The project cost was estimated at Rs 5,800 crore in 2007, rose to Rs 9,000 crore in 2014, and is now projected at Rs 27,000 crore .The project area increased from 733 hectares to 1036.51 hectares due to change in length of the project from 65.5 km to 73.5 km. The project requires the acquisition of 1860 acres, impacting approximately 4,000 farmers.
The PRR Phase I corridor will pass through areas along Hesaraghatta, Doddaballapura, Bellary, Hennur, Old Madras, Hoskote, and Sarjapur Roads, effectively connecting Tumakuru and Hosur Roads. It is designed to link several major highways and state roads, including Tumakuru Road (NH-4), Hesaraghatta Road (SH-39), Doddaballapura Road (SH-9), Bellary Road (NH-7), Hennur–Bagalur Road (SH-104), Old Madras Road (NH-4), Hoskote–Anekal Road (SH-35), Sarjapur Road, and Hosur Road (NH-7).
Since years those who stand to lose their land have demanded that the compensation should be paid as per the current market value and by duly following the LARR Act, 2013. Some land owners, who were unable to either sell or build on their land for over 15 years due to the issue of notification, have demanded additional compensation. Many people affected by the project have boycotted the survey procedure, even though they are supposed to be present when government officials conduct surveys of their land. They believe the road construction will get delayed further and they are unlikely to receive any compensation in the near future.
The Karnataka Rajya Raitha Sangha organised several protests against the land acquisition and delay by blocking roads, demonstrating in front of the BDA office and submitting memorandums to political representatives, including Chief Minister B S Yeddyurappa. "We do not have faith in politicians and officers. This project will not be completed soon, and we will not get the compensation we deserve. We want our land back. My family has struggled without this land for so long; we could have sold it and used the money for our expenses," Gopal Reddy, a land owner, told LCW. "Due to multiple changes in the alignment, they (government) did not pay anybody (land owners). They could have paid all the farmers, they could have deposited the money in an escrow account in court, but they did not do that. The BDA is wholly and solely responsible for the project cost escalation," another affected person, who wishes to remain anonymous, told LCW. She added, "Even in the last protest held in February 2020, all the farmers were asking the BDA the compensation rate, but the officials are not clear themselves."
Some land owners even requested for a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the BDA as they want to sell their land and not wait for the compensation and project completion. But special land acquisition officer N R Umesh Chandra told LCW that an NOC cannot be issued once a final notification to acquire the land has been issued. The earlier guidance value (minimum value below which no property transaction can take place) is low. We want to pay as per the 2019 guidance value. The final decision on when the amount will be paid will be taken by September end after a few meetings, he added. It was later decided that land losers will be paid according to the guidance value of 2019-2020. However, the decision is not final, and the state government is yet to give its nod on the matter.
In June 2024, the BDA’s third attempt to float a Rs 27,000-crore tender, where the BDA opted for the DBFOT model for the Peripheral Ring Road project failed to attract any bids, following two similar failures in 2023. Thus on 5 September 2025, the State Cabinet decided to carry out the project itself, not through PPP. In January 2025, the Bengaluru Development Authority (BDA) obtained HUDCO’s approval for a Rs 27,000 crore loan, allocating Rs 21,000 crore for land acquisition and Rs 6,000 crore for road construction.
In August 2025, eight committees, each led by a land acquisition officer, held consultations with affected landowners at 18 locations over two days. BDA has nearly finalised compensation for 18 villages, fixing it at three times the 2024-25 guidance value in rural areas (Rs 6.75 crore per acre in Varthur) and twice the value within BBMP limits (Rs 12.70 crore per acre in Hagaduru).
Dissatisfied with this proposal, the affected landowners submitted a legal representation to the BDA Commissioner, citing lapsed acquisition, lack of compensation, mental distress, and arbitrary reductions in guidance value. The letter lays out specific demands if the BDA and the Karnataka government intend to continue with the PRR or associated projects such as the Bengaluru Business Corridor. These include, issuing a fresh acquisition notification under the LARR Act, 2013 with full procedural compliance, providing compensation for economic and emotional harm caused by the delay, including affected landowners as equity stakeholders in upcoming commercial or township projects, drawing on models used in Delhi and Andhra Pradesh, and offering at least one government job per displaced family as part of a humane rehabilitation policy. However, progress remains stalled as compensation disputes continue, with the BDA proposing Transferable Development Rights (TDR) as an alternative, while protestors demand that land acquisition be put on hold until new notifications are issued.
Demand/Contention of the Affected Community
Demand for more compensation than promised
Demand for employment
Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community
Region Classification
Rural
Type of Land
Private
What was the action taken by the police?
How many people did the police detain or arrest?
What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?
Did the person face any violence while in police custody?
If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?
If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?
Legislation under which the accused was charged
Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?
In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?
Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?
Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)
Status of Project
Project stalled due to protests
Original Project Deadline
Whether the Project has been Delayed
Yes
Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users
Agricultural land
Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict
Yes
Source/Reference
<https://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/bengaluru/2020/jan/08/farmers-lay-siege-to-bda-over-land-blocked-for-ring-road-2086651.html>
Total investment involved (in Crores):
₹
27000
Type of investment:
Revised Investment
Year of Estimation
2025
Has the Conflict Ended?
No
When did it end?
Why did the conflict end?
Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict
Land Acquisition Laws, Environmental Law, Other
Legislations/Policies Involved
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute
What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?
What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?
Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:
Incorrect estimation of compensation
Non-implementation/violation of LARR Act
Violation of free prior informed consent
Legal Status:
In Court
Status of Case In Court
Disposed
Whether any adjudicatory body was approached
Name of the adjudicatory body
Name(s) of the Court(s)
Supreme Court of India, High Court of Karnataka
Case Number
Civil Appeal No. 2566 of 2019, WP 4550 of 2008
Main Reasoning/Decision of court
Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:
Whether criminal law was used against protestors:
Reported Details of the Violation:
Date of Violation
Location of Violation
Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:
Bangalore Development Authority
PSUs Involved in the Conflict:
Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?
Yes
Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached
Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:
Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?
Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:
Karnataka Rajya Raitha Sangha
What was the action taken by the police?
How many people did the police detain or arrest?
What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?
Did the person face any violence while in police custody?
If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?
If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?
Legislation under which the accused was charged
Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?
In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?
Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?
Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?




