Assam
Dolmukh Chariali, Fakuwa Doul, Shiva Doul, Vishnu Doul, Devi Doul, Rang Ghar (Sivasagar), Tipam Hills (Tinsukia)
,
Rajkareng
,
Jorhat, Sivasagar
Published :
|
Updated :
Tai-Ahom communities in Assam demand preservation of ancient monuments, sacred sites
Reported by
East Street Journal Asia
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Sourabh Rai, Amrita Chekkutty
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
2016
Year started
2
ha.
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2016
Year started
2
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Encroachment by Non-Right Holders (Other than Caste-based)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Encroachment by Non-Right Holders (Other than Caste-based)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In Assam, the indigenous Tai-Ahom communities are locked in a heartfelt struggle to protect their ancient monuments and sacred sites, places that whisper tales of a dynasty that ruled for 600 years.

These sites—palaces, temples, and burial mounds—provide cultural identity to the Tai-Ahoms numbering around 4.6 million approximately. But today, these historical structures spread across Jorhat, Sivasagar and Tinsukia are under siege from neglect, illegal encroachments, and the grinding wheels of mining activities.

In 2023, Assam’s Chief Minister visited the land of the last Raj Kareng of the Ahom Empire in Jorhat and saw that it had dwindled from 400 bighas to a measly 12 bighas due to encroachments. He then promised to save what’s left and asked for a plan, according to news reports. However, amid rumours that the government was trying to implement another project of the health department instead of the Raj Kareng at the same place, the All Tai Ahom Students Union (ATASU) and the Rajkareng and Historical Monuments Rescue Committee staged a protest against the Assam government in November 2024. They demanded that the CM's promised be fulfilled. 

Since 2016, the Tai-Ahom communities, backed by groups like the All Tai Ahom Students Union (ATASU) and the Jorhat Zila Ahom Sabha, on several occasions have spoken up against incidents of defiling these heritage sites, calling for the protection of Ahom Dynasty monuments. By 2019, people started an online Change.org petition, pleading for someone—anyone—to step up and save these monuments from ruin.

In March 2023, the Gauhati High Court took suo moto cognisance of a report appearing in the Assamese newspaper, namely, 'Niyomiya Barta', pertaining to the illegal mining going on in the historic Tipam field as well as the incidents of encroachment of the Tipam hill area, and called for reports from concerned authorities.

On 4 February 2025, thousands from Tai-Ahom communities marched through Sivasagar, demanding the “scientific preservation and beautification of the Ahom-era monuments” like Shiva Doul, Vishnu Doul, Devi Doul and many more.

During the protest, ATASU Central President Basanta Gogoi emphasized that historical monuments, symbols of Ahom valor and Assamese pride, are facing encroachment threats. He highlighted the risk to structures like the high Shiva Doul and Vishnu Doul due to declining water levels in the Jamuna Canal linked to encroachments. Gogoi accused both outsiders and some Assamese people, including those operating a Tai Sanskriti Bikash Kendra on encroached land, of illegal occupation. He criticized corrupt officials in the Archaeological Departments for enabling these actions and demanded government action within a month, warning of an eviction drive if no response is seen.

On 5 February 2025, the Gauhati High Court ordered the state to survey and protect these sites within six months. While it’s a start, the Tai-Ahom communities are determined to protest until their demands are met.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for promised land

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Preservation of Ancient and Sacred sites, removal of encroachments, prevention of illegal activities, land allotment for memorials, ST status

Region Classification

Urban and Rural

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Religious/Sacred/Cultural value

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Government of Assam, Directorate of Archaeology, Archaeological Survey of India (ASI)

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Coal India Limited (involved indirectly due to mining activities near historical sites)

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

No specific corporate entities are mentioned as directly involved in the conflict, though private actors may be implicated in encroachments, as alleged in protests.

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Tai-Ahom community, All Tai Ahom Students Union (ATASU), Jorhat Zila Ahom Sabha, Historical Last Capital Rajkareng and Historical Heritage Recovery Committee, Asom Jatiyatabadi Yuba Chatra Parishad (AJYCP), TAYPA, Jatiya Sangrami Sena, Sangrami Yuva Chatra Parishad, Sangrami Sena

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Show more work
Latest updates
Morigaon
Assam

Assam villagers fight to save Hatiutha Hill from granite mining

Surat
Gujarat

Dispute erupts after officials demolish alleged encroachment by Jumma Masjid Trust in Surat

East Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Locals demand relocation of silicon factory in East Siang citing pollution concerns

Nalbari
Assam

Nalbari locals raise environmental concerns over brick kiln, stone crusher operations in Pagladiya river

East Godavari
Andhra Pradesh

Polavaram irrigation project affected families in Andhra Pradesh still awaiting rehabilitation

Tumkur
Karnataka

Farmers Yet to Receive Compensation for Tumkur-Honnavar National Highway in Karnataka

Junagadh
Gujarat

Farmers in Gujarat's Junagadh village protest against inclusion in urban area

East Godavari
Andhra Pradesh

Farmers await return of land acquired for Kakinada SEZ in Andhra Pradesh

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for promised land

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Religious/Sacred/Cultural value

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us