JOIN THE LCW
COMMUNITY

Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, quarterly analytics report, curated expert talks, merchandise and much more. Support our work!

Sign up today

Residents of Manipur Village to Allow Inauguration of Mapithel Dam after Compensation

Reported by

Thokchom Seema

Legal Review by

Edited by

Updated by

Published on

August 30, 2016

May 17, 2022

Edited on

August 30, 2016

State

Manipur

Sector

Infrastructure

People Affected by Conflict

8000

Households Affected by Conflict

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

2000

ha

Starting Year

1989

Location of Conflict

Chadong

Ukhrul

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Multipurpose Dam

Land Conflict Summary

The Mapithel Dam is a project undertaken by the state's Irrigation and Flood Control Department under the assistance of the Central government. Conceived in the early 1970s, the dam began to be constructed in 1989. Between its conception and construction, the people who would be affected by it were told about the benefits of the project, but they were not told that they would have to sacrifice their homes for it. It was only when the government initiated the survey did they realise that the project was going to be built on their own land, and they started opposing it. The survey was never completed, but the project was approved in 1980. The project, however, has been delayed over the years and is yet to be fully functional. In 2015, the dam, built on the Thoubal (Yangwui Kong) river, submerged residential areas, schools, churches, paddy fields, grazing grounds and forest areas spread over more than 2,000 hectares. The filling of the reservoir led to the drying up of the river downstream. The residents in the area can no longer fish or collect sandstone, which is their main source of livelihood. Around 23 villages have been directly affected by the project, and some villages like Chadong have been completely submerged. The first organised dissent against the project took place in 2013, when Chandel Nagas contended that the project violated environmental safeguards. They also argued that the first stage of environmental clearance was granted 11 years before the construction began, and the second was done without consulting them and complying with the legal procedure. When the tribal ministry refused to take action, they approached the National Green Tribunal in August 2013, which ruled in their favour. In December 2017, the Tribunal ordered the state to comply with the Forest Rights Act of 2006 and consult the villagers. However, in 2018, the villagers claimed that the state government did not honour the Tribunal's judgement and, in a memorandum to the prime minister, argued that this would amount to contempt of court. They also protested the inauguration of the dam by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, demanding to be compensated before the project can be called complete and inaugurated. This led to the government postponing the inauguration temporarily. On February 16, 2020, the 23 affected villages called for a 48hour shutdown along the ImphalUkhrul stretch on National Highway 150 to protest against the government's indifference. They vandalised a vehicle belonging to the subdivisional officer of Jessami in Ukhrul district. This led to police intervention. The police allegedly fired tear gas, which injured four persons. The villagers contended that in 2018, Chief Minister N. Biren Singh promised to release compensation package for the affected people but the promise never materialised. They have been demanding forest rights, fishing rights and economic livelihood packages from the government, among other things. Meanwhile, the inauguration of the dam is yet to take place.

Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for compensation

Complaint against procedural violations

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to inaugurate the dam only after compensation is fully paid

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Both

Type of Common Land

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

1500

Type of investment:

Revised Investment

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Legal Data

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Land Acquisition Laws, Forest and Scheduled Area Governance Laws, Environmental Laws

Legislations/Policies Involved

Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Section 4 [This section requires the publication of a preliminary notification to inform affected parties of the intention to acquire the land for public purpose]; Section 5A [This section empowers any person interested in the land to object to the land acquisition, and the collector must hear such objections]; Section 9 [This section requires the collector to send public notice to interested persons regarding acquisition of land and compensation claims]
Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
Section 2 [This section restricts state governments from allotting forestland for non-forest purpose or de-reserving forestland without the prior approval of the Central government]
Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006
Section 7 [This section provides the various stages of scoping, public consultation and environmental clearances required before a project can be commenced]
Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 1994
Section 2 [This section states which projects would be required to seek environmental clearances and the procedures for the same]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Lack of legal protection over land rights

Delay in compensation

Non-payment of compensation/promised compensation

Violation of free prior informed consent

Violation of environmental laws

Legal Status:

In Court

Status of Case In Court

Disposed

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

Yes

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Case Number

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

No items found.

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

Reported Details of the Violation:

Four individuals were injured after police used tear gas to disperse a protesting crowd during a 48-hour shutdown. No free, prior and informed consent was sought from those to be displaced by the dam, nor were the procedures mandated by the Land Acquisition Act followed.

Date of Violation

February 17, 2020

Location of Violation

Imphal-Ukhrul stretch on National Highway 150

Additional Information

Nature of Protest

Complaints/petitions/letters/memorandums to officials

Protests/marches

Property damage/arson

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Manipur Irrigation and Flood Control Department

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Progressive Constructions Limited

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Centre for Research and Advocacy Manipur, Citizen Concern for Dams and Development, Mapithel Dam Affected Villages Organisation, Mapithel Dam Affected Ching-Tam (hill-valley) Organisation, Mapithel Dam-Affected Headmen Chiefs and Elders Organisation

Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Resources

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Images

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Video

The Mapithel Dam is a project undertaken by the state's Irrigation and Flood Control Department under the assistance of the Central government. Conceived in the early 1970s, the dam began to be constructed in 1989. Between its conception and construction, the people who would be affected by it were told about the benefits of the project, but they were not told that they would have to sacrifice their homes for it. It was only when the government initiated the survey did they realise that the project was going to be built on their own land, and they started opposing it. The survey was never completed, but the project was approved in 1980. The project, however, has been delayed over the years and is yet to be fully functional. In 2015, the dam, built on the Thoubal (Yangwui Kong) river, submerged residential areas, schools, churches, paddy fields, grazing grounds and forest areas spread over more than 2,000 hectares. The filling of the reservoir led to the drying up of the river downstream. The residents in the area can no longer fish or collect sandstone, which is their main source of livelihood. Around 23 villages have been directly affected by the project, and some villages like Chadong have been completely submerged. The first organised dissent against the project took place in 2013, when Chandel Nagas contended that the project violated environmental safeguards. They also argued that the first stage of environmental clearance was granted 11 years before the construction began, and the second was done without consulting them and complying with the legal procedure. When the tribal ministry refused to take action, they approached the National Green Tribunal in August 2013, which ruled in their favour. In December 2017, the Tribunal ordered the state to comply with the Forest Rights Act of 2006 and consult the villagers. However, in 2018, the villagers claimed that the state government did not honour the Tribunal's judgement and, in a memorandum to the prime minister, argued that this would amount to contempt of court. They also protested the inauguration of the dam by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, demanding to be compensated before the project can be called complete and inaugurated. This led to the government postponing the inauguration temporarily. On February 16, 2020, the 23 affected villages called for a 48hour shutdown along the ImphalUkhrul stretch on National Highway 150 to protest against the government's indifference. They vandalised a vehicle belonging to the subdivisional officer of Jessami in Ukhrul district. This led to police intervention. The police allegedly fired tear gas, which injured four persons. The villagers contended that in 2018, Chief Minister N. Biren Singh promised to release compensation package for the affected people but the promise never materialised. They have been demanding forest rights, fishing rights and economic livelihood packages from the government, among other things. Meanwhile, the inauguration of the dam is yet to take place.

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for compensation

Complaint against procedural violations

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to inaugurate the dam only after compensation is fully paid

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Both

Type of Common Land

Forest and Non-Forest

Total investment involved (in Crores):

1500

Type of investment:

Revised Investment

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Land Acquisition Laws, Forest and Scheduled Area Governance Laws, Environmental Laws

Legislations/Policies Involved

Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Section 4 [This section requires the publication of a preliminary notification to inform affected parties of the intention to acquire the land for public purpose]; Section 5A [This section empowers any person interested in the land to object to the land acquisition, and the collector must hear such objections]; Section 9 [This section requires the collector to send public notice to interested persons regarding acquisition of land and compensation claims]
Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
Section 2 [This section restricts state governments from allotting forestland for non-forest purpose or de-reserving forestland without the prior approval of the Central government]
Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006
Section 7 [This section provides the various stages of scoping, public consultation and environmental clearances required before a project can be commenced]
Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 1994
Section 2 [This section states which projects would be required to seek environmental clearances and the procedures for the same]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Lack of legal protection over land rights

Delay in compensation

Non-payment of compensation/promised compensation

Violation of free prior informed consent

Violation of environmental laws

Legal Status:

In Court

Status of Case In Court

Disposed

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

Yes

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Case Number

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

No items found.

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

Reported Details of the Violation:

Four individuals were injured after police used tear gas to disperse a protesting crowd during a 48-hour shutdown. No free, prior and informed consent was sought from those to be displaced by the dam, nor were the procedures mandated by the Land Acquisition Act followed.

Date of Violation

February 17, 2020

Location of Violation

Imphal-Ukhrul stretch on National Highway 150

Nature of Protest

Complaints/petitions/letters/memorandums to officials

Protests/marches

Property damage/arson

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Manipur Irrigation and Flood Control Department

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Progressive Constructions Limited

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Centre for Research and Advocacy Manipur, Citizen Concern for Dams and Development, Mapithel Dam Affected Villages Organisation, Mapithel Dam Affected Ching-Tam (hill-valley) Organisation, Mapithel Dam-Affected Headmen Chiefs and Elders Organisation

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Documented By

Text Link

Reviewed By

Text Link

Updated By

Text Link

Edited By

Text LinkLand Conflict Watch

Other Land Conflicts in Manipur

cross
Not a member yet?
Sign up now