Meghalaya
,
Maikhuli
,
Ri Bhoi
Published :
Aug 2025
|
Updated :
Maikhuli village in Meghalaya opposes transfer of fishery rights to Assam amid border dispute settlement talks
Reported by
Sarup Sinha
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Sourabh Rai, Amrita Chekkutty
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
2025
Year started
ha.
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2025
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Border Dispute
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Border Dispute
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Residents of Maikhuli village held a large protest on 11 July 2025 against a recent border settlement signed between Assam and Meghalaya. The protest centred around a community fish pond that villagers claimed has been unfairly ceded to Assam under the new Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the two states as part of their ongoing border resolution efforts.

Maikhuli, situated along the disputed interstate boundary, is one of six areas part of ongoing talks between the two states. Villagers claim the fish pond in question lies within Meghalaya’s Ri Bhoi district and has been essential to their economic life for decades.

According to the villagers, the pond supports the village’s livelihood through fish farming, generating revenue that has helped finance the local school and fulfil other community needs. Protesters argue that handing the pond over to Assam would be wrong and harmful to their economy. The villagers are demanding that the Meghalaya government take urgent steps to reclaim the pond.

During the rally, Maikhuli village headman Nicholas Marak and former headman Heniton Marak expressed their anger. “Under no circumstances will we allow the fishery pond to be handed over to Assam. This pond has belonged to us for over 50 years— it is part of our identity, our survival, and our future,” they declared.

The leaders also revealed that the village has submitted multiple petitions to Meghalaya Chief Minister Conrad K Sangma, urging the state government to revise the MoU, but haven't received any response.

Residents have warned that they are ready to take further action if the government does not help them in reclaiming the pond. They urged both state governments to revise the agreement.

“We will not accept any decision that leads to the loss of our resources. This pond belongs to Maikhuli, and we will continue to fight for it”, said one of the protest leaders.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to get back acquired land

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Fishing

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Government of Meghalaya; Government of Assam; District administration of Kamrup; District administration of Ri-Bhoi

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Sarup Sinha

Sarup is a researcher and doctoral student in Political Science at the North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong. His research interests lie in the area of ethnic and land conflicts, political ecology and development and urban spaces of Northeast India. He has a Masters’ degree in Development Studies from the Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati. He has previously done research/internships with NABARD, Oxford Microfinance Initiative (renamed Oxford Development Consultancy) and CSDS (Lokniti Programme).

Show more work
Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to get back acquired land

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Fishing

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us