Kerala
,
Aralam
,
Published :
Aug 2025
|
Updated :
Tribal rehabilitation versus commercial leasing: The Aralam Farm land dispute in Kerala's Kannur
Reported by
Jamsheena Mullappatt
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Amrita Chekkutty
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
300
Households affected
1440
People affected
2024
Year started
669.77
ha.
Land area affected
300
Households affected
1440
People Affected
2024
Year started
669.77
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Other Kind of Land Use
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Unclassifed
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Other Kind of Land Use
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In July 2024, the Aralam Farm management decided to lease out 1,655 acres of land to private individuals for participatory farming. The land, located in the Kannur district, is part of the Aralam farmland bought by the Kerala government in 2004 for a tribal rehabilitation centre. The move has sparked opposition from tribals and local organisations.

As part of the agreement, 530 acres of land in Farm Block One have been leased to Malur Agro Farm Private Limited for 30 years, 1,000 acres to Agri Farm in Ernakulam for four years for pineapple cultivation, 25 acres to KVS Food Production Company in Ernakulam for 30 years to run a pig farm, and 100 acres to Iritty Bavali Commune Company for 30 years.

On 11 September 2024, tribal organisations, including the Adivasi Dalit Munnetra Samiti and the Adivasi Gotra Jana Sabha, staged a protest at the Kannur Collectorate against the transfer of the farm to private individuals. On 8 November, the Adivasi Gotra Jana Sabha staged another protest. Led by the ruling party CPM's Kannur district secretary M V Jayarajan, the dharna demanded that the lease be cancelled in February 2025. 

Protesters pointed out that the Kerala government purchased the 7,500 acres of Aralam farmland from the central government by paying Rs 42 crore from the Scheduled Tribes Rehabilitation Fund. The entire land was supposed to be used for the rehabilitation of landless tribals. However, 4,054 acres of land were given for rehabilitation, and the remaining 3,446 acres of land was used to set up the Aralam Farming Corporation (Kerala) Limited in 2010 to provide livelihood to tribal communities.

The Tribal Welfare Committee has accused some department heads of making long-term lease agreements on land at their own discretion without the permission of the government or the Scheduled Tribes Development Department.

In a report by the Hindu, the Aralam Farming Corporation denied leasing land to private entrepreneurs. Corporation administrative officer Nitheesh Kumar clarified that claims of six farms being leased were false.

The farm management authorities argue that the company has the power to enter into an an agreement with any individual or other cooperative company for the land in Aralam Farm as per the company's bylaws. The management says that the agreement will provide an investment of Rs 200 crore, employment to about 300 people from the rehabilitation area every day, and an income share of of Rs 96 crore.

According to Sreeraman Koyyon, president of the Adivasi Dalit Munnetra Samiti (ADMS), the land is being leased to private individuals without any upfront payment, with only 20 percent of annual profits promised to the farm. He stressed that the land earmarked for tribals should not be diverted for other purposes, citing a 2015 agreement with then Chief Minister Oommen Chandy that prohibited leasing agricultural land for commercial use.

Stating that around 5,000 landless tribals in Kannur are currently waiting for land, Koyyon argued that if each family were given one acre, the landlessness issue could be resolved. He has also demanded that the farm be declared an autonomous tribal panchayat under the Panchayat (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act (PESA).

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

200

Type of investment:

Investment Made

Year of Estimation

2024

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Scheduled Tribes Development Department

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Adivasi Dalit Munnetra Samiti; Adivasi Gotra Jana Sabha

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Jamsheena Mullappatt
My name is Jamsheena Mullappatt. I am an independent journalist based in Kerala with over a decade of experience in the field. I hold a postgraduate degree in Mass Communication and Journalism. Since beginning my career in 2013, I have focused on reporting from the margins of society—covering the lives and struggles of tribal communities, Dalits, fishermen, plantation workers, gender minorities, and religious minorities. My work deeply engages with issues related to land disputes, educational inequalities, labor exploitation, human rights, the environment, expatriate communities, and caste-based injustices.
Show more work
Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Complaint against procedural violations

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us