Gujarat
,
Khodu
,
Surendranagar
Published :
Dec 2025
|
Updated :
Maldhari community's resistance to illegal mining on grazing land in Gujarat's Khodu village
Reported by
Suchak Patel
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Rakshit Dhingra
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
1156
Households affected
6060
People affected
2008
Year started
80.94
ha.
Land area affected
1156
Households affected
6060
People Affected
2008
Year started
80.94
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Other Kind of Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Unclassifed
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Other Kind of Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In October 2025, the Maldhari community in Gujarat's Khodu village in Wadhwan taluka alleged large-scale illegal mining on 200 acres of 'Gauchar' (or grazing) land. The community, which depends on cattle-rearing, demanded an immediate halt to the mining activity and the release of the grazing land from encroachment citing threat to their livelihood.

Representatives of the community on 8 October 2025 submitted a written representation to the District Collector alleging that the mineral mafia has been destroying the land by digging on a large scale in survey no. 1258 and other grazing lands in the outskirts of Khodu village.

Villagers alleged that powerful blasts are being used to extract white stone illegally, creating fear among residents and posing a danger to students and pedestrians travelling on the roads leading to Rupavati and Velavadar. They also pointed out the risk posed by these explosions near a 66 kV sub-station, where high-tension lines run barely ten feet away from the mining site.

They claimed that the illegal operations have been flourishing with the connivance of officials in the Mines and Minerals Department, who allegedly facilitate the issuance of illegal licences. Villagers added that they have consistently opposed excavation or earthwork on public land, but those who raise objections are allegedly being intimidated, assaulted, or threatened with false cases under the Atrocity Act. They further alleged attempts to create caste-based tensions through social media to divide the community and weaken the protest.

According to the villagers, nearly 200 acres of Gauchar land has been under pressure for two decades. Of this, stone mining reportedly takes place on around 50 acres, while another 50 acres has been encroached upon by an individual who has planted trees and fenced off the area. In all, villagers say that 10 survey numbers of 'Gauchar' and government waste land are affected. Despite raising the issue before the Chief Minister in 2008 and the District Collector in 2012, they claim no substantial action has been taken.

With tensions rising, villagers have warned that if mining is not stopped within 30 days, they will march to the Collector’s office with their livestock and stage a sit-in. They have demanded a neutral and time-bound inquiry and specifically requested that the Prant Officer of Chotila be assigned charge for two months to oversee the process. Farmers are also demanding that all survey numbers officially measured and boundary stakes installed to prevent further land grab.

The villagers said that if authorities continue to ignore their complaints, they will launch a Gandhian-style agitation, marking another chapter in the growing land-rights and resource-access conflicts unfolding across rural Gujarat.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Grazing

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Suchak Patel
Suchak is an independent researcher.
Show more work
Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Opposition against environmental degradation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Grazing

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us