Madhya Pradesh
Amdand, Amraikhoh, Basi Berdah, Phatpani, Belwar, Jhalari, Siraswah (Sarai Tehsil)
,
Dhirauli
,
Singrauli
Published :
Nov 2025
|
Updated :
Deforestation, displacement and compensation disputes in Adani Group’s Dhirauli coal mine project
Reported by
Sourabh Balwani
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Rakshit Dhingra
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
1000
Households affected
4800
People affected
2019
Year started
2672
ha.
Land area affected
1000
Households affected
4800
People Affected
2019
Year started
2672
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Coal Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Unclassifed
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Coal Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In September 2025, the incident of felling trees for a proposed coal mine by Adani Group in Dhirauli area of Singrali district in Madhya Pradesh drew criticisms. The mine project, allotted to the conglomerate in 2019 and which received the approval from Coal Ministry in September 2025 to commence its operation, boasts of peak production capacity of 6.5 million tons per annum (MTPA), through both open cast method and underground mining.

The coal mine project involves the diversion of 1397.54 hectares of forest land across five villages and further would impact an additional three villages adjacent to the proposed site. The affected villages include Amdand, Amraikhoh, Basi Berdah, Phatpani, Belwar, Dhirauli, Jhalari and Siraswah. The mining lease sprawls across 26.72 kilometres, nearly two-thirds of which is forest land sustaining local communities. The remaining lease includes dwellings and farms. 

However, in September 2025, former Union Environment Minister and Congress leader Jairam Ramesh pointed out that the Adani Group began cutting trees on government and forest land for its project in violation of the provisions of Forest Rights Act. He stated that the project is being pushed ahead without obtaining Stage-II Forest Clearance and in blatant violation of FRA 2006 and PESA 1996 laws.

It is alleged that provisions of mandatory consultations with the Gram Sabha as envisaged under the PESA Act 1996 have been ignored, and further the Supreme Court judgment mandating Gram Sabha consent has been violated.

The project is expected to impact the livelihoods of the indigenous people, as the deforestation exercise is slated to trim trees of Mahua, tendu, medicines and fuel wood – sources of forest produce on which indigenous communities largely depend on for sustenance.

Earlier, a report noted that local communities particularly those who would be displaced, protested in the public meeting convened by district administration in September 2022 for discussions on Resettlement and Rehabilitation Scheme. The villagers alleged that their rights have been ignored during the land-takeover process for Dhirauli Coal project. It was also alleged that public hearing conducted in May 2022 as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study project was also not conducted in a fair manner.

In February 2022, the indigenous people and farmers had protested calling violation of land acquisition norms for this project. Further, it was alleged the project was moving ahead despite issues surrounding displacement and compensation.

The Madhya Pradesh government, however, said that all necessary approvals and processes have been duly followed and the Union Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change has granted Stage-II approval for the project. It claimed that the project land neither comes under the PESA area nor the Fifth Schedule Area, and a public hearing had been carried out as per rules and with the Gram Sabha approval. It also said the process of paying total compensation of Rs 18 crore to 49 patta owners is underway at the district level.

It is important to note that in its reply to a Lok Sabha question on 9 August 2023, the Ministry of Coal referred to the Dhirauli Coal Mining project area, indicating that it falls within a protected region under the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Opposition against environmental degradation

Refusal to give up land for the project

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for compensation

Demand for rehabilitation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

There are environmental concerns over the impact of the project on Hardul stream and its catchment area, as a section of stream flows in lease area. The Elephant Corridor also passes through the lease area.

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Grazing, Residential area, Other environmental services

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

2800

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2021

Page Number In Investment Document:

2

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change; Ministry of Coal; Office of District Collector Singrauli; Madhya Pradesh Pollution Control Board

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Adani Power Limited; Mahan Energen Ltd (Earlier - Stratatech Mineral Resources Private Limited)

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Indigenous Tribal Communities; Baigas - Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group (PVTG); Scheduled Caste communities

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Sourabh Balwani
Sourabh is a lawyer and researcher based in Madhya Pradesh, holding a law degree from National Law University Nagpur. He began his professional journey in environmental law practice and has developed a keen interest in sustainability, climate change and the green economy. He enjoys exploring the economic landscape of contemporary India and is invigorated by the idea of law beyond the courtroom.
Show more work
Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Opposition against environmental degradation

Refusal to give up land for the project

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for compensation

Demand for rehabilitation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Grazing, Residential area, Other environmental services

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us