Assam
Uriamghat, Geleky (Sivasagar), Charaideo, Mariani (Jorhat), Dikhangsit (Karbi Anglong), Wokha Border (Assam-Nagaland disputed border), Septsuyong Lu, Kangtsüng, Tuli region (Mokokchung)
,
Merapani and Uriamghat
,
Golaghat
Published :
Sep 2016
|
Updated :
April 14, 2025
Farmers protest eviction order at Merapani farm as Assam–Nagaland border row continues
Reported by
Ashmita Bhattacharya
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
780
Households affected
3744
People affected
1963
Year started
66000
ha.
Land area affected
780
Households affected
3744
People Affected
1963
Year started
66000
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Border Dispute
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Border Dispute
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

The conflict between Assam and Nagaland mostly relates to land encroachment. During the creation of Nagaland in 1963, an agreement was signed by the Naga People's Committee and the then Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru. Some of the clauses in the agreement on land transfer to Nagaland remain unimplemented to date and have become the underlying cause of conflict between the two states.

Assam and Nagaland share a 434-kilometre border. In other words, about 66,000 hectares of land are disputed. This interstate border is divided into six sectors -- A, B, C, D, E and F. These sectors include Sivsagar, Golaghat, Jorhat and Karbi Anglong districts, all of which presently lie in Assam. Nagaland claims that sectors A, B, C and D belong to the Naga tribes and should not be a part of Assam.

During the colonial rule, the British government made these sectors a part of Assam for administrative convenience; these were supposed to be transferred to Nagaland after its creation. But till date, no such transfer has been made. The Assam government claims that since there has been no direction from the Centre in this regard, it shall not take steps to carve out the districts demanded by Nagaland.

This decades-old dispute has given rise to violent incidents over the years, leading to mass killings and displacement, and remains a constant cause of concern between the two states.

Two violent incidents in 1979 and 1985 resulted in over 100 fatalities. On 5 January 1979, armed men from Nagaland killed 54 Assamese people in a series of attacks on villages in Golaghat district. Over 23,500 people had to be accommodated in relief camps at the time. In June 1985, over 41 people in Assam were murdered, including 28 Assam police personnel at Merapani, also in Golaghat.

Several rounds of talks have been held between the two states to settle this dispute, but these have not led to any solution to date.

On 11 August 2014, Assamese people staged a protest outside a Central Reserve Police Force camp, demanding the release of two school students allegedly abducted by Naga insurgents. Following this, violence erupted as the All Adivasi National Liberation Army raided two villages along the Assam-Nagaland border – Ronsuyan and Chandalashung – beating up people and destroying property. This led to an exodus of over 10,000 people, who were moved to 14 relief camps in Uriamghat in Golaghat.

In the aftermath of this violence, the Assam government moved the Supreme Court. The dispute is being mediated by the Boundary Commission set up under the direction of the court.

In September 2020, after six years, Assam and Nagaland held a high-level meeting to address their border dispute. Assam proposed joint police patrols along the border, which Nagaland accepted in principle. However, tensions escalated in November when Assam accused Nagaland of establishing a police camp in the disputed Dissoi Valley Reserve Forest. While the situation has been controlled, the states are still awaiting a decision from the Supreme Court.

Meanwhile, a village along the Golaghat-Wokha border is caught in a tug-of-war between Assam and Nagaland as it still lacks basic amenities. The area, located within a Nagaland seed farm in Merapani, is claimed by both states—Assam considers it part of Golaghat district, while Nagaland claims it for Wokha. Although the villagers are voters in the Golaghat constituency, they reside within this disputed area, which has seen continuous neglect, including the last stretch of road connecting the two states. The CRPF is deployed to maintain law and order in the region.

A local official told LCW that Nagaland is willing to repair the road, but Assam's peace committee has denied permission. The official, who wished to remain anonymous, noted concerns that Nagaland's construction could lead to claims of ownership over the area.

In the Sivasagar district of eastern Assam, reports indicate that miscreants from Nagaland have illegally cleared about 1.5 bigha of land within the Geleky Reserve Forest. This was discovered during a joint patrol by Forest Department officials and Border Outpost personnel on 6 February 2024, who observed the recent tree felling on the eastern side of the Dorikhona River. On the contrary, Nagaland has expressed concern over the alleged encroachment by Assam on Nagaland’s Reserve Forest area in the nearby bordering Tuli region under Mokokchung district.

In April 2025, tension escalated further after the Nagaland government issued a directive to farmers in Merapani Bholaguri seed farm to cease seed farming activities and vacate the land. Over 1,000 farmers staged a massive protest against the directive.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Demand for better access to common land/resources

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Settling border dispute

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

Arrest

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area, Non-agri rural enterprise, Commercial, Government or community-regulated urban commons

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Government of Assam, Government of Nagaland, Ministry of Home Affairs and the Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Naga and Assamese Communities

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

Arrest

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Ashmita Bhattacharya
Show more work
Latest updates
Golaghat
Assam

Farmers protest eviction order at Merapani farm as Assam–Nagaland border row continues

Thiruvallur
Tamil Nadu

NGT suspends environmental clearance for SIPCOT project in Tamil Nadu's Gummidipoondi

Thane
Maharashtra

6,500 families seek rehabilitation as Kalyan-Dombivli civic body begins demolition of over 60 illegal buildings

Nandurbar
Maharashtra

Tribespeople in villages of Nandurbar district oppose construction of additional pipeline in their area in Maharashtra

Ukhrul, Kamjong, Tengnoupal, Chandel
Manipur

Several mining agreements in Manipur granted without villagers' consent, environmental clearances

Jaisalmer
Rajasthan

Adani solar plant threatens fertile belt in Jaisalmer's Bhimsar village

Nagpur
Maharashtra

Nagpur authorities raze houses of violence accused citing unauthorised construction

Mehsana
Gujarat

Gujarat's Bamosana village opposes construction of power line poles on agricultural land

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Demand for better access to common land/resources

Opposition against environmental degradation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area, Non-agri rural enterprise, Commercial, Government or community-regulated urban commons

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us