Coal India Ordered to Suspend Mining at Assam's Dehing Patkai Wildlife Sanctuary

Reported by

Sarup SinhaLand Conflict Watch

Last updated on

April 6, 2021

Location of Conflict


Jeypore, Digboi


Reason or Cause of Conflict

Coal Mining



People Affected by Conflict

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)



Starting Year






Dehing Patkai Wildlife Sanctuary is a an evergreen rainforest located in Dibrugarh and Tinsukia districts in Assam, covering an area of 111.19 square kilometres. It is part of the Dehing Patkai Elephant Reserve established in 2003 under Project Elephant. Counted among the richest biodiversity hotspots in the world, Dehing Patkai is often called the Amazon of the East. In April 2020, the National Board for Wildlife (NBWL), the apex advisory body on matters related to conservation and wildlife, approved a proposal from North Eastern Coalfields (NEC), a unit of Coal India Limited (CIL), to carry out opencast coal mining in 57.20 hectares of forestland at the Saleki Proposed Reserve Forest, which is part of the Dehing Patkai Elephant Reserve. The decision was taken at the 57th Meeting of the Standing Committee of the NBWL, chaired by Minister of Environment, Forest and Climate Change Prakash Javadekar on April 17, 2020, through videoconferencing. The Standing Committee considered 31 proposals altogether, 16 of which related to infrastructure projects. All 16 proposals were approved. The decision of NBWL to rush through environmental clearances while the country was reeling under the COVID19 pandemic received criticism from several quarters. Many doubted whether environmental impact assessments received enough importance in the decisionmaking process. Outraged at the nod for coal mining at Dehing Patkai, several environmentalists, activists, student bodies, artists and others in the state launched a dynamic online protest using thoughtful artworks, slogans, videos and online signature campaigns while also making hashtags like #SaveDehingPatkai and #IAmDehingPatkai trend on several online platforms. All of them have demanded a complete ban on opencast coal mining, calling it detrimental to the ecological balance of the wildlife sanctuary. It is reported that mining was initially restricted to CIL, but over the last few years, as pointed out by ornithologist Anwaruddin Chowdhury, illegal mining in the protected area has increased rapidly. Trinayan Gogoi, founder of the nonprofit Green Bud Society, told the media that attacks on human settlements by elephants have resulted from coal mining and tree felling which have shrunk the area reserved for the mammal. It has also been reported that CIL had been carrying out mining operations at Dehing Patkai even though its lease, which NEC had obtained for 30 years, had expired in 2003. This means that CIL has been mining in the area violating the provisions of the Forest Conservation Act (FCA), 1980. In 2012, CIL had sought a clearance of 98.59 hectares, which included a postfacto approval from 2003 to 2013. The request, however, was rejected. It was only in 2019 that the Centre gave StageI clearance to CIL for opencast mining on 57.20 hectares, with 28 conditions, including fines and enquiries against personnel responsible for the violation of the FCA. The Assam Forest Department imposed a penalty of INR 43.25 crore on CIL for carrying out illegal mining activities between 2003 and 2019. On June 4, 2020, the Gauhati High Court took suo moto cognizance of allegations over coal mining in the Dehing Patkai forest and issued notices to the Centre, state government, CIL and other stakeholders after two consecutive public interest litigations (PILs) were filed in the high court. The PILs denounced CIL for obtaining clearance by furnishing inaccurate information. In the face of mounting evidence and political pressure, the 58th Standing Committee of NBWL ordered a suspension on all mining activity in Dehing Patkai from July 2020 until further notice. Meanwhile, the Assam government announced in July that year that Dehing Patkai Wildlife Sanctuary would be upgraded to a National Park. The preliminary notification regarding the same was issued in December 2020. Responding to the allegations over coal mining, the state had formed a oneman inquiry commission on July 18, 2020, to investigate all such allegations since 2003. The report is yet to be made public.

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Complete ban on coal mining

Region Classification

Urban and Rural

Type of Land


Type of Common Land


Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Has the Conflict Ended?


When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Forest and Scheduled Area Governance Laws, Central/State Government Policy, Environmental Laws

Legislations/Policies Involved

  1. The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

    Section 2: [Restriction on the dereservation of forests or use of forest land for non-forest purpose]

  2. Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972

    Section 29: [Destruction within a sanctuary is prohibited without prior permission]

  3. Biological Diversity Act, 2002

    Section 19: [Approval by the National Biodiversity Authority required for undertaking activities]

  4. Assam Forest Regulation, 1891

    Section 3(4): [Forest produce includes coal]; Section 25: [Subjecting forest produce to any manufacturing process or removal of such forest produce is prohibited]

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community? What was the decision of the concerned government department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Violation of environmental laws

Legal Status:

In Court

Status of Case In Court


Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Gauhati High Court

Case Number

PIL (Suo Moto) 3/2020

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

Whether criminal law was used against protestors

Official name of the criminal law. Did the case reach trial?

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Nature of Protest

Advocacy (for inclusion in courts), Artistic and creative actions (Theatre, Music, Murals, etc), Campaigns (Grassroots organisations/press releases/media), Media based activism/alternative media , Public campaign

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

National Board for Wildlife; Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change; Department of Environment & Forests, Government of Assam; Ministry of Mines

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Coal India Limited, North Eastern Coalfields

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?


Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?


Name, Designation and Comment of Corporate Authorities Approached

Other Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Bharatiya Janata Party (Assam unit), Indian National Congress (Assam unit), Assam Environmental NGO Forum

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:
No Images Available

Documented By

Sarup Sinha

Reviewed By

Sarup Sinha

Updated By

Sarup Sinha

Edited By

Sarup SinhaLand Conflict Watch

Support our work

Your contribution ensures continuity of this crucial project.

As a member, you will get exclusive access to special reports, policy papers and research projects undertaken by Land Conflict Watch and behind-the-scenes interactions with the writers and researchers about their work.
Contribute Now