JOIN THE LCW
COMMUNITY

Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, quarterly analytics report, curated expert talks, merchandise and much more. Support our work!

Sign up today

Archaeological Survey of India issues eviction notice to families living near Tughlaqabad Fort

Reported by

Asmi Sharma

Legal Review by

Anmol Gupta, Mukta Joshi

Edited by

Radhika Chatterjee

Updated by

Published on

May 24, 2023

May 26, 2023

Edited on

May 24, 2023

State

Delhi

Sector

Infrastructure

People Affected by Conflict

Households Affected by Conflict

250

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

667

ha

Starting Year

2023

Location of Conflict

Bengali Colony, Tughlaqabad

South East Delhi

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Urban Development (Other than Smart Cities)

Land Conflict Summary

On 11 January 2023, the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) issued eviction notices to families living in and around Tughlaqabad Fort in New Delhi. ASI, the nodal agency responsible for maintaining sites of historic importance, deemed the settlements in the area 'illegal encroachments' and in violation of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act of 1958 (AMASR Act).

The notice informed residents that demolition would begin within 15 days and directed them to vacate the premises by 26 January. It did not provide any information on rehabilitation or provisioning of temporary shelter for the residents.

The Tughlaqabad Fort is a centrally protected monument under the AMASR Act. The fort's walls, gateways, bastions, and internal and external buildings all fall within the definition of a 'protected' site.

Tughlaqabad Fort and the surrounding area is also home to a number of settlements. The eviction notices were served to residents of Bengali Colony, one of the largest settlements of the area, where most residents are daily-wage labourers or domestic workers. The residents claim they have lived there for decades.

A large section of the community living in the colony has migrated from West Bengal, Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. Many residents have even registered their houses under the Pradhan Mantri-Uday Scheme in December 2020, a scheme launched by the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs in 2019 to confer ownership rights to properties in 1,731 unauthorised colonies.

After receiving the notice, community members organised protests and roadblocks. But they have failed to get legal protection from the demolition, a member of AICCTU who has been protesting along with the residents told LCW.

The scale of the eviction prompted the Delhi Commission for the Protection of Children to take up the matter suo-moto. It wrote to ASI demanding the withdrawal of the order until adequate arrangements are made for the rehabilitation of the families and thousands of children living in Bengali Colony, adding that the eviction drive will severely affect children's education. An RTI application filed by LCW found that to date no orders have been issued by any government authority to suspend the eviction.

Community members claim that the presence of police and CRPF personnel in the area has increased after their protests began. The entrances and exits to the colony have been barricaded to control movement and prevent people from gathering. There have also been reports of use of police force against protesting residents, as well as routine harassment.

Some affected families even possess certificates showing that the land was allotted to them under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana.

The eviction notices come in the backdrop of a long-running litigation. A public interest litigation was filed by Mr. S.N. Bhardwaj, in the Delhi High Court in 2001 against the unauthorised constructions and encroachments in and around the fort. The High Court however disposed that petition.

Dissatisfied with the disposal, Bhardwaj approached the Supreme Court (SC) with a similar plea through a special leave petition.

In 2003, the SC issued an order that no further construction should take place within the Fort area. The SC also directed the Delhi government, Delhi Development Authority, Municipal Corporation of Delhi and the Police to assist the ASI in preventing any unauthorised construction from taking place in the area.

In September 2011, the SC directed ASI to take action against unauthorised constructions in the Fort, and submit a report within eight weeks. The next month, the court directed the ASI to submit an affidavit stating the number of houses that were present in the area based on an aerial survey conducted in 1993.

The ASI filed this affidavit in 2012 but also stated it was unable to complete the survey due to lack of capacity.

In 2016, the SC transferred the case to the High Court, stating that the matter now needed monitoring for compliance with its orders for removal of unauthorised constructions from the Fort.

In 2017, the Delhi High Court formed a committee to find a solution to this matter.

In November 2022, the High Court gave ASI six weeks' notice to file a status report on the matter. The court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to assist in the removal and ordered the BSES electricity board, to disconnect the electrical connections before demolition.

Residents filed an initial petition in the High Court on 25 January to stay the demolition. The judge dismissed the plea and upheld the mandate of the 2016 Supreme Court ruling.

In February 2023, the Mazdoor Awaaz Samiti, representing the residents of Tughlaqabad filed a subsequent petition demanding rehabilitation before demolition.

The High Court directed the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi, Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board, and Delhi Development Authority, to submit a rehabilitation plan to the court so that the phased resettlement of all residents could begin. It also directed the Chief Secretary to convene a meeting with senior officials from all these agencies, ASI, Delhi police, and the relevant district magistrate on February 20th, and submit a plan within four weeks.

However, the court did not grant a stay on the demolition till the said plan is submitted to the court.

On 24 April 2023, the High Court once again directed ASI to remove encroachments from the Fort area. On 30 April and 1 May 2023, a massive demolition drive was conducted by ASI over two days, rendering nearly 1000 families homeless. A resident of Tughlaqabad informed LCW that residents were not given any prior warning to the demolition which continued till nearly 9 p.m. and through the rain. He further added that no temporary accommodation or rehabilitation measures have been provided to the residents that have been impacted as a result of this eviction.

The case filed by Mazdoor Awaas Samiti is still being heard in the High Court and is listed for 16 May 2023. With no place to go, the residents currently live in make-shift shelters around the demolished sites, the resident told LCW.

Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Common

Type of Common Land

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

Detention

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Released from detention

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

1. Male police beating female protestors. Few women police personnel were present.

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Legal Data

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Legislations/Policies Involved

Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958
Section 2 [Defines an ancient monument as an archaeological site that has been in existence for more than 100 years] Section 3 [All monuments and archaeological sites notified under this Act are deemed to be of national importance] Section 19 [Prohibits construction of houses and construction activities within the protected and confers powers with the Central Government to remove any such encroachment within a specified period] Section 20B [Declares a distance of 200 meters in all directions of the protected monument as a regulated area]
Ancient Monuments Preservation Act, 1904
Rule 38 [Authorises the Central Government to remove any the owner or occupier of an unauthorized building in a prohibited area or in a regulated area through an order]
Delhi Slum & JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015
Section 2 [The Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board has the power to notify Jhuggi Jhopri Bastis by notification] Section 9 [The Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board has the power to make a survey of any Jhuggi Jhopri Basti. The aim of these surveys is ascertaining the number of residents as well as health, sanitation and civic amenities] Section 12 [The Board has the power to make schemes for collective community rehabilitation for residents of Jhuggi Jhopri Bastis affected by redevelopment]
Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board Act, 2010
Section 2 [The Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board has the power to notify Jhuggi Jhopri Bastis by notification] Section 9 [The Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board has the power to make a survey of any Jhuggi Jhopri Basti. The aim of these surveys is ascertaining the number of residents as well as health, sanitation and civic amenities] Section 12 [The Board has the power to make schemes for collective community rehabilitation for residents of Jhuggi Jhopri Bastis affected by redevelopment]
Sudama Singh v. Deepak Mohan Spolia (C.A. No(s). 21806-21807/2017, Supreme Court)
The High Court in the case had directed that before any eviction, the relevant authority must identify evictees eligible for relocation and rehabilitation. The state authorities must also ensure that basic civic liberties are ensured at the site of relocation. The Supreme Court confirmed this decision and stated that the directions passed in the High Court judgment must be complied with precisely.
Report of the Special Rapporteur on Adequate Housing, A/HRC/RES/43/14, dated July 6, 2020
The Guidelines state that the government must provide just compensation and sufficient accommodation to evictees immediately. At a minimum, the government must provide access to basic facilities such as food, water, and shelter, among others.
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

No

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Non-rehabilitation of displaced people

Forced evictions/dispossession of land

Non-consultation with stakeholders

Legal Status:

In Court

Status of Case In Court

Pending

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

No

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

High Court of Delhi

Case Number

W.P.(C) 1475/2001, W.P.(C) 1160/2023

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

On February 2023, the Delhi High Court directed that a meeting should be conducted between the GNCTD with senior officials from DDA and other government bodies to consider the rehabilitation of the residents of the Tughlakabad Fort area. The DUSIB noted that the residents are not covered under the Delhi Slum and JJ Rehabilitation Policy, 2015 and at best can be provided shelter in DUSIB Shelter Homes. The matter has been adjourned repeatedly since then and is now slated to be heard on May 30, 2023. In another ongoing matter in the High Court (WP 1475/2001), ASI noted that it was helpless in removing encroachments around the Fort. In the most recent hearing, on April 24, 2023, the Court noted that ASI had already served 1248 notices for eviction. The Court directed that police force be used to remove encroachments. The matter is next slated to be heard on May 26, 2023.

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

Physical attack

Blackmail/threats/intimidation

Other harassment

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

No

Reported Details of the Violation:

1. On 15 January, hundreds of residents of Tughlaqabad Fort gathered on the Mehrauli - Badarpur Main Road to protest the eviction notices that had been put up by ASI on 11 January. During the protest, Delhi Police and the Central Reserve Police Force beat up and lathi charged several residents that were protesting - including women, many of whom were beaten up by male policemen. Protestors were also picked up by the police and put in the police buses and taken to the police station and released within a few hours. ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9FKEuEUF84&ab_channel=farhanaqeelzaidi, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y95ZWl9zMPE&t=1s&ab_channel=TheWire) 2. Since the notices were issued, the residents have been staging a continuous roadblock, which has been met with police resistance. The police have put up barricades surrounding the basti to prevent people from moving onto the road or outside the confines of the basti. 3. Regular Delhi Police and CRPF presence in the basti, harassing and threatening residents with evictions. 4. On 8th May, 2023, women residents of Tughlaqabad were protesting the clearing of the malba from the demolition site. 30-40 policemen picked up 10-12 women, put them in a police bus and beat them up severly.

Date of Violation

January 14, 2023

Location of Violation

Tughlaqabad Fort

Additional Information

Nature of Protest

Protests/marches

Blockades

Campaigns (grassroots organisations/press releases/media)

Complaints/petitions/letters/memorandums to officials

Media-based activism/alternative media

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Residents of Tughlaqabad, Mazdoor Awaaz Samiti

Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

Detention

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Released from detention

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

1. Male police beating female protestors. Few women police personnel were present.

Resources

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Images

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Video

On 11 January 2023, the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) issued eviction notices to families living in and around Tughlaqabad Fort in New Delhi. ASI, the nodal agency responsible for maintaining sites of historic importance, deemed the settlements in the area 'illegal encroachments' and in violation of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act of 1958 (AMASR Act).

The notice informed residents that demolition would begin within 15 days and directed them to vacate the premises by 26 January. It did not provide any information on rehabilitation or provisioning of temporary shelter for the residents.

The Tughlaqabad Fort is a centrally protected monument under the AMASR Act. The fort's walls, gateways, bastions, and internal and external buildings all fall within the definition of a 'protected' site.

Tughlaqabad Fort and the surrounding area is also home to a number of settlements. The eviction notices were served to residents of Bengali Colony, one of the largest settlements of the area, where most residents are daily-wage labourers or domestic workers. The residents claim they have lived there for decades.

A large section of the community living in the colony has migrated from West Bengal, Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. Many residents have even registered their houses under the Pradhan Mantri-Uday Scheme in December 2020, a scheme launched by the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs in 2019 to confer ownership rights to properties in 1,731 unauthorised colonies.

After receiving the notice, community members organised protests and roadblocks. But they have failed to get legal protection from the demolition, a member of AICCTU who has been protesting along with the residents told LCW.

The scale of the eviction prompted the Delhi Commission for the Protection of Children to take up the matter suo-moto. It wrote to ASI demanding the withdrawal of the order until adequate arrangements are made for the rehabilitation of the families and thousands of children living in Bengali Colony, adding that the eviction drive will severely affect children's education. An RTI application filed by LCW found that to date no orders have been issued by any government authority to suspend the eviction.

Community members claim that the presence of police and CRPF personnel in the area has increased after their protests began. The entrances and exits to the colony have been barricaded to control movement and prevent people from gathering. There have also been reports of use of police force against protesting residents, as well as routine harassment.

Some affected families even possess certificates showing that the land was allotted to them under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana.

The eviction notices come in the backdrop of a long-running litigation. A public interest litigation was filed by Mr. S.N. Bhardwaj, in the Delhi High Court in 2001 against the unauthorised constructions and encroachments in and around the fort. The High Court however disposed that petition.

Dissatisfied with the disposal, Bhardwaj approached the Supreme Court (SC) with a similar plea through a special leave petition.

In 2003, the SC issued an order that no further construction should take place within the Fort area. The SC also directed the Delhi government, Delhi Development Authority, Municipal Corporation of Delhi and the Police to assist the ASI in preventing any unauthorised construction from taking place in the area.

In September 2011, the SC directed ASI to take action against unauthorised constructions in the Fort, and submit a report within eight weeks. The next month, the court directed the ASI to submit an affidavit stating the number of houses that were present in the area based on an aerial survey conducted in 1993.

The ASI filed this affidavit in 2012 but also stated it was unable to complete the survey due to lack of capacity.

In 2016, the SC transferred the case to the High Court, stating that the matter now needed monitoring for compliance with its orders for removal of unauthorised constructions from the Fort.

In 2017, the Delhi High Court formed a committee to find a solution to this matter.

In November 2022, the High Court gave ASI six weeks' notice to file a status report on the matter. The court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to assist in the removal and ordered the BSES electricity board, to disconnect the electrical connections before demolition.

Residents filed an initial petition in the High Court on 25 January to stay the demolition. The judge dismissed the plea and upheld the mandate of the 2016 Supreme Court ruling.

In February 2023, the Mazdoor Awaaz Samiti, representing the residents of Tughlaqabad filed a subsequent petition demanding rehabilitation before demolition.

The High Court directed the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi, Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board, and Delhi Development Authority, to submit a rehabilitation plan to the court so that the phased resettlement of all residents could begin. It also directed the Chief Secretary to convene a meeting with senior officials from all these agencies, ASI, Delhi police, and the relevant district magistrate on February 20th, and submit a plan within four weeks.

However, the court did not grant a stay on the demolition till the said plan is submitted to the court.

On 24 April 2023, the High Court once again directed ASI to remove encroachments from the Fort area. On 30 April and 1 May 2023, a massive demolition drive was conducted by ASI over two days, rendering nearly 1000 families homeless. A resident of Tughlaqabad informed LCW that residents were not given any prior warning to the demolition which continued till nearly 9 p.m. and through the rain. He further added that no temporary accommodation or rehabilitation measures have been provided to the residents that have been impacted as a result of this eviction.

The case filed by Mazdoor Awaas Samiti is still being heard in the High Court and is listed for 16 May 2023. With no place to go, the residents currently live in make-shift shelters around the demolished sites, the resident told LCW.

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Common

Type of Common Land

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Legislations/Policies Involved

Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958
Section 2 [Defines an ancient monument as an archaeological site that has been in existence for more than 100 years] Section 3 [All monuments and archaeological sites notified under this Act are deemed to be of national importance] Section 19 [Prohibits construction of houses and construction activities within the protected and confers powers with the Central Government to remove any such encroachment within a specified period] Section 20B [Declares a distance of 200 meters in all directions of the protected monument as a regulated area]
Ancient Monuments Preservation Act, 1904
Rule 38 [Authorises the Central Government to remove any the owner or occupier of an unauthorized building in a prohibited area or in a regulated area through an order]
Delhi Slum & JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015
Section 2 [The Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board has the power to notify Jhuggi Jhopri Bastis by notification] Section 9 [The Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board has the power to make a survey of any Jhuggi Jhopri Basti. The aim of these surveys is ascertaining the number of residents as well as health, sanitation and civic amenities] Section 12 [The Board has the power to make schemes for collective community rehabilitation for residents of Jhuggi Jhopri Bastis affected by redevelopment]
Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board Act, 2010
Section 2 [The Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board has the power to notify Jhuggi Jhopri Bastis by notification] Section 9 [The Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board has the power to make a survey of any Jhuggi Jhopri Basti. The aim of these surveys is ascertaining the number of residents as well as health, sanitation and civic amenities] Section 12 [The Board has the power to make schemes for collective community rehabilitation for residents of Jhuggi Jhopri Bastis affected by redevelopment]
Sudama Singh v. Deepak Mohan Spolia (C.A. No(s). 21806-21807/2017, Supreme Court)
The High Court in the case had directed that before any eviction, the relevant authority must identify evictees eligible for relocation and rehabilitation. The state authorities must also ensure that basic civic liberties are ensured at the site of relocation. The Supreme Court confirmed this decision and stated that the directions passed in the High Court judgment must be complied with precisely.
Report of the Special Rapporteur on Adequate Housing, A/HRC/RES/43/14, dated July 6, 2020
The Guidelines state that the government must provide just compensation and sufficient accommodation to evictees immediately. At a minimum, the government must provide access to basic facilities such as food, water, and shelter, among others.
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

No

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Non-rehabilitation of displaced people

Forced evictions/dispossession of land

Non-consultation with stakeholders

Legal Status:

In Court

Status of Case In Court

Pending

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

No

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

High Court of Delhi

Case Number

W.P.(C) 1475/2001, W.P.(C) 1160/2023

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

On February 2023, the Delhi High Court directed that a meeting should be conducted between the GNCTD with senior officials from DDA and other government bodies to consider the rehabilitation of the residents of the Tughlakabad Fort area. The DUSIB noted that the residents are not covered under the Delhi Slum and JJ Rehabilitation Policy, 2015 and at best can be provided shelter in DUSIB Shelter Homes. The matter has been adjourned repeatedly since then and is now slated to be heard on May 30, 2023. In another ongoing matter in the High Court (WP 1475/2001), ASI noted that it was helpless in removing encroachments around the Fort. In the most recent hearing, on April 24, 2023, the Court noted that ASI had already served 1248 notices for eviction. The Court directed that police force be used to remove encroachments. The matter is next slated to be heard on May 26, 2023.

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

Physical attack

Blackmail/threats/intimidation

Other harassment

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

No

Reported Details of the Violation:

1. On 15 January, hundreds of residents of Tughlaqabad Fort gathered on the Mehrauli - Badarpur Main Road to protest the eviction notices that had been put up by ASI on 11 January. During the protest, Delhi Police and the Central Reserve Police Force beat up and lathi charged several residents that were protesting - including women, many of whom were beaten up by male policemen. Protestors were also picked up by the police and put in the police buses and taken to the police station and released within a few hours. ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9FKEuEUF84&ab_channel=farhanaqeelzaidi, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y95ZWl9zMPE&t=1s&ab_channel=TheWire) 2. Since the notices were issued, the residents have been staging a continuous roadblock, which has been met with police resistance. The police have put up barricades surrounding the basti to prevent people from moving onto the road or outside the confines of the basti. 3. Regular Delhi Police and CRPF presence in the basti, harassing and threatening residents with evictions. 4. On 8th May, 2023, women residents of Tughlaqabad were protesting the clearing of the malba from the demolition site. 30-40 policemen picked up 10-12 women, put them in a police bus and beat them up severly.

Date of Violation

January 14, 2023

Location of Violation

Tughlaqabad Fort

Nature of Protest

Protests/marches

Blockades

Campaigns (grassroots organisations/press releases/media)

Complaints/petitions/letters/memorandums to officials

Media-based activism/alternative media

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Residents of Tughlaqabad, Mazdoor Awaaz Samiti

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Documented By

Text Link

Reviewed By

Text Link

Updated By

Text Link

Edited By

Text LinkLand Conflict Watch

Other Land Conflicts in Delhi

cross
Not a member yet?
Sign up now