Madhya Pradesh
Musamudhi
,
Bhumka
,
Sidhi
Published :
Jan 2017
|
Updated :
September 19, 2025
Adivasi resistance and unresolved compensation issues in the abandoned thermal power project of Sidhi, Madhya Pradesh
Reported by
Arpit Deshmukh
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
500
People affected
2009
Year started
445.16
ha.
Land area affected
Households affected
500
People Affected
2009
Year started
445.16
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Thermal Power Plant
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Unclassifed
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Thermal Power Plant
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In 2009, ACB (India) Limited, a coal beneficiation private company, signed an Memorandum of Understanding with the Government of Madhya Pradesh for setting up a 1200 megawatt thermal power plant at Bhumka and Musamudhi villages in Majhauli tehsil in Sidhi district. The government acquired 1,100 acres land for the project and paid compensation much lesser than the market rate. In fact, the government transferred the compensation amount directly to the bank account of 40 landowners. The landowners, mostly Adivasis, are unhappy with the low compensation of Rs 60,000- Rs 80,000 per acre.

Umesh Tiwari, convener of the Toko Roko Thoko Kranti Morcha, said, "The whole fight is about exploitation." He added that only when the company will provide revised compensation as per the LARR Act, 2013, and not the 1894 Land Acquisition Act will the framers and the organisation give their land for the project. In 2017, hundreds of framers joined in a protest against the land acquisition for the power plant.

Due to these bottlenecks, the work had not started till 2020. LCW spoke to Rajkumar Sinha of the National Alliance of People's Movement on 30 July 2020. He said that the Adivasis have still not given up their land, even though on paper it says that the land has been acquired and compensation given. Meanwhile, the affected people organised a conference on 29 September 2019, to get back their land officially while transferring back the compensation.

In 2019, a Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) ruling noted that the project had been abandoned. According to the briefing of Department of Public Relations (Government of MP) held on 26 April 2022, M/s Aryan M.P. Power Generation Pvt. Ltd. (a subsidiary of ACB) had sought permission for change of land use for setting up of 300 megawatt solar power project on land (374.17 hectares). The company had sought this permission, due to non-receipt of environmental clearance and coal linkage for the thermal power plant.

Prior to this, the MP Cabinet had approved setting up of 300 MW capacity solar power project on the land acquired by M/s Aryan in the past for thermal power project, terminating the contract executed for thermal power project retrospectively dated 24 August 2013. The company is in process of seeking regulatory approvals and no work had started on ground for setting up of solar power project, as on August 2025.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for more compensation than promised

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Private

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project stalled due to protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Data Unavailable

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

5809

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2009

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

ACB (India) Limited, Aryan M.P. Power Generation Private Limited

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Toko Roko Thoko Kranti Morcha

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Arpit Deshmukh
Show more work
Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for more compensation than promised

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project stalled due to protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Data Unavailable

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us