JOIN THE LCW
COMMUNITY

Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, quarterly analytics report, curated expert talks, merchandise and much more. Support our work!

Sign up today

Union Cabinet approves Vadhavan port project in Maharashtra despite protests

Reported by

Stella James

Legal Review by

Edited by

Anupa Sagar Kujur

Updated by

Updated by

Shubham Kothari

Published on

July 12, 2017

July 15, 2024

Edited on

July 12, 2017

Sector

Infrastructure

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Port

Starting Year

2015

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

2000

ha

Households Affected by Conflict

5208

People Affected by Conflict

25000

State

Maharashtra

Sector

Infrastructure

People Affected by Conflict

25000

Households Affected by Conflict

5208

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

2000

ha

Starting Year

2015

Location of Conflict

Vadhwan

Varor, Gungwada, Wadapokhran

Palghar

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Port

Land Conflict Summary

In 2015, Maharashtra's Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust (JNPT), which handles more than half of India's shipping cargo, proposed to build a port near Vadhvan in Dahanu, to be jointly administered by JNPT (74 per cent stake) and the Maharashtra Maritime Board (26 per cent stake). The location at Vadhwan was chosen because of its connectivity to the western line network that will facilitate the Delhi-Mumbai Freight Corridor project.

Earlier in 1998, the port was to be developed by Peninsular and Oriental Australia Ports Private Limited but did not take off due to protests over environmental concerns and displacement of the local fishing community. However, for this project, it was decided to reclaim land from the sea rather than private land to prevent conflict over acquisition. But this time too, soon after the proposal, the project was shelved due to pressure from the local people and various environmental groups.

In December 2015, around 25,000 fisherfolk staged a massive protest at the Palghar collector’s office. The protesters said that the project would cause huge damage to the marine environment and also affect the daily livelihood of the local fisherfolk as fishing would be prohibited in the region. The project was stalled since Dahanu was still an eco-sensitive zone (ESZ), and no construction could happen unless it was de-notified.

In 2016, the Maharashtra government asked the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) to exclude the proposed port from the ESZ category. The region was notified ESZ in 1991 by the environment ministry after a Supreme Court order. In September 2019, the MoEFCC filed a petition in the Supreme Court demanding the ESZ status of Dahanu to be scrapped.

In October 2019, the residents of Vadhvan and Varor villages completely boycotted the Assembly polls to protest against the port.

In February 2020, the MoEFCC granted "in-principle" approval to the construction of the port and in July 2020, JNPT applied to an Expert Appraisal Committee of the MoEFCC for environmental and coastal regulation zone clearance.

In February 2024, at least 3,000 villagers [blocked](https://indiashippingnews.com/villagers-block-mumbai-ahmedabad-highway-for-opposing-vadhavan-port/#:~:text=Villagers block Mumbai-Ahmedabad Highway for opposing Vadhavan Port,-Feb 24%2C 2024&text=MUMBAI %3A Around 3%2C000 villagers opposing,the way up to Bhayandar) the Mumbai-Ahmedabad Highway in protest against the port. On 18 April 2024, the Bombay High Court upheld the July 2023 order passed by the Dahanu Taluka Environment Protection Authority (DTEPA) allowing JNPA to develop a greenfield port at Vadhavan in Palghar district stating that the DTEPA has taken ‘all relevant aspects into consideration’.

On 19 June 2024, the Union Cabinet approved the Rs 76,220-crore Vadhavan Port project in Maharashtra after months of deliberations. The total project area is 17,471 hectares, including 16,906 hectares of port area and the remaining 571 hectares earmarked for ancillary activities.

Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Type of Common Land

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

2017

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Water bodies, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

76200

Type of investment:

Revised Investment

Year of Estimation

2024

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Legal Data

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Environmental Laws

Legislations/Policies Involved

Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006
Sections 2 [New port projects require prior environmental clearance from the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change]; Section 5 [An Expert Appraisal Committee shall have the power to screen, scope and appraise projects which require clearance]; Section 6 [An application seeking prior environmental clearance shall be made before commencing any construction activity or preparation of land]; 7(III) [A public consultation shall be conducted through which the concerns of the local affected persons who have a stake in the environmental impacts of the project are ascertained]; Section 8 [Based on its observations, the Expert Appraisal Committee may recommend that the clearance be granted/rejected by the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change]
Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 2011
Regulation 4 [The construction and operation of ports and harbours in Coastal Regulation Zones shall be regulated]; Regulation 4.2 [All projects that are regulated under this notification shall obtain prior CRZ clearance from the concerned State Coastal Zone Management Authority]; Regulation 8 [No new construction shall be permitted in CRZ-I zones (which include ecologically sensitive areas)]
Environment Protection Rules, 1986
Section 3 [The Union government shall have the power to take all measures it deems necessary for protecting and improving the quality of the environment]
Environment Protection Rules, 1986
Section 5(1) [While restricting the location of operations in different areas, the Union government may take into consideration factors such as the biological diversity of the area, net adverse environmental impact, proximity to human settlements, etc.]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

No items found.

Legal Status:

In Court

Status of Case In Court

Pending

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Supreme Court of India

Case Number

WP(C) 231/1994, MA 1169/2019 in W.P.(C) No. 231/1994

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

In Writ Petition(Civil) 231 of 1994, the Supreme Court directed that in order to address the complex issues of planning and management of ecologically fragile areas such as Dahanu tehsil, it is prudent that the Union government considers setting up an authority under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, and confers on this authority all the powers necessary to deal with the situation created in the Dahanu region and other environmentally sensitive regions in India. The authority should be headed by a retired judge of the Supreme Court and may have other members — with expertise in the field of hydrology, oceanography, terrestrial and aquatic ecology, environmental engineering, developmental and environmental planning and information technology.

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

No items found.

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Additional Information

Nature of Protest

Complaints/petitions/letters/memorandums to officials

Development of a network or collective

Public campaign

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways, Maharashtra Maritime Board

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Fisherfolk, Wadhwan Bunder Virodhi Sangharsh Samiti

Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Resources

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Images

Map of coastal clearance

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Video

In 2015, Maharashtra's Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust (JNPT), which handles more than half of India's shipping cargo, proposed to build a port near Vadhvan in Dahanu, to be jointly administered by JNPT (74 per cent stake) and the Maharashtra Maritime Board (26 per cent stake). The location at Vadhwan was chosen because of its connectivity to the western line network that will facilitate the Delhi-Mumbai Freight Corridor project.

Earlier in 1998, the port was to be developed by Peninsular and Oriental Australia Ports Private Limited but did not take off due to protests over environmental concerns and displacement of the local fishing community. However, for this project, it was decided to reclaim land from the sea rather than private land to prevent conflict over acquisition. But this time too, soon after the proposal, the project was shelved due to pressure from the local people and various environmental groups.

In December 2015, around 25,000 fisherfolk staged a massive protest at the Palghar collector’s office. The protesters said that the project would cause huge damage to the marine environment and also affect the daily livelihood of the local fisherfolk as fishing would be prohibited in the region. The project was stalled since Dahanu was still an eco-sensitive zone (ESZ), and no construction could happen unless it was de-notified.

In 2016, the Maharashtra government asked the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) to exclude the proposed port from the ESZ category. The region was notified ESZ in 1991 by the environment ministry after a Supreme Court order. In September 2019, the MoEFCC filed a petition in the Supreme Court demanding the ESZ status of Dahanu to be scrapped.

In October 2019, the residents of Vadhvan and Varor villages completely boycotted the Assembly polls to protest against the port.

In February 2020, the MoEFCC granted "in-principle" approval to the construction of the port and in July 2020, JNPT applied to an Expert Appraisal Committee of the MoEFCC for environmental and coastal regulation zone clearance.

In February 2024, at least 3,000 villagers [blocked](https://indiashippingnews.com/villagers-block-mumbai-ahmedabad-highway-for-opposing-vadhavan-port/#:~:text=Villagers block Mumbai-Ahmedabad Highway for opposing Vadhavan Port,-Feb 24%2C 2024&text=MUMBAI %3A Around 3%2C000 villagers opposing,the way up to Bhayandar) the Mumbai-Ahmedabad Highway in protest against the port. On 18 April 2024, the Bombay High Court upheld the July 2023 order passed by the Dahanu Taluka Environment Protection Authority (DTEPA) allowing JNPA to develop a greenfield port at Vadhavan in Palghar district stating that the DTEPA has taken ‘all relevant aspects into consideration’.

On 19 June 2024, the Union Cabinet approved the Rs 76,220-crore Vadhavan Port project in Maharashtra after months of deliberations. The total project area is 17,471 hectares, including 16,906 hectares of port area and the remaining 571 hectares earmarked for ancillary activities.

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Type of Common Land

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

Total investment involved (in Crores):

76200

Type of investment:

Revised Investment

Year of Estimation

2024

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Environmental Laws

Legislations/Policies Involved

Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006
Sections 2 [New port projects require prior environmental clearance from the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change]; Section 5 [An Expert Appraisal Committee shall have the power to screen, scope and appraise projects which require clearance]; Section 6 [An application seeking prior environmental clearance shall be made before commencing any construction activity or preparation of land]; 7(III) [A public consultation shall be conducted through which the concerns of the local affected persons who have a stake in the environmental impacts of the project are ascertained]; Section 8 [Based on its observations, the Expert Appraisal Committee may recommend that the clearance be granted/rejected by the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change]
Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 2011
Regulation 4 [The construction and operation of ports and harbours in Coastal Regulation Zones shall be regulated]; Regulation 4.2 [All projects that are regulated under this notification shall obtain prior CRZ clearance from the concerned State Coastal Zone Management Authority]; Regulation 8 [No new construction shall be permitted in CRZ-I zones (which include ecologically sensitive areas)]
Environment Protection Rules, 1986
Section 3 [The Union government shall have the power to take all measures it deems necessary for protecting and improving the quality of the environment]
Environment Protection Rules, 1986
Section 5(1) [While restricting the location of operations in different areas, the Union government may take into consideration factors such as the biological diversity of the area, net adverse environmental impact, proximity to human settlements, etc.]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

No items found.

Legal Status:

In Court

Status of Case In Court

Pending

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Supreme Court of India

Case Number

WP(C) 231/1994, MA 1169/2019 in W.P.(C) No. 231/1994

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

In Writ Petition(Civil) 231 of 1994, the Supreme Court directed that in order to address the complex issues of planning and management of ecologically fragile areas such as Dahanu tehsil, it is prudent that the Union government considers setting up an authority under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, and confers on this authority all the powers necessary to deal with the situation created in the Dahanu region and other environmentally sensitive regions in India. The authority should be headed by a retired judge of the Supreme Court and may have other members — with expertise in the field of hydrology, oceanography, terrestrial and aquatic ecology, environmental engineering, developmental and environmental planning and information technology.

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

No items found.

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Nature of Protest

Complaints/petitions/letters/memorandums to officials

Development of a network or collective

Public campaign

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways, Maharashtra Maritime Board

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Fisherfolk, Wadhwan Bunder Virodhi Sangharsh Samiti

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:
Map of coastal clearance

Map of coastal clearance

Image Credit:  

Map of coastal clearance

Image Credit:  

Documented By

Text Link

Reviewed By

Text Link

Updated By

Text Link

Edited By

Text LinkLand Conflict Watch

Other Land Conflicts in Maharashtra

cross
Not a member yet?
Sign up now