Legal Data by
June 13, 2017
June 13, 2017
June 13, 2017
The government initiated a multipurpose dam in Tehri Garhwal district in 1962, and 40 villages were displaced to construct it. In 1979, the displaced were rehabilitated to Pathri Part 1, 2, 3 and 4 in Haridwar. The outsees rehabilitated have not been provided with land rights on the rehabilitated land nor do they have basic amenities, such as healthcare and transport. They have been demanding land rights for at least 35 years to every state government in power, but no one paid heed. Due to lack of legal rights over the land, the outsees have been unable to avail any government facility, such as ration card and subsidies, or apply for bank loans. They have no property documents, although in 2004, some families received an occupancy certificate. In 2015, four decades after their struggle, the Uttarakhand government finally recognised three villages as revenue villages. With this recognition, these villages are now entitled to land rights and basic amenities, such as electricity, water, health services, educational institutions and banks. The three villages belong to Pathri Part 2, 3 and 4 and have been renamed Tehri Bhagirathi Nagar, Ghonti Village and Chhaam by the district magistrate. But the villages in Part 1 are yet to get a revenue village status. In 2017, a delegation of the affected people met with officials of the Tehri Hydro Power Corporation to tell them about their problems after resettlement, following which efforts were made to form village panchayats in the area to undertake developmental work. Nine villages that were displaced were declared revenue villages in August 2020, making them eligible for government schemes. As of October 2020, six panchayats were formed.
Demand for legal recognition of land rights
Forest and Non-Forest
Total investment involved (in Crores):
Type of investment:
Year of Estimation
Page Number In Investment Document:
Has the Conflict Ended?
When did it end?
Why did the conflict end?
Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict
Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute
What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?
What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?
Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:
Non-rehabilitation of displaced people
Out of Court
Status of Case In Court
Whether any adjudicatory body was approached
Name of the adjudicatory body
Name(s) of the Court(s)
Main Reasoning/Decision of court
Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:
Whether criminal law was used against protestors:
Reported Details of the Violation:
Date of Violation
Location of Violation
Nature of Protest
Complaints/petitions/letters/memorandums to officials
Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:
PSUs Involved in the Conflict:
Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?
Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached
Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:
Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?
Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict: