JOIN THE LCW
COMMUNITY

Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, quarterly analytics report, curated expert talks, merchandise and much more. Support our work!

Sign up today

Police, Forest Department Allegedly Assault Baiga Community in Chhattisgarh, Evict 150 Households

Reported by

Deepika Joshi

Legal Review by

Edited by

Updated by

Published on

November 4, 2020

May 17, 2022

Edited on

November 4, 2020

State

Chhattisgarh

Sector

Conservation and Forestry

People Affected by Conflict

720

Households Affected by Conflict

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

121

ha

Starting Year

2002

Location of Conflict

Nagadabra and Tandidahra villages in Pandariya Block

Kabirdham

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Forest Administration (Other than Protected Areas)

Land Conflict Summary

In 2016, the Joint Forest Management Committee (JFMC) of Kodwagodan and Mathpur panchayats, in collusion with the state forest department, allegedly destroyed crops and fenced agricultural land in Nagadabra village located in Pandariya block. The forest department also took away grazing animals of the farmers and returned them only after being bribed. From 2017 to 2019, multiple incidents of violence took place in Nagadabra when the police teamed up with the forest and revenue departments and destroyed houses and beat up people. The authorities claim that the Nagadabra residents have settled on land for which they do not have title deeds. The residents, on the other hand, refute this allegation. Faglu Baiga, the village head and one of the first persons to migrate from the hills to settle in Nagadabra, showed LCW his land deeds/patta to prove his ownership. However, he adds that the situation is complicated as the people have been given land deeds for plots adjacent to the land where they reside, creating confusion over ownership. Violence also broke out in the new hamlet of Tandidahra adjacent to Nagadabra. After the monsoons in 2016, about 75 families from the Baiga community settled in Tandidahra after receiving written permission from the sub divisional magistrate, hoping to eventually get title deeds for the land. This settlement was also attacked thrice from 2017 to 2019 by the JFMC of Kodwagodan and Mathpur panchayats, forest department, revenue department and the police. The residents were assaulted, newly made huts were burnt, water sources were destroyed, land was bulldozed and agricultural equipment and mobile phones were confiscated. In July 2018, the villagers were evicted the authorities forcefully corralled them and their cattle into trucks and dropped them off in a faraway village. At least 150 households (75 each in Nagadabra and Tandidahra) have been affected by the crackdown by the administration. Almost all of these families are from the Baiga tribe, listed as PVTG (particularly vulnerable tribal group). When the villagers and local activists protested against the violence, they were assaulted and beaten up by the police. Various complaints were also lodged at the block, district and state levels over the years. But no significant action has been taken, except for a report sent by the State SC/ST Commission in 2017 to various district authorities after conducting an inquiry, in which it asked the district authorities to resolve the issue after discussing with the communities and to provide land to the families instead of evicting them. The protesters too have demanded a stop to the violence by the forest, revenue and police departments, resolution of confusion over _pattas _for adjacent plots of land in Nagadabra and resettlement of the 75 families from Tandidahra. They have not taken any legal recourse yet. On September 17, 2020, the state authorities again destroyed standing crops grown by farmers in Nagadabra and let animals loose on the fields. The villagers submitted written complaints to the district collector, police and the forest department. "We grow crops in the hope that we will earn our own food and yet they are destroyed," one of the residents told LCW. They are now trying to file a public interest litigation at the Chhattisgarh high court. Meanwhile, the households that were trying to settle in Tandidahra have moved back to their native villages of Birhuldeeh, Fifdi and Karhalu in the hills, to name a few, for fear of violence by state authorities and neighbouring panchayats, although they have not abandoned their claim on the land.

Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand for promised land

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Both

Type of Common Land

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Legal Data

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Constitutional Law, Forest and Scheduled Area Governance Laws, Other

Legislations/Policies Involved

Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006
Section 4(5) [No member of a forest-dwelling Schedule Tribe or other traditional forest dweller shall be evicted from forestland under his possession till the recognition and verification of forest rights and titles is complete]; Section 7 [Where any authority contravenes the provisions of this Act, they shall be liable to be proceeded against and be subjected to a fine]
Constitution of India, 1950
Article 21 [No person shall be deprived of his/her right to life and liberty]
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
Section 3(1)(g) [Whoever wrongfully dispossesses a member of a Scheduled Tribe from his land or destroys the crops shall be punishable with imprisonment and a fine]; Section 3(1)(z) [Whoever forces or causes a member of a Scheduled Tribe to leave his house, village or place of residence shall be punishable with imprisonment and a fine]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Forced evictions/dispossession of land

Land record discrepancies

Non-implementation/violation of FRA

Non-rehabilitation of displaced people

Lack of legal protection over land rights

Legal Status:

Out of Court

Status of Case In Court

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

Yes

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Case Number

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

Displacement

Torching of houses

Other harassment

Physical attack

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

Reported Details of the Violation:

From 2017 to 2019, the police, along with the forest department, evicted more than 70 Baiga families. They burnt houses, bulldozed land, confisctated mobile phones and assaulted the tribe members when they protested.

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Nagadabra, Tandidahra

Additional Information

Nature of Protest

Campaigns (grassroots organisations/press releases/media)

Complaints/petitions/letters/memorandums to officials

Protests/marches

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Forest Department, Revenue Department

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Resources

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Images

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Video

In 2016, the Joint Forest Management Committee (JFMC) of Kodwagodan and Mathpur panchayats, in collusion with the state forest department, allegedly destroyed crops and fenced agricultural land in Nagadabra village located in Pandariya block. The forest department also took away grazing animals of the farmers and returned them only after being bribed. From 2017 to 2019, multiple incidents of violence took place in Nagadabra when the police teamed up with the forest and revenue departments and destroyed houses and beat up people. The authorities claim that the Nagadabra residents have settled on land for which they do not have title deeds. The residents, on the other hand, refute this allegation. Faglu Baiga, the village head and one of the first persons to migrate from the hills to settle in Nagadabra, showed LCW his land deeds/patta to prove his ownership. However, he adds that the situation is complicated as the people have been given land deeds for plots adjacent to the land where they reside, creating confusion over ownership. Violence also broke out in the new hamlet of Tandidahra adjacent to Nagadabra. After the monsoons in 2016, about 75 families from the Baiga community settled in Tandidahra after receiving written permission from the sub divisional magistrate, hoping to eventually get title deeds for the land. This settlement was also attacked thrice from 2017 to 2019 by the JFMC of Kodwagodan and Mathpur panchayats, forest department, revenue department and the police. The residents were assaulted, newly made huts were burnt, water sources were destroyed, land was bulldozed and agricultural equipment and mobile phones were confiscated. In July 2018, the villagers were evicted the authorities forcefully corralled them and their cattle into trucks and dropped them off in a faraway village. At least 150 households (75 each in Nagadabra and Tandidahra) have been affected by the crackdown by the administration. Almost all of these families are from the Baiga tribe, listed as PVTG (particularly vulnerable tribal group). When the villagers and local activists protested against the violence, they were assaulted and beaten up by the police. Various complaints were also lodged at the block, district and state levels over the years. But no significant action has been taken, except for a report sent by the State SC/ST Commission in 2017 to various district authorities after conducting an inquiry, in which it asked the district authorities to resolve the issue after discussing with the communities and to provide land to the families instead of evicting them. The protesters too have demanded a stop to the violence by the forest, revenue and police departments, resolution of confusion over _pattas _for adjacent plots of land in Nagadabra and resettlement of the 75 families from Tandidahra. They have not taken any legal recourse yet. On September 17, 2020, the state authorities again destroyed standing crops grown by farmers in Nagadabra and let animals loose on the fields. The villagers submitted written complaints to the district collector, police and the forest department. "We grow crops in the hope that we will earn our own food and yet they are destroyed," one of the residents told LCW. They are now trying to file a public interest litigation at the Chhattisgarh high court. Meanwhile, the households that were trying to settle in Tandidahra have moved back to their native villages of Birhuldeeh, Fifdi and Karhalu in the hills, to name a few, for fear of violence by state authorities and neighbouring panchayats, although they have not abandoned their claim on the land.

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand for promised land

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Both

Type of Common Land

Forest and Non-Forest

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Constitutional Law, Forest and Scheduled Area Governance Laws, Other

Legislations/Policies Involved

Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006
Section 4(5) [No member of a forest-dwelling Schedule Tribe or other traditional forest dweller shall be evicted from forestland under his possession till the recognition and verification of forest rights and titles is complete]; Section 7 [Where any authority contravenes the provisions of this Act, they shall be liable to be proceeded against and be subjected to a fine]
Constitution of India, 1950
Article 21 [No person shall be deprived of his/her right to life and liberty]
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
Section 3(1)(g) [Whoever wrongfully dispossesses a member of a Scheduled Tribe from his land or destroys the crops shall be punishable with imprisonment and a fine]; Section 3(1)(z) [Whoever forces or causes a member of a Scheduled Tribe to leave his house, village or place of residence shall be punishable with imprisonment and a fine]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Forced evictions/dispossession of land

Land record discrepancies

Non-implementation/violation of FRA

Non-rehabilitation of displaced people

Lack of legal protection over land rights

Legal Status:

Out of Court

Status of Case In Court

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

Yes

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Case Number

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

Displacement

Torching of houses

Other harassment

Physical attack

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

Reported Details of the Violation:

From 2017 to 2019, the police, along with the forest department, evicted more than 70 Baiga families. They burnt houses, bulldozed land, confisctated mobile phones and assaulted the tribe members when they protested.

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Nagadabra, Tandidahra

Nature of Protest

Campaigns (grassroots organisations/press releases/media)

Complaints/petitions/letters/memorandums to officials

Protests/marches

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Forest Department, Revenue Department

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Documented By

Text Link

Reviewed By

Text Link

Updated By

Text Link

Edited By

Text LinkLand Conflict Watch

Other Land Conflicts in Chhattisgarh

cross
Not a member yet?
Sign up now