Police, Forest Department Allegedly Assault Baiga Community in Chhattisgarh, Evict 150 Households

Reported by

Deepika JoshiLand Conflict Watch

Last updated on

September 13, 2021

Location of Conflict

Nagadabra and Tandidahra villages in Pandariya Block


This is a Left Wing Extremism Affected District

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Forest Administration (Other than Protected Areas)



People Affected by Conflict


Land Area Affected (in Hectares)



Starting Year





Conservation and Forestry

In 2016, the Joint Forest Management Committee (JFMC) of Kodwagodan and Mathpur panchayats, in collusion with the state forest department, allegedly destroyed crops and fenced agricultural land in Nagadabra village located in Pandariya block. The forest department also took away grazing animals of the farmers and returned them only after being bribed. From 2017 to 2019, multiple incidents of violence took place in Nagadabra when the police teamed up with the forest and revenue departments and destroyed houses and beat up people. The authorities claim that the Nagadabra residents have settled on land for which they do not have title deeds. The residents, on the other hand, refute this allegation. Faglu Baiga, the village head and one of the first persons to migrate from the hills to settle in Nagadabra, showed LCW his land deeds/patta to prove his ownership. However, he adds that the situation is complicated as the people have been given land deeds for plots adjacent to the land where they reside, creating confusion over ownership. Violence also broke out in the new hamlet of Tandidahra adjacent to Nagadabra. After the monsoons in 2016, about 75 families from the Baiga community settled in Tandidahra after receiving written permission from the sub divisional magistrate, hoping to eventually get title deeds for the land. This settlement was also attacked thrice from 2017 to 2019 by the JFMC of Kodwagodan and Mathpur panchayats, forest department, revenue department and the police. The residents were assaulted, newly made huts were burnt, water sources were destroyed, land was bulldozed and agricultural equipment and mobile phones were confiscated. In July 2018, the villagers were evicted the authorities forcefully corralled them and their cattle into trucks and dropped them off in a faraway village. At least 150 households (75 each in Nagadabra and Tandidahra) have been affected by the crackdown by the administration. Almost all of these families are from the Baiga tribe, listed as PVTG (particularly vulnerable tribal group). When the villagers and local activists protested against the violence, they were assaulted and beaten up by the police. Various complaints were also lodged at the block, district and state levels over the years. But no significant action has been taken, except for a report sent by the State SC/ST Commission in 2017 to various district authorities after conducting an inquiry, in which it asked the district authorities to resolve the issue after discussing with the communities and to provide land to the families instead of evicting them. The protesters too have demanded a stop to the violence by the forest, revenue and police departments, resolution of confusion over _pattas _for adjacent plots of land in Nagadabra and resettlement of the 75 families from Tandidahra. They have not taken any legal recourse yet. On September 17, 2020, the state authorities again destroyed standing crops grown by farmers in Nagadabra and let animals loose on the fields. The villagers submitted written complaints to the district collector, police and the forest department. "We grow crops in the hope that we will earn our own food and yet they are destroyed," one of the residents told LCW. They are now trying to file a public interest litigation at the Chhattisgarh high court. Meanwhile, the households that were trying to settle in Tandidahra have moved back to their native villages of Birhuldeeh, Fifdi and Karhalu in the hills, to name a few, for fear of violence by state authorities and neighbouring panchayats, although they have not abandoned their claim on the land.

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights, Demand for promised land, Complaint against procedural violations

Region Classification


Type of Land


Type of Common Land

Forest and Non-Forest

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Has the Conflict Ended?


When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Constitutional Law, Forest and Scheduled Area Governance Laws, Other

Legislations/Policies Involved

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community? What was the decision of the concerned government department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Forced evictions/ Dispossession of Land, Land-record discrepancies , Non-implementation/violation of the FRA, Non-rehabilitation of displaced people, Lack of legal protection over land rights

Legal Status:

Out of Court

Status of Case In Court

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Case Number

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

Displacement, Torching of houses, Threats/intimidation, Other harassment, Physical attack

Whether criminal law was used against protestors

Official name of the criminal law. Did the case reach trial?

Reported Details of the Violation:

From 2017 to 2019, the police, along with the forest department, evicted more than 70 Baiga families. They burnt houses, bulldozed land, confisctated mobile phones and assaulted the tribe members when they protested.

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Nagadabra, Tandidahra

Nature of Protest

Campaigns (Grassroots organisations/press releases/media), Complaints, petitions, memorandums to officials , Protests/marches

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Forest Department, Revenue Department

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of Corporate Authorities Approached

Other Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:
No Images Available

Documented By

Deepika Joshi

Reviewed By

Deepika Joshi

Updated By

Deepika Joshi

Edited By

Deepika JoshiLand Conflict Watch

Support our work

Your contribution ensures continuity of this crucial project.

As a member, you will get exclusive access to special reports, policy papers and research projects undertaken by Land Conflict Watch and behind-the-scenes interactions with the writers and researchers about their work.
Contribute Now