JOIN THE LCW
COMMUNITY

Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, quarterly analytics report, curated expert talks, merchandise and much more. Support our work!

Sign up today

People oppose expansion of stone quarry mining in peri urban Hyderabad, demand pending compensation

Reported by

Shalini

Legal Review by

Anmol Gupta, Mukta Joshi

Edited by

Radhika Chatterjee

Updated by

Published on

March 14, 2023

March 22, 2023

Edited on

March 14, 2023

State

Telangana

Sector

Mining

People Affected by Conflict

Households Affected by Conflict

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

10

ha

Starting Year

2022

Location of Conflict

Bandaravirala

Chinnaravirala, Guvvaleti, Taramatipet, Saddupalli, Desmukhi Villages of Abdullapurmet Mandal, Bhudan Pochampalli Mandal of Yadradri-Bhuvanagiri

Ranga Reddy

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Other Kind of Mining

Health Hazards and pollution due to mining quarries, stone crushers, hot mix plants and also Illegal Mining

Land Conflict Summary

In January 2022, a petition was filed in the National Green Tribunal (NGT) against the companies that were conducting mining and stone quarrying in Chinna Ravirala village and its surrounding areas. It was alleged that these activities were causing pollution to their agricultural lands.

The petitioners alleged in their application that they had filed several complaints to the Telangana State Pollution Control Board, district collectors of Rangareddy and Yadadri Bhuvanagiri, mining and revenue departments. But no action was taken to stop illegal mining and pollution. Locals also complained they were facing health hazards too due to the dust pollution caused by the stone quarries.

The NGT ordered the formation of a joint committee to examine the ground situation. It consisted of officials from the regional office of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change, State Pollution Control Board, State Mines Department, and State Level Impact Assessment Authority.

In April 2022, the joint committee submitted its report. It found that some of the companies operating in the area did not have the required permits. Individual reports submitted by the agencies in following months found some companies to be in violation of rules relating to prior environmental clearance.

In July, 2022, a public hearing was [held](https://tspcb.cgg.gov.in/publichearings/10.7 Ha. BNR Stone Crusher, Chinnaraviryala(V), Abdullapurmet(M), RRD- MIN.pdf) in Chinna Ravirala village in Ranga Reddy district of Telangana, in survey number 268 mining area. This was conducted to hear people's views about the proposed stone and metal quarrying project in the area.

Most people present in the hearing expressed their unhappiness with the pollution that was already being caused by stone crushing and mining activities in the area. Some people sought the compensation that was due to them in lieu of the land that was taken from for declaring the area as a mining zone be paid. They claimed they had been waiting for this since several decades.

In subsequent public hearings held in [November](https://tspcb.cgg.gov.in/publichearings/GMR Stone Crushers (10.076 Ha.) Chinnaraviryala (V), Abdullapurmet (M), RR Dist. - MIN.pdf) and [December](https://tspcb.cgg.gov.in/publichearings/Anantha Sai Industries Pvt. Ltd., (5.038 Ha.) Chinnaraviryala (V), Abdullapurmet (M), RR Dist. - MIN.pdf), 2022, residents of the area voiced opposition to the proposed along similar hearings. Referring to the pending NGT case on the matter, village residents also questioned the manner in which the public hearing was being held. Residents also pointed out the inaction of state measures for improving the public health that was being negatively impacted because of mining. However, there were others who mentioned they had no objections to it, but that the compensation due to them should be expedited.

Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for compensation

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban and Rural

Type of Land

Private

Type of Common Land

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

0.8

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2022

Page Number In Investment Document:

3

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Legal Data

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Legislations/Policies Involved

Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957
Section 4 [Prohibition on undertaking any mining operations except in accordance with the terms of the lease granted under the Act]; Section 4A(1) [Mining Lease can be terminated for preservation of the environment]
Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974
Section 25 [No person, without prior consent of State Pollution Control Board, to establish any industry that is likely to discharge sewage or trade effluent into water body]
Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1981
Paragraph 7(i)(III) Public consultation necessary before granting of environmental clearance; Paragraph 8(vi) [Regulatory Authority may reject the application for prior environmental clearance if they find deliberate concealment of information/ submission of false information]
Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006
Paragraph 7(i)(III) Public consultation necessary before granting of environmental clearance; Paragraph 8(vi) [Regulatory Authority may reject the application for prior environmental clearance if they find deliberate concealment of information/ submission of false information]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Violation of environmental laws

Legal Status:

In Court

Status of Case In Court

Pending

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

National Green Tribunal

Case Number

O.A. 09 of 2022 (SZ)

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

The Tribunal expressed displeasure with the functioning of both government agencies but granted them time to file detailed reports. The next date of hearing for the matter is slated to be March 23, 2023.

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

No items found.

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

No

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Additional Information

Nature of Protest

Complaints/petitions/letters/memorandums to officials

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Union Ministry of Environment; Directorate of Mines & Geology; Telangana State Pollution Control Board; State Level Impact Assessment Authority;

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Resources

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Images

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Video

In January 2022, a petition was filed in the National Green Tribunal (NGT) against the companies that were conducting mining and stone quarrying in Chinna Ravirala village and its surrounding areas. It was alleged that these activities were causing pollution to their agricultural lands.

The petitioners alleged in their application that they had filed several complaints to the Telangana State Pollution Control Board, district collectors of Rangareddy and Yadadri Bhuvanagiri, mining and revenue departments. But no action was taken to stop illegal mining and pollution. Locals also complained they were facing health hazards too due to the dust pollution caused by the stone quarries.

The NGT ordered the formation of a joint committee to examine the ground situation. It consisted of officials from the regional office of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change, State Pollution Control Board, State Mines Department, and State Level Impact Assessment Authority.

In April 2022, the joint committee submitted its report. It found that some of the companies operating in the area did not have the required permits. Individual reports submitted by the agencies in following months found some companies to be in violation of rules relating to prior environmental clearance.

In July, 2022, a public hearing was [held](https://tspcb.cgg.gov.in/publichearings/10.7 Ha. BNR Stone Crusher, Chinnaraviryala(V), Abdullapurmet(M), RRD- MIN.pdf) in Chinna Ravirala village in Ranga Reddy district of Telangana, in survey number 268 mining area. This was conducted to hear people's views about the proposed stone and metal quarrying project in the area.

Most people present in the hearing expressed their unhappiness with the pollution that was already being caused by stone crushing and mining activities in the area. Some people sought the compensation that was due to them in lieu of the land that was taken from for declaring the area as a mining zone be paid. They claimed they had been waiting for this since several decades.

In subsequent public hearings held in [November](https://tspcb.cgg.gov.in/publichearings/GMR Stone Crushers (10.076 Ha.) Chinnaraviryala (V), Abdullapurmet (M), RR Dist. - MIN.pdf) and [December](https://tspcb.cgg.gov.in/publichearings/Anantha Sai Industries Pvt. Ltd., (5.038 Ha.) Chinnaraviryala (V), Abdullapurmet (M), RR Dist. - MIN.pdf), 2022, residents of the area voiced opposition to the proposed along similar hearings. Referring to the pending NGT case on the matter, village residents also questioned the manner in which the public hearing was being held. Residents also pointed out the inaction of state measures for improving the public health that was being negatively impacted because of mining. However, there were others who mentioned they had no objections to it, but that the compensation due to them should be expedited.

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for compensation

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban and Rural

Type of Land

Private

Type of Common Land

Total investment involved (in Crores):

0.8

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2022

Page Number In Investment Document:

3

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Legislations/Policies Involved

Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957
Section 4 [Prohibition on undertaking any mining operations except in accordance with the terms of the lease granted under the Act]; Section 4A(1) [Mining Lease can be terminated for preservation of the environment]
Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974
Section 25 [No person, without prior consent of State Pollution Control Board, to establish any industry that is likely to discharge sewage or trade effluent into water body]
Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1981
Paragraph 7(i)(III) Public consultation necessary before granting of environmental clearance; Paragraph 8(vi) [Regulatory Authority may reject the application for prior environmental clearance if they find deliberate concealment of information/ submission of false information]
Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006
Paragraph 7(i)(III) Public consultation necessary before granting of environmental clearance; Paragraph 8(vi) [Regulatory Authority may reject the application for prior environmental clearance if they find deliberate concealment of information/ submission of false information]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Violation of environmental laws

Legal Status:

In Court

Status of Case In Court

Pending

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

National Green Tribunal

Case Number

O.A. 09 of 2022 (SZ)

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

The Tribunal expressed displeasure with the functioning of both government agencies but granted them time to file detailed reports. The next date of hearing for the matter is slated to be March 23, 2023.

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

No items found.

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

No

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Nature of Protest

Complaints/petitions/letters/memorandums to officials

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Union Ministry of Environment; Directorate of Mines & Geology; Telangana State Pollution Control Board; State Level Impact Assessment Authority;

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Documented By

Text Link

Reviewed By

Text Link

Updated By

Text Link

Edited By

Text LinkLand Conflict Watch

Other Land Conflicts in Telangana

cross
Not a member yet?
Sign up now