Tamil Nadu
Cheyyur
,
Paramankeni
,
Chengalpattu
Published : 12 July, 2014   |   Last updated - 24 Jun, 2024
In Chennai, road expansion project poses threat to Odiyur lagoon
Reported by
Viswanathan Sridhar
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Updated by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People Affected
2023
Year started
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2023
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Roads
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In January 2023, Saravanan a resident of Cheyyur village in Chengalpattu district of Tamil Nadu filed a petition in the National Green Tribunal against the expansion of the East Coast Road (ECR).

The expansion of the ECR had been planned to decongest traffic between Mahabalipuram and Pondicherry. The petitioners demanded for a realignment of a 1.7 Kilometre stretch of the road that adjoins the Odiyur lagoon. They claimed that the construction of a road over it would affect the ecology of the lagoon.

According to a survey carried out by Palluyir Trust, a civil society organisation based in Chennai, Odiyur lagoon is home to about 20,000 water birds and a wetland that was mapped under the National Wetland Inventory and Assessment. It is a declared important bird and biodiversity area (IBBA) under Criterion A4i and a crucial stopover site for migratory birds in Tamil Nadu. It is also considered a potential Ramsar site.

The project which is expected to cost Rs 2200 crore, might consume a part of the Odiyur Lagoon, which could disturb the ecology of the water body.

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), the implementing body, has submitted the realignment plan.

In March 2024, the same petitioner filed another case with NGT for dumping debris across the tidal channel that links the Odiyur lagoon and the sea. The debris were dumped to erect the pillars to build a bridge across the channel, which was blocking the free flow of the natural tidal water to the lagoon from the sea. The MoEF&CC had awarded CRZ clearance with specific condition to ensure the free flow of water.

In April, the NHAI [informed](https://www.dtnext.in/news/tamilnadu/odiyur-lagoon-will-be-cleared-by-january-2026-nhai-780257#:~:text=CHENNAI%3A The National Highway Authority,be completed by January 2026.) the NGT that the soil and debris dumped in the Odiyur lagoon will be removed within one month of the construction of a major bridge as part of ECR widening. This hearing was regarding the earlier petition against soil being dumped into the eco-sensitive lagoon and earlier order by Tribunal to reconsider the the alignment of project between Chennai and Puducherry near Odiyur. 

On 4 July 2024, the NGT ordered the NHAI to halt the construction of a cofferdam from one side of Odiyur lagoon in order to allow unrestricted flow of tidal water and adjourned the matter to August 2024.

On the visit to the Odiyur lagoon, LCW researcher found that the debris had been cleared on the northern half end of the Lagoon to ensure the free flow of the water. But the stones laid in the Odiyur wetland to mark the boundary of the road extent remained as per the original alignment. The road has been constructed without any new land acquisition on the opposite side of the wetland.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to proceed with the project only if the proposed expansion is through realignment

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

2025

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Water bodies

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Yes

Source/Reference

NGT Judgement

Total investment involved (in Crores):

2200

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2022

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Author
Reported by
Viswanathan Sridhar

Tamil Nadu

Kumar Sambhav is a social entrepreneur and award-winning journalist, leading innovative research in accountability investigations. He is the founder of Land Conflict Watch and is currently working as India Research Lead with Princeton University’s Digital Witness Lab.

Read More

Latest updates
Arunachal Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh

Hydroelectric projects on Subansiri river continue despite public outcry, disasters, and persistent floods

Gujarat
Gujarat

Farmers divided over Mandal-Becharaji Special Investment region in Gujarat

Gujarat
Gujarat

Farmers protest against GIDC in Gujarat, demand promised jobs, compensation

Goa
Goa

Proposed construction in Goa village blocks residents' access to agricultural fields, river

Assam
Assam

Violence erupts in Dhemaji amid ongoing Assam-Arunachal border dispute

Odisha
Odisha

Odisha's Dungripali village protests Aditya Birla solar power project

Assam
Assam

Illegal coal mining continues to thrive in Assam's Tinsukia

Assam
Assam

5 Cops Killed, 60 Civilians Injured in Firing between Assam, Mizoram Police

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

In Chennai, road expansion project poses threat to Odiyur lagoon

Reported by

Viswanathan Sridhar

Legal Review by

Anmol Gupta, Mukta Joshi

Edited by

Radhika Chatterjee

Updated by

Updated by

Raju KK

Published on

May 18, 2023

August 8, 2024

Edited on

August 7, 2024

May 18, 2023

Sector

Infrastructure

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Roads

Highways Expansion under Barathmala Project on the wetland

Starting Year

2023

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

ha

Households Affected by Conflict

People Affected by Conflict

State

Tamil Nadu

Sector

Infrastructure

People Affected by Conflict

Households Affected by Conflict

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

ha

Starting Year

2023

Location of Conflict

Paramankeni

Cheyyur

Chengalpattu

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Roads

Highways Expansion under Barathmala Project on the wetland

Land Conflict Summary

In January 2023, Saravanan a resident of Cheyyur village in Chengalpattu district of Tamil Nadu filed a petition in the National Green Tribunal against the expansion of the East Coast Road (ECR).

The expansion of the ECR had been planned to decongest traffic between Mahabalipuram and Pondicherry. The petitioners demanded for a realignment of a 1.7 Kilometre stretch of the road that adjoins the Odiyur lagoon. They claimed that the construction of a road over it would affect the ecology of the lagoon.

According to a survey carried out by Palluyir Trust, a civil society organisation based in Chennai, Odiyur lagoon is home to about 20,000 water birds and a wetland that was mapped under the National Wetland Inventory and Assessment. It is a declared important bird and biodiversity area (IBBA) under Criterion A4i and a crucial stopover site for migratory birds in Tamil Nadu. It is also considered a potential Ramsar site.

The project which is expected to cost Rs 2200 crore, might consume a part of the Odiyur Lagoon, which could disturb the ecology of the water body.

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), the implementing body, has submitted the realignment plan.

In March 2024, the same petitioner filed another case with NGT for dumping debris across the tidal channel that links the Odiyur lagoon and the sea. The debris were dumped to erect the pillars to build a bridge across the channel, which was blocking the free flow of the natural tidal water to the lagoon from the sea. The MoEF&CC had awarded CRZ clearance with specific condition to ensure the free flow of water.

In April, the NHAI [informed](https://www.dtnext.in/news/tamilnadu/odiyur-lagoon-will-be-cleared-by-january-2026-nhai-780257#:~:text=CHENNAI%3A The National Highway Authority,be completed by January 2026.) the NGT that the soil and debris dumped in the Odiyur lagoon will be removed within one month of the construction of a major bridge as part of ECR widening. This hearing was regarding the earlier petition against soil being dumped into the eco-sensitive lagoon and earlier order by Tribunal to reconsider the the alignment of project between Chennai and Puducherry near Odiyur. 

On 4 July 2024, the NGT ordered the NHAI to halt the construction of a cofferdam from one side of Odiyur lagoon in order to allow unrestricted flow of tidal water and adjourned the matter to August 2024.

On the visit to the Odiyur lagoon, LCW researcher found that the debris had been cleared on the northern half end of the Lagoon to ensure the free flow of the water. But the stones laid in the Odiyur wetland to mark the boundary of the road extent remained as per the original alignment. The road has been constructed without any new land acquisition on the opposite side of the wetland.

Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to proceed with the project only if the proposed expansion is through realignment

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Type of Common Land

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

2025

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Water bodies

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Yes

Source/Reference

NGT Judgement

Total investment involved (in Crores):

2200

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2022

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Legal Data

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Legislations/Policies Involved

Wetlands (Conservation and Management) Rules, 2017
Rule 4 [Restriction of activities on wetlands to include any construction of permanent nature]
Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 2011
Section 3: Prohibited activities within CRZ,- The following are declared as prohibited activities within the CRZ, - (iv) Land reclamation, bunding or disturbing the natural course of seawater except those, \- (a) required for setting up, construction or modernisation or expansion of foreshore facilities like ports, harbours, jetties, wharves, quays, slipways, bridges, sealink, road on stilts, and such as meant for defence and security purpose and for other facilities that are essential for activities permissible under the notification
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

No

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Violation of environmental laws

Lack of legal protection over land rights

Legal Status:

In Court

Status of Case In Court

Pending

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

No

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

National Green Tribunal (Southern Zone)

Case Number

OA No:05/2023(SZ), OA No:106/2024 (SZ)

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

An Original Application was filed before the Southern Zone of the National Green Tribunal in January 2023. On January 17, 2023, the NGT issued an interim stay on any construction activities on the western side of the existing road along the Odiyur Lagoon. NHAI was asked by the tribunal to reconsider the realignment of the disputed stretch of 1.7 kms in February 2023. In April, 2023, NHAI submitted a status report where it stated that various alternatives were being considered. On the final hearing on July 24, 2023, the NHAI accepted to change the alignment of the road from the proposed intertidal space to the other side of the existing road without impacting the wetland. Another Original Application was filed before the Southern Zone of the National Green Tribunal in March 2024. July 3, 2024, the NGT has ordered to remove cofferdam and construction in the northern side untill the construction work is completed in the southern side to ensure continuous tidal flow in Odiyur lagoon.

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

No items found.

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Additional Information

Nature of Protest

Objections as part of official procedures

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

National Highways Authority of India, Tamil Nadu Coastal Zone Management Authority

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

SPL infrastructure Pvt Ltd

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Objections as part of official procedures

Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Resources

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Images

1.7 KM stretch of the proposed Expansion of the existing ECR adjoining Odiyur Lagoon (Created using Google Earth)

Image Credit:  

Viswanathan Sridhar

Debris being removed from Northern end of the lagoon ensuring free flow of natural tidal water

Image Credit:  

Raju KK

Video

National Highway Authority of India

Other Land Conflicts in Tamil Nadu

cross
    Not a member yet?
    Sign up now