The Green Pharma City project, planned within 40 kilometres of Hyderabad, involved the acquisition of 19,333 acres of land in Ranga Reddy district. The project is expected to create 5.6 lakh direct and indirect job opportunities, with an estimated investment of Rs 16,784 crore. Apart from drug manufacturing companies, there is a proposal to set up a pharma university as part of the project, raising concerns that farmers from 20 villages were to lose their landholdings due to the project development.
The Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation started land acquisition in 2016. The primary contention of the farmers was that they were being compensated at rates much lower than the prevailing market rate. While the cost per acre for Yacharam tehsil was Rs 7.5 lakh, the market price was Rs 22.5 lakh. The market price went up to more than Rs 80 lakh per acre in Kandukur tehsil. Moreover, violating the Supreme Court's judgement in the Mekala Pandu case, the government had also been compensating assigned lands and _patta _lands at different rates.
The unavailability of information had impaired the process of challenging environmental clearances (EC) within 90 days. There had been multiple inadequacies reported in the compensation process, as 18-year-olds were paid as adults, who are legally not eligible for compensation directly.
In response to a petition by eight farmers cultivating government-assigned lands from Kurmidda village, the Telangana High Court stayed the land acquisition process in September 2016.
In May 2018, an expert appraisal committee of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change recommended granting EC to the project, on the condition that land is acquired with suitable compensation and the consent of land owners. Local activists say the authorities are, however, going ahead with land acquisition in violation of court orders by resorting to threats and spreading misinformation.
Some farmers who had earlier surrendered their lands began tilling them again in 2019, contending that the project had not made any progress and that the compensation had been highly inadequate.
In October 2020, when a meeting regarding the Pharma City project was held by officials, villagers flung chairs and raised slogans, enraged by the opacity of the process and their exclusion from it. This led to the police intervening and detaining them.
In February 2021, hundreds of farmers from Yacharam and Kadtal tehsils participated in a protest march opposing the project. One of the local organisations, Pharma City Vyatireka Porata Committee, demanded that the government stop the forceful acquisition of lands.
On 5 August 2023, the Telangana High Court quashed the notices regarding the acquisition of the land due to procedural irregularities found in the matter. Later in 2023, farmers returned to court with fresh petitions, alleging that officials were still interfering with their lands despite the High Court’s directions to halt and restart acquisition.
In August 2024, a single judge set aside a 2017 preliminary notification and related declarations for 250 acres, ordering the state to restart the process from the objections stage and to pay compensation based on current market value.
Despite these orders, farmers allege that officials continued to survey and fence lands and even removed their names from the Dharani land portal, actions later acknowledged in court as illegal. According to a report by The Federal, the High Court struck down 12 acquisition‑related declarations and issued stays, yet many protesting farmers remain excluded from official records, leading them to describe Pharma City as a “nightmare” and a symbol of betrayal and displacement.
In September 2024, the state appealed the single-judge order; a division bench issued notices to 72 farmers and the government, while Revenue Principal Secretary Navin Mittal insisted in a counter‑affidavit that Pharma City was not scrapped and that the Government order is still valid. Mittal clarified that no orders or decisions have been made to revoke GO 31 and that the government is actively implementing the project.
The Advocate‑General similarly assured the court that land would be used for green pharma purposes and that farmers would receive compensation and also 'Rythu Bandhu' scheme benefits. In 2025, the Congress government announced the Bharat Future City Development Authority (BFCDA) over the same region, envisioning a multi‑sector hub and assigning some of the already acquired Pharma City land to a skill university and sports hub.
Assigning the land for another project has reignited farmers’ demands for the return of their land if the Pharma City project does not move forward. This is in addition to the approval required from the High Court for the allocation.
Demand/Contention of the Affected Community
Demand for more compensation than promised
Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community
Region Classification
Rural
Type of Land
Common and Private
Forest and Non-Forest, Non-Forest (Grazing Land), Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)
What was the action taken by the police?
How many people did the police detain or arrest?
What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?
Did the person face any violence while in police custody?
If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?
If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?
Legislation under which the accused was charged
Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?
In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?
Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?
Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)
Status of Project
Project underway despite protests
Original Project Deadline
2025
Whether the Project has been Delayed
No
Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users
Agricultural land
Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict
Source/Reference
Total investment involved (in Crores):
₹
16784
Type of investment:
Cost of Project
Year of Estimation
2016
Has the Conflict Ended?
No
When did it end?
Why did the conflict end?
Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict
Land Acquisition Laws, Environmental Law, Environmental Law
Legislations/Policies Involved
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute
Yes
What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?
What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?
Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:
Incorrect estimation of compensation
Legal Status:
In Court
Status of Case In Court
Whether any adjudicatory body was approached
Yes
Name of the adjudicatory body
Telangana High Court
Name(s) of the Court(s)
High Court for the State of Telangana
Case Number
WRIT PETITION NOs.4787 OF 2019, 7440, 9306 AND 11272 OF 2020, 24160 OF 2021 AND 30754 OF 2022
Main Reasoning/Decision of court
Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:
Arrest/detention/imprisonment
Whether criminal law was used against protestors:
Reported Details of the Violation:
Assigned lands were taken over through threats; protesters were arrested for staging a road block
Date of Violation
October 16, 2020
Location of Violation
Yacharam tehsil
Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:
Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (TSIIC), Revenue Department, Roads & Buildings Department
PSUs Involved in the Conflict:
Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?
No
Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached
Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:
Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?
No
Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:
Affected villagers
What was the action taken by the police?
How many people did the police detain or arrest?
What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?
Did the person face any violence while in police custody?
If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?
If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?
Legislation under which the accused was charged
Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?
In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?
Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?
Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?









