The Gouravelli reservoir, which was proposed under the Jalayagnam project in 2007, is being built in Husnabad mandal in Karimnagar district. Initially proposed at a capacity of 1.4 tmcft (thousand million cubic feet) by late Chief Minister Y S Rajasekhar Reddy, the capacity of the reservoir was increased to 8.23 tmcft by the Telangana Rashtra Samithi, the new ruling party. The move requires an additional 1,967.18 acres of land, of which 960 acres are private land, in addition to that already acquired for the old plan.
While land acquisition is yet to be complete, the compensation process has not been up to speed with it. In fact, the compensation process for the land acquired for the old plan is still far from complete. The main contention of the affected community is two-fold. First, the government has substantially delayed the compensation process and has left the affected farmers high and dry. Second, the compensation prices being offered are much below the market price. On this account, they demand that either the compensation package should be increased to Rs 15-17 lakh per acre or the affected households should be given houses within a two kilometre radius of Husnabad with the remaining amount paid as per prevailing market rates.
The farmers have repeatedly voiced their grievance against the lack of compensation. In August 2015, unhappy with the rehabilitation and resettlement package, they tried to approach the chief minister on his visit to Gudatipalli village but could not meet him. In December 2017, villagers were 536 days into observing a relay fast demanding implementation and adherence to the Land Acquisition Act, 2013, afraid of losing land for a second time. In the same month, a _gram sabha _(Village Assembly) was held, but it was concluded abruptly without sufficiently involving the villagers.
The construction work was launched in January 2018 by Irrigation Minister Harish Rao and was followed by the Telangana high court ordering the state government in June 2018 to not displace families before providing them with resettlement and rehabilitation packages. But the order was not followed. In February 2020, the farmers protested again, blocking JCBs and lorries working on site and demanding to be compensated at least before the project was completed.
In August 2020, farmers received notices from the government stating that they have to accept Rs 8 lakh as compensation, which is less than half the market price. This forced them to file a writ petition before the high court demanding justice.
According to the Telangana High Court, those in Gouravelli village, Husnabad mandal, Karimnagar district who qualify for rehabilitation as a result of the Gouravelli Reservoir project can petition to the authorities for their advantages. Mamidi Ramesh Reddy and others filed a case alleging that their land was acquired under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act without any compensation. The government produced an affidavit demonstrating that 927 households, including the petitioners, received compensation in the form of a Rs 8 lakh one-time settlement and the rehabilitation package. The government is willing to compensate the ten relocated households that are still in existence.
On 13 June 2022, ahead of Minister Harish Rao's scheduled trial run for the Gouravelli Reservoir pump sets, the local police entered Gudatipally village and arrested protest leaders such as Shankar Reddy. At least three persons, including women, were injured during an early-morning raid. A day later, on 14 June, police resorted to baton charging the villagers after a protest at the camp office of local MLA Sathish Babu.
On 15 June 2022, Finance Minister Harish Rao assured villagers affected by the Gauravelli Reservoir project that they would not face forced eviction. He offered 200 square yards of land as compensation and said any increase in monetary compensation would require court approval. While some farmers have received compensation rates up to Rs 15–17 lakh per acre following protests and legal action, disputes persist over standard Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R) benefits and unresolved claims, particularly for elderly and displaced residents.
Farmers in Gudatipally who requested just compensation for their property under the Land Acquisition Act of 2013 in relation to the Gouravelli reservoir received notices from the Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R) authority in September 2023. About 24 farmers, who possess 54 acres, have not agreed to the acquisition of land, despite the fact that the majority of farmers in the submerging Gudatipally hamlet have. The authorities requested farmers to provide information about their land. A farmer pointed out that under the same project, a farmer in the neighbouring Karimnagar district received Rs 33 lakh as compensation for the loss of an open well during tunnel excavation, whereas in Siddipet district, the farmers were offered only Rs 4 lakh. Farmers vowed to bring the matter to the attention of the R&R authority.
Transport Minister Ponnam Prabhhakar on 21 June 2024 directed revenue officers to survey and mark the land purchased for distributary canals under the Gouravelli reservoir. In Akkannapet, Husnabad, and Koheda mandals, the Irrigation Department needs 132, 235, and 304 acres, respectively. The minister added that 95 percent of the Gouravelli reservoir's work has already been finished. He asked the officials to get National Green Tribunal (NGT) permission to complete the remaning 5 percent work.
Demand/Contention of the Affected Community
Demand for more compensation than promised
Demand for rehabilitation
Demand for promised compensation
Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community
Region Classification
Rural
Type of Land
Common and Private
Non-Forest (Grazing Land), Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)
What was the action taken by the police?
Arrest
How many people did the police detain or arrest?
3
What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?
Released from arrest
Did the person face any violence while in police custody?
No
If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?
Yes, they were produced within 24 hours
If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?
Legislation under which the accused was charged
Criminal Procedure Code
Section 107
Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?
In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?
Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?
Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)
Status of Project
Project underway despite protests
Original Project Deadline
2008
Whether the Project has been Delayed
Yes
Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users
Agricultural land
Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict
Source/Reference
Total investment involved (in Crores):
₹
1200
Type of investment:
Investment Expected
Year of Estimation
2007
Has the Conflict Ended?
When did it end?
Why did the conflict end?
Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict
Land Acquisition Laws, Land Acquisition Laws
Legislations/Policies Involved
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute
What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?
What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?
Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:
Non-rehabilitation of displaced people
Delay in compensation
Incorrect estimation of compensation
Non-implementation/violation of LARR Act
Legal Status:
In Court
Status of Case In Court
Disposed
Whether any adjudicatory body was approached
Name of the adjudicatory body
Name(s) of the Court(s)
High Court for the State of Telengana
Case Number
Main Reasoning/Decision of court
Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:
Physical attack
Whether criminal law was used against protestors:
Yes
Reported Details of the Violation:
In June 2022, protests related to the Gouravelli reservoir project took place mainly in Gudatipally village, Akkannapet mandal, Siddipet district, Telangana. Villagers were protesting against land acquisition and demanding fair compensation and resettlement. On June 13, police raided Gudatipally early in the morning, detaining and injuring several residents. Clashes also occurred later at the local MLA’s camp office and police station in Husnabad during protests. The situation escalated with violence involving ruling party workers, protesters, and police, leading to arrests and injuries on both sides.
Date of Violation
June 12, 2022
Location of Violation
Gudatipally village in Akkannapet mandal, Siddipet district, Telangana.
Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:
Irrigation & CAD Department, Revenue Department
PSUs Involved in the Conflict:
Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?
No
Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached
Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:
Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?
No
Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:
Farmers
What was the action taken by the police?
Arrest
How many people did the police detain or arrest?
3
What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?
Released from arrest
Did the person face any violence while in police custody?
No
If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?
Yes, they were produced within 24 hours
If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?
Legislation under which the accused was charged
Criminal Procedure Code
Section 107
Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?
In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?
Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?
Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?








