Himachal Pradesh
Sundarnagar, Nachan, Balh valley
,
Nagchala
,
Mandi
Published :
Jan 2020
|
Updated :
August 20, 2024
Farmers in Himachal Pradesh Oppose Takeover of Fertile Land for Mandi Airport
Reported by
Meenakshi Kapoor
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
2000
Households affected
9600
People affected
2018
Year started
292
Land area affected
2000
Households affected
9600
People Affected
2018
Year started
292
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Airport
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Airport
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In May 2018, a team of the Airports Authority of India (AAI) conducted a pre-feasibility survey in the Mandi district to select a suitable site for a new international airport in Himachal Pradesh. In September, AAI gave clearance to a location in Balh valley for the project. According to a news report, the cost of acquisition was estimated at over Rs 2,000 crore for 3,500 bighas of land across eight villages, of which 3,040 bighas is private land while 460 bighas is government-owned.  

However, the affected farmers and landowners immediately raised objections on the takeover of their lands. They collected under the banner of Balh Bachao Kisan Sangharsh Samiti (BBKSS) to request the state to acquire barren land nearby instead of their fertile lands. They have highlighted that agriculture is the dominant source of livelihood in the region.

Meanwhile, the Chief Minister committed to pursuing the project as it would give a boost to tourism and development activities in the state. 

According to the chairperson of BBKSS, 2,000 families would lose their agricultural land and be displaced in the process. He claims that many of them are already affected by the previous highway development project. On October 01, 2018, the affected-persons organised a protest outside the district headquarters in Mandi and submitted a memorandum to the Chief Minister through the Sub-Divisional Magistrate. 

In a news report, the divisional president of BKSS highlighted that the loss of land would severely affect the multi-cropping and cash crop-based agricultural practices, groundwater availability, and the livelihood of the migrant workers in the region. The protestors have also claimed that the acquisition would violate provisions under LARR 2013.

In December 2018, the protestors staged a sit-in outside the SDM’s office. They submitted a memorandum to the Prime Minister and the Chief Minister of the state. However, in October 2019, the project received in-principle approval from the AAI and the Ministry of Civil Aviation. 

The BBKSS has demanded that the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) should first complete the process of providing compensation to the outsees of the Kiratpur-Nerchowk four-laning project at four times the market value of the land and implement the rehabilitation and resettlement policy and subsequently, attempt to acquire land for the Mandi airport. In November 2019, the organisation submitted another memorandum to the Chief Minister. 

Since then the protests have continued. In August 2020, the residents of Balh valley formed human chains at several locations in protest.

According to Samiti's president, Joginder Walia, at least 75 per cent of the population in six out of eight villages consist of the households of Dalits, Other Backward Castes and Muslim communities. He stated that these households would be worst affected by the state-led displacement. Also deputy head of BBKSS, Paras Ram, has claimed that the circle rates decided would not compensate the farmers for their actual earnings from cultivation.

As per a news report, in November 2020, Samiti released a press statement condemning the state government’s attempts to expedite the project without addressing the affected people’s grievances and their socio-environmental implications. They also recommended an alternative location for the project, which is primarily government-owned. Later that month, a SSBKK delegation took out a rally and submitted their demands in the district headquarters. They also threatened to intensify protests and take direct action if the state government did not respond to the concerns.

In February 2021, Walia claimed that the state government continued to ignore the interests of the people affected. SKSS also held public meetings in the affected villages to discuss the adverse impact of the project on arable land, livelihood sustainability and the land’s proneness to flooding. 

On March 01, 2021, farmers collected to march in protest to SDM’s office and submitted another memorandum for the Chief Minister demanding relocation of the airport. In April, the workers again protested on farms by holding banners.

The social impact report was submitted in February 2023, which noted the demand of the affected villagers that the airport be shifted to Jahu in Hamirpur. In April 2023, newspapers reported may be shifted by about 50 km to Hamirpur. As of February 2024, the demand had not been finalised.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for compensation

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project stalled due to protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence, Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Yes

Source/Reference

https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/himachal/mandi-may-lose-airport-project-to-hamirpur-496779

Total investment involved (in Crores):

2000

Type of investment:

Investment Expected

Year of Estimation

2020

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Airports Authority of India

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Airports Authority of India

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

N/A

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Balh Bachao Kisan Sangharsh Samiti

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Meenakshi Kapoor

Meenakshi is an independent researcher currently based in Himachal Pradesh. She has a Master's in Environmental Management from the Forest Research Institute. She has formerly worked with the Centre for Policy Research, Namati and Kalpavriksh on issues of environmental compliance and regulation. Her interest in the politics of regulatory action gave her the opportunity to study institutions such as the Coastal Zone Management Authorities and the ESA Monitoring Committees. She has also researched on natural resource governance and large-scale land-use change in Indonesia and Myanmar and is experienced in extensive research, writing and advocacy on the Coastal Regulation Zone law of India. Besides researching and reporting from the hills, she enjoys farming, cooking her harvest, tending to her plants and pets, reading in the sun and counting the number of hues at sunset.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for compensation

Opposition against environmental degradation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project stalled due to protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence, Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Yes

Source/Reference

https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/himachal/mandi-may-lose-airport-project-to-hamirpur-496779

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us