Slum Dwellers in Gujarat Displaced by Sabarmati Riverfront Await Rehabilitation

Reported by

Aditi Patil

Legal Data by

Edited by

Updated by

Published on

June 1, 2018

June 1, 2018

Updated on

June 1, 2018

Location of Conflict

Ahmedabad

Ahmedabad

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Urban Development (Other than Smart Cities)

(

)

People Affected by Conflict

10500

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

30

ha

Starting Year

2006

State

Gujarat

Sector

Infrastructure

The Sabarmati River Front Development project was envisaged in 1997 when the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) established a special purpose vehicle, the Sabarmati River Front Development Corporation Limited (SRFDCL), to develop the city's riverfront. Its 1998 proposal not only sought to ambitiously redevelop the riverfront but also brought the relocation and rehabilitation of the riverfront urban poor within the scope of the project. It recommended that six affected slum families be resettled on the riverfront itself, stating that displacing them more than 23 kilometres from their present site would affect their livelihoods negatively. A public interest litigation (PIL) was filed in the Gujarat high court in April 2005, articulating the rights of the slum dwellers. The court ruling gave a stay order, asking the government authorities to spell out their plans for resettlement and rehabilitation (R&R) and to not evict any family until further orders by the court. However, the rights articulated in the PIL were entirely absent in the rulings. For the next three years, the AMC continued with the construction of the riverfront project without finalising the R&R plan. Despite the stay order, the AMC tried to evict some families from different riverfront slums. The corporation finally submitted its R&R policy to the high court in mid2008. After three phases of resettlement in 200910, the AMC carried out demolitions in the riverfront slums in May 2011. On not having any housing facility or an alternative interim rehabilitation, over 1,000 families, including children and elderly people, were forced to live under the sweltering sun next to their demolished houses. Currently, the displaced people are facing increased unemployment and poverty. The resettlement had profound impact on their livelihood due to the distance. The average distance of the resettlement site from the central city area is seven kilometres. By 2017, at least 25 persons had committed suicide driven by depression because of loss of livelihood. Moreover, slum dwellers who were promised rehabilitation in new flats but were not given any were asked to reside on the grounds of Ganesh Nagar. They were given temporary plots to build a wooden shack with tarp but promised that new homes would be built. There has been no proper census of the hutments in the area and the plan grossly understates the number of affected people at least by 10,000 units, according to Deepak Babaria from Ahmedabad, who has worked closely with the riverfront dwellers' association for rehabilitation. In March 2021, tenders for an extension of the riverfront were floated. The new stretch is set to include an international park, a ferry service and a water taxi, among others. With all the slum hutments already cleared out from the area, the project will not involve rehabilitation and relocation at all and stands to proceed without any roadblocks, despite numerous slum dwellers still waiting to be rehabilitated.

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand for rehabilitation

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Common

Type of Common Land

Non-Forest (Grazing Land), Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

Total investment involved (in Crores):

1796.3

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Other

Legislations/Policies Involved

Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949
Section 1 [Provisions of the Act apply to the city of Ahmedabad]; Section 284E [Power to declare an area a redevelopment area; Commissioner must account for persons to be disposed]
Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976
Section 40(3)(j) [Reservation of 10 per cent land in town planning schemes for economically weaker classes of people, slum dwellers relocated here]
Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission dated December 3, 2005
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Non-rehabilitation of displaced people

Forced evictions/dispossession of land

Lack of legal protection over land rights

Legal Status:

In Court

Status of Case In Court

Disposed

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

High Court of Gujarat

Case Number

SCA No. 6280/2005, WP (PIL) No. 18/2012

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

Self-immolation/suicide

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

Reported Details of the Violation:

By 2017, at least 25 persons had committed suicide driven by depression because of loss of livelihood.

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Nature of Protest

Complaints/petitions/letters/memorandums to officials

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Sabarmati River Front Development Corporation Limited

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

HCP Design, Planning and Management Private Limited, Jhaveri Associates, Advance Engineering Consultants

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Sabarmati Nagrik Adhikar Manch, Rahethan Adhikar Manch, St. Xavier's Social Service Society

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Documented By

Text Link

Reviewed By

Text Link

Updated By

Text Link

Edited By

Text LinkLand Conflict Watch
X

Support our work

Your contribution ensures continuity of this crucial project.

As a member, you will get exclusive access to special reports, policy papers and research projects undertaken by Land Conflict Watch and behind-the-scenes interactions with the writers and researchers about their work.
Join Now