JOIN THE LCW
COMMUNITY

Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, quarterly analytics report, curated expert talks, merchandise and much more. Support our work!

Sign up today

Communities revive campaign against oil refinery in Ratnagiri district, Maharashtra

Reported by

Saumya Srivastava

Legal Review by

Anmol Gupta, Mukta Joshi

Edited by

Radhika Chatterjee

Updated by

Maitreya Ghorpade

Published on

February 22, 2023

May 31, 2023

Edited on

May 26, 2023

February 22, 2023

State

Maharashtra

Sector

Industry

People Affected by Conflict

Households Affected by Conflict

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

5261

ha

Starting Year

2018

Location of Conflict

Babulwadi

Nanar, Sagwe, Taral, Karsinghewadi, Vadapalle, Villye, Dattawadi, Padekarwadi, Katradevi, Karvine, Chowke, Upade, Padwe, Sakhar, Gothiware, Girye and Rameshwar

Ratnagiri

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Petroleum and Gas

Land Conflict Summary

In August 2022, residents of Nanar and Barsu - Solgaon area in the state of Maharashtra decided to renew their campaign against the Ratnagiri Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited (RRPCL). This area is in Ratnagiri district, which lies in India's western coastal region. This part is also known as the Konkan coast.

RRPCL is a joint venture of Saudi Aramco, Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC), Indian Oil Corporation, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, and Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited. In 2017, when the project was first proposed, it was planned in Babulwadi village in Ratnagiri district. The project is likely to displace farmers and fisherfolk from seventeen villages, out of which fifteen are in Ratnagiri district and two in neighbouring Sindhudurg district along the western coast. Environmental activists fear that the project would harm the fragile biodiversity of the coastal areas in the Konkan region.

In 2018, around 15,000 residents of the affected villages had gathered to protest at Rajiv Gandhi Maidan in Rajapur tehsil in Ratnagiri district. Owing to the stiff resistance offered by community members, the then government was forced to agree to halt the project. Later the project site was shifted to a new location in Barsu-Solgaon but within the same district.

In 2022, the government of Maharashtra began talks for reviving the project. This is being opposed by community members living in the affected villages. The new site for the refinery in Barsu village is also home to ancient rock carvings, known technically as petroglyphs. Archaeologists have expressed concerns that locating the refinery in the village will have damage the petrogylphs. If implemented, this oil refinery will have a capacity to process 60 million metric tonnes of crude oil annually. RRPCL expects to provide employment to 1,50,000 people during the construction of the project and direct employment to 20,000 people upon completion, in addition to generating lakhs of indirect jobs.

Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand to cancel the project

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against degradation of historical sites

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Type of Common Land

Non-Forest (Grazing Land), Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

Arrest

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

150

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Out on bail

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

No

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

No

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

They were produced before a magistrate, but there was a delay beyond 24 hours

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Accused Mangesh Chavan over telephonic conversation with LCW stated that the time of the his arrest (along with co-accused Satyajeet Chavan) was reported by the Police as 10 PM, despite the fact that that both of them were picked up at around 11:15 AM. They were produced before a Magistrate the day after, sometime in the evening, therefore being beyond the period of 24 hours since arrest.

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Indian Penal Code, 1860

143, 147, 149, 341, 109, 186, 188

Maharashtra Police Act, 1951

37(1), 37(3), 135

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

Neither were they informed, nor did they have access

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Yes

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Bail was granted on the condition that the accused were not to leave the jurisdiction of Ratnagiri. Quantum of Bail was Rs. 5000, in addition to signing of Personal Bond of Rs. 15000.

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

“We were intercepted on our way to the neighbouring village of Karla by two police officials in plain clothes. The police must be tracking Satyajeet through his phone, who had come to my place in Ratnagiri from Mumbai. The police didn’t take us to the police station. Instead they took us to a dog squad unit located at MIDC industrial area, in a private car. We were interrogated for six hours and then taken to the city police station. The police then told us that they had received orders for our preventive arrest,” alleged Mangesh Chavhan, as per News report -

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Mangesh Chavan - Accused (9423876066) Adv Chandrashekar Abhyankar - Advocate for Accused (8149696693)

Status of Project

Project stalled due to protests

Original Project Deadline

2022

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Water bodies, Agricultural land, Residential area, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Yes

Source/Reference

<https://thewire.in/rights/thousands-in-maharashtra-are-opposing-what-could-be-globes-largest-oil-refinery>

Total investment involved (in Crores):

270000

Type of investment:

Investment Expected

Year of Estimation

2018

Page Number In Investment Document:

1

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Legal Data

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Legislations/Policies Involved

Maharashtra Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1960
Section 3 [All ancient and historical monuments in Maharashtra shall be considered protected monuments for the purpose of this Act] Section 17 [State Government may prohibit or restrict construction in an area which has a protected monument]
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013
Section 4(1) [If the government intends to acquire land, it must carry out a Social Impact Assessment study and publish a notification of the SIA study], Section 5 [Public hearing shall be conducted at the affected area to hear affected parties, which shall be recorded in the SIA Report]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Non-consultation with stakeholders

Legal Status:

Out of Court

Status of Case In Court

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

No

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Case Number

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

No items found.

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

Yes

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Additional Information

Nature of Protest

Protests/marches

Campaigns (grassroots organisations/press releases/media)

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Ratnagiri Refinery & Petrochemicals Limited, Saudi Aramco, Abu Dhabi National Oil Company

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Konkan Refinery Virodhi Sangharsh Samiti, Barsu-Solgaon Panchkroshi

Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

Arrest

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

150

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Out on bail

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

No

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

They were produced before a magistrate, but there was a delay beyond 24 hours

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Accused Mangesh Chavan over telephonic conversation with LCW stated that the time of the his arrest (along with co-accused Satyajeet Chavan) was reported by the Police as 10 PM, despite the fact that that both of them were picked up at around 11:15 AM. They were produced before a Magistrate the day after, sometime in the evening, therefore being beyond the period of 24 hours since arrest.

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Indian Penal Code, 1860

143, 147, 149, 341, 109, 186, 188

Maharashtra Police Act, 1951

37(1), 37(3), 135

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

Neither were they informed, nor did they have access

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Yes

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Bail was granted on the condition that the accused were not to leave the jurisdiction of Ratnagiri. Quantum of Bail was Rs. 5000, in addition to signing of Personal Bond of Rs. 15000.

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

“We were intercepted on our way to the neighbouring village of Karla by two police officials in plain clothes. The police must be tracking Satyajeet through his phone, who had come to my place in Ratnagiri from Mumbai. The police didn’t take us to the police station. Instead they took us to a dog squad unit located at MIDC industrial area, in a private car. We were interrogated for six hours and then taken to the city police station. The police then told us that they had received orders for our preventive arrest,” alleged Mangesh Chavhan, as per News report -

Resources

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Images

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Video

In August 2022, residents of Nanar and Barsu - Solgaon area in the state of Maharashtra decided to renew their campaign against the Ratnagiri Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited (RRPCL). This area is in Ratnagiri district, which lies in India's western coastal region. This part is also known as the Konkan coast.

RRPCL is a joint venture of Saudi Aramco, Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC), Indian Oil Corporation, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, and Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited. In 2017, when the project was first proposed, it was planned in Babulwadi village in Ratnagiri district. The project is likely to displace farmers and fisherfolk from seventeen villages, out of which fifteen are in Ratnagiri district and two in neighbouring Sindhudurg district along the western coast. Environmental activists fear that the project would harm the fragile biodiversity of the coastal areas in the Konkan region.

In 2018, around 15,000 residents of the affected villages had gathered to protest at Rajiv Gandhi Maidan in Rajapur tehsil in Ratnagiri district. Owing to the stiff resistance offered by community members, the then government was forced to agree to halt the project. Later the project site was shifted to a new location in Barsu-Solgaon but within the same district.

In 2022, the government of Maharashtra began talks for reviving the project. This is being opposed by community members living in the affected villages. The new site for the refinery in Barsu village is also home to ancient rock carvings, known technically as petroglyphs. Archaeologists have expressed concerns that locating the refinery in the village will have damage the petrogylphs. If implemented, this oil refinery will have a capacity to process 60 million metric tonnes of crude oil annually. RRPCL expects to provide employment to 1,50,000 people during the construction of the project and direct employment to 20,000 people upon completion, in addition to generating lakhs of indirect jobs.

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand to cancel the project

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against degradation of historical sites

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Type of Common Land

Non-Forest (Grazing Land), Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

Total investment involved (in Crores):

270000

Type of investment:

Investment Expected

Year of Estimation

2018

Page Number In Investment Document:

1

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Legislations/Policies Involved

Maharashtra Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1960
Section 3 [All ancient and historical monuments in Maharashtra shall be considered protected monuments for the purpose of this Act] Section 17 [State Government may prohibit or restrict construction in an area which has a protected monument]
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013
Section 4(1) [If the government intends to acquire land, it must carry out a Social Impact Assessment study and publish a notification of the SIA study], Section 5 [Public hearing shall be conducted at the affected area to hear affected parties, which shall be recorded in the SIA Report]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Non-consultation with stakeholders

Legal Status:

Out of Court

Status of Case In Court

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

No

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Case Number

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

No items found.

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

Yes

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Nature of Protest

Protests/marches

Campaigns (grassroots organisations/press releases/media)

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Ratnagiri Refinery & Petrochemicals Limited, Saudi Aramco, Abu Dhabi National Oil Company

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Konkan Refinery Virodhi Sangharsh Samiti, Barsu-Solgaon Panchkroshi

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Documented By

Text Link

Reviewed By

Text Link

Updated By

Text Link

Edited By

Text LinkLand Conflict Watch

Other Land Conflicts in Maharashtra

cross
Not a member yet?
Sign up now