Bhils in MP's Manawar against UltraTech Cement Factory, Demand Jobs

Reported by

Satyendra Singh NarwariaLand Conflict Watch

Last updated on

April 27, 2021

Location of Conflict


Temarni, Sondul and Golpura


This is A Schedule Five District

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Other Kind of Industry

Cement factory



People Affected by Conflict

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)



Starting Year



Madhya Pradesh



In 2010, the Birla Group and the Government of Madhya Pradesh signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), allowing UltraTech Cement Limited to set up a factory in Manawar tehsil in Dhar district. Since its inception in 2018, the project has been strongly challenged by the local Bhil population living in 27 villages that will be affected by the project. These villages occupy the command area of the Mann Dam of the Narmada Valley Development Authority. The Bhils fear that their irrigated land will be acquired for the project and that dam waters will be diverted for the factory. In 2018, the state government relocated the villagers and acquired their land. Jai Adivasi Yuva Shakti National Convener Hiralal Alawa said that the Bhils were paid meagre compensation for their land, which was below the market rate. Activists like Prashant Patidar questioned the need for acquisition when land acquired for the Dhar Cement factory was lying vacant. Since Manawar is a Schedule V area, the consent of the gram sabha (Village Assembly) is required according to the Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996. Meera from the Narmada Bachao Andolan said that the government chose to go ahead with the project despite rejection by the gram sabha. She also said that the MoU's validity had expired in 2013. The protesters have also alleged the use of the 1984 Land Acquisition Act to acquire land. In March 2018, approximately 10,000 villagers from neighbouring districts assembled in Sodul village in Manawar demanding the return of land and employment in the cement factory. They said that up to 75 per cent of jobs should be reserved for the local people. In May 2019, according to a local newspaper, the state had promised 50 per cent employment in the factory, as per the newly amended state industrial policy. But in an earlier information given by the state revenue minister in the Legislative Assembly in January 2019, only seven persons were employed in the Ultra Tech cement plant three years after the plant was set up.
In July 2019, District Panchayat President Yogendra Singh Muvell submitted a memorandum to the subdivisional magistrate of Dhar district to provide information on whether projectaffected families were given jobs in the company.

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project, Complaint against procedural violations, Demand for employment, Demand to get back acquired land

Region Classification


Type of Land


Type of Common Land

Total investment involved (in Crores):


Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

Has the Conflict Ended?


When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Land Acquisition Laws, Forest and Scheduled Area Governance Laws, Environmental Laws

Legislations/Policies Involved

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community? What was the decision of the concerned government department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Legal Status:

Out of Court

Status of Case In Court

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Case Number

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

Whether criminal law was used against protestors

Official name of the criminal law. Did the case reach trial?

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Nature of Protest


Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Government of Madhya Pradesh

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Ultra Tech Cement Limited

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of Corporate Authorities Approached

Other Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Narmada Bachao Andolan, Jai Adivasi Yuva Shakti

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:
No Images Available

Documented By

Satyendra Singh Narwaria

Reviewed By

Satyendra Singh Narwaria

Updated By

Satyendra Singh Narwaria

Edited By

Satyendra Singh NarwariaLand Conflict Watch

Support our work

Your contribution ensures continuity of this crucial project.

As a member, you will get exclusive access to special reports, policy papers and research projects undertaken by Land Conflict Watch and behind-the-scenes interactions with the writers and researchers about their work.
Contribute Now