Meghalaya
Lumshnong
,
Thangskai Village
,
East Jaintia Hills
Published :
Dec 2023
|
Updated :
Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills
Reported by
Sarup Sinha
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
635
People affected
2023
Year started
94
Land area affected
Households affected
635
People Affected
2023
Year started
94
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Industry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Other Kind of Industry
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Industry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Other Kind of Industry
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Fifteen individuals, including nine police officials, were injured after a public hearing for the proposed expansion of cement plants in East Jaintia Hills turned violent on 24 August 2023.

The Meghalaya State Pollution Control Board conducted this hearing in Thangskai village, East Jaintia Hills, to discuss the expansion of M/s Meghalaya Cement Ltd's (Topcem) production capacity from 2600 tonnes per day (TPD) to 4500 TPD.   

The protests were led by the residents of several villages of the Narpuh region and members of the local unit of the Khasi Students’ Union against the plans for the expansion of three cement production units in East Jaintia Hill District: Chiehruphi, Wahiajer, and Thangskai.

The protesters strongly opposed the issuance of a no-objection certificate (NOC) for the expansion, citing concerns about potential environmental degradation. Furthermore, they argued that existing cement plants in the district have neither created employment opportunities for local residents nor fulfilled the promises of ensuring adequate water management and healthcare amenities.

A local resident was quoted in the media saying, “We should get the maximum profit out of these cement industries, and we were promised that 50% of workforce will be locals but as of now we haven’t seen that.”
During the public hearing, the protests turned disorderly as the crowd resorted to vandalism. Health Minister of Meghalaya, Ampareen Lyngdoh, stated that law enforcement had to resort to lathi-charge and firing tear gas shells to contain the situation as the protesters attempted to set the marquee on fire.

District Superintendent of Police, Jagpal Singh Dhanoa, justified the use of force, stating, "Initially, we refrained from substantial action due to the presence of women and children. But as the situation escalated, the use of proportional force became necessary."

A case was filed at the Lumshnong police station following the incident.

According to a pre-feasibility report for the expansion, existing project area is 52.949 hectares, the required project area of 94.20 hectares is already under the possession of Meghalaya Cement Ltd. Once the project has been approved, the land cover will change from "open or vegetated to buildings, roads, storage yards, etc."

The total investment for the expansion project works out to approximately
Rs 135.66 crore. 

The report further states that the total project implementation schedule for this project is considered as 16-18 months from “Zero date” i.e. the date of plant & machinery order placement.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand for employment

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

2024

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Non-agri rural enterprise, Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

136

Type of investment:

Investment Expected

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

5

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Meghalaya State Pollution Control Board

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Khasi Students Union, Hynniewtrep Youth Council

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Sarup Sinha

Sarup is a researcher and doctoral student in Political Science at the North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong. His research interests lie in the area of ethnic and land conflicts, political ecology and development and urban spaces of Northeast India. He has a Masters’ degree in Development Studies from the Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati. He has previously done research/internships with NABARD, Oxford Microfinance Initiative (renamed Oxford Development Consultancy) and CSDS (Lokniti Programme).

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand for employment

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

2024

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Non-agri rural enterprise, Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us