JOIN THE LCW
COMMUNITY

Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, quarterly analytics report, curated expert talks, merchandise and much more. Support our work!

Sign up today

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Reported by

Sarup Sinha

Legal Review by

Anmol Gupta

Edited by

Anupa Sagar Kujur

Updated by

Published on

December 21, 2023

December 22, 2023

Edited on

December 21, 2023

State

Meghalaya

Sector

Industry

People Affected by Conflict

635

Households Affected by Conflict

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

94

ha

Starting Year

2023

Location of Conflict

Thangskai Village

Lumshnong

East Jaintia Hills

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Other Kind of Industry

Land Conflict Summary

Fifteen individuals, including nine police officials, were injured after a public hearing for the proposed expansion of cement plants in East Jaintia Hills turned violent on 24 August 2023.

The Meghalaya State Pollution Control Board conducted this hearing in Thangskai village, East Jaintia Hills, to discuss the expansion of M/s Meghalaya Cement Ltd's (Topcem) production capacity from 2600 tonnes per day (TPD) to 4500 TPD.   

The protests were led by the residents of several villages of the Narpuh region and members of the local unit of the Khasi Students’ Union against the plans for the expansion of three cement production units in East Jaintia Hill District: Chiehruphi, Wahiajer, and Thangskai.

The protesters strongly opposed the issuance of a no-objection certificate (NOC) for the expansion, citing concerns about potential environmental degradation. Furthermore, they argued that existing cement plants in the district have neither created employment opportunities for local residents nor fulfilled the promises of ensuring adequate water management and healthcare amenities.

A local resident was quoted in the media saying, “We should get the maximum profit out of these cement industries, and we were promised that 50% of workforce will be locals but as of now we haven’t seen that.”
During the public hearing, the protests turned disorderly as the crowd resorted to vandalism. Health Minister of Meghalaya, Ampareen Lyngdoh, stated that law enforcement had to resort to lathi-charge and firing tear gas shells to contain the situation as the protesters attempted to set the marquee on fire.

District Superintendent of Police, Jagpal Singh Dhanoa, justified the use of force, stating, "Initially, we refrained from substantial action due to the presence of women and children. But as the situation escalated, the use of proportional force became necessary."

A case was filed at the Lumshnong police station following the incident.

According to a pre-feasibility report for the expansion, existing project area is 52.949 hectares, the required project area of 94.20 hectares is already under the possession of Meghalaya Cement Ltd. Once the project has been approved, the land cover will change from "open or vegetated to buildings, roads, storage yards, etc."

The total investment for the expansion project works out to approximately
Rs 135.66 crore. 

The report further states that the total project implementation schedule for this project is considered as 16-18 months from “Zero date” i.e. the date of plant & machinery order placement.

Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand for employment

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Type of Common Land

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

2024

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Non-agri rural enterprise, Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

136

Type of investment:

Investment Expected

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

5

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Legal Data

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Legislations/Policies Involved

Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006
Clause 2(ii) [Prior environmental clearance has to be obtained from the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change for expansion of projects and addition of capacity beyond specified limits] Point 7(III) [Prior to the grant of Environmental Clearance, public consultation needs to be carried out to hear the concerns of affected persons or stakeholders due to environmental impact of a proposed project]
Environment Protection Rules, 1986
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

No

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Non-consultation with stakeholders

Violation of environmental laws

Legal Status:

Out of Court

Status of Case In Court

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

No

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Case Number

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

Lathicharge/teargas/pellets

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

Yes

Reported Details of the Violation:

Health Minister of Meghalaya, Ampareen Lyngdoh, stated that law enforcement had to resort to lathi-charge and firing tear gas shells to contain the situation as the protesters attempted to set the marquee on fire. District Superintendent of Police, Jagpal Singh Dhanoa, justified the use of force, stating, "Initially, we refrained from substantial action due to the presence of women and children. But as the situation escalated, the use of proportional force became necessary."

Date of Violation

August 23, 2023

Location of Violation

Thangskai Village

Additional Information

Nature of Protest

Property damage/arson

Protests/marches

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Meghalaya State Pollution Control Board

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Khasi Students Union, Hynniewtrep Youth Council

Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Resources

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Images

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Video

Fifteen individuals, including nine police officials, were injured after a public hearing for the proposed expansion of cement plants in East Jaintia Hills turned violent on 24 August 2023.

The Meghalaya State Pollution Control Board conducted this hearing in Thangskai village, East Jaintia Hills, to discuss the expansion of M/s Meghalaya Cement Ltd's (Topcem) production capacity from 2600 tonnes per day (TPD) to 4500 TPD.   

The protests were led by the residents of several villages of the Narpuh region and members of the local unit of the Khasi Students’ Union against the plans for the expansion of three cement production units in East Jaintia Hill District: Chiehruphi, Wahiajer, and Thangskai.

The protesters strongly opposed the issuance of a no-objection certificate (NOC) for the expansion, citing concerns about potential environmental degradation. Furthermore, they argued that existing cement plants in the district have neither created employment opportunities for local residents nor fulfilled the promises of ensuring adequate water management and healthcare amenities.

A local resident was quoted in the media saying, “We should get the maximum profit out of these cement industries, and we were promised that 50% of workforce will be locals but as of now we haven’t seen that.”
During the public hearing, the protests turned disorderly as the crowd resorted to vandalism. Health Minister of Meghalaya, Ampareen Lyngdoh, stated that law enforcement had to resort to lathi-charge and firing tear gas shells to contain the situation as the protesters attempted to set the marquee on fire.

District Superintendent of Police, Jagpal Singh Dhanoa, justified the use of force, stating, "Initially, we refrained from substantial action due to the presence of women and children. But as the situation escalated, the use of proportional force became necessary."

A case was filed at the Lumshnong police station following the incident.

According to a pre-feasibility report for the expansion, existing project area is 52.949 hectares, the required project area of 94.20 hectares is already under the possession of Meghalaya Cement Ltd. Once the project has been approved, the land cover will change from "open or vegetated to buildings, roads, storage yards, etc."

The total investment for the expansion project works out to approximately
Rs 135.66 crore. 

The report further states that the total project implementation schedule for this project is considered as 16-18 months from “Zero date” i.e. the date of plant & machinery order placement.

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand for employment

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Type of Common Land

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

Total investment involved (in Crores):

136

Type of investment:

Investment Expected

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

5

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Legislations/Policies Involved

Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006
Clause 2(ii) [Prior environmental clearance has to be obtained from the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change for expansion of projects and addition of capacity beyond specified limits] Point 7(III) [Prior to the grant of Environmental Clearance, public consultation needs to be carried out to hear the concerns of affected persons or stakeholders due to environmental impact of a proposed project]
Environment Protection Rules, 1986
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

No

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Non-consultation with stakeholders

Violation of environmental laws

Legal Status:

Out of Court

Status of Case In Court

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

No

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Case Number

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

Lathicharge/teargas/pellets

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

Yes

Reported Details of the Violation:

Health Minister of Meghalaya, Ampareen Lyngdoh, stated that law enforcement had to resort to lathi-charge and firing tear gas shells to contain the situation as the protesters attempted to set the marquee on fire. District Superintendent of Police, Jagpal Singh Dhanoa, justified the use of force, stating, "Initially, we refrained from substantial action due to the presence of women and children. But as the situation escalated, the use of proportional force became necessary."

Date of Violation

August 23, 2023

Location of Violation

Thangskai Village

Nature of Protest

Property damage/arson

Protests/marches

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Meghalaya State Pollution Control Board

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Khasi Students Union, Hynniewtrep Youth Council

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Documented By

Text Link

Reviewed By

Text Link

Updated By

Text Link

Edited By

Text LinkLand Conflict Watch

Other Land Conflicts in Meghalaya

cross
Not a member yet?
Sign up now