Madhya Pradesh
Kamankheda, Kelva Khurd, Ricchfal, Nandiya Khedi, Suktapur and Bada Kelva villages
,
Ghoghalgaon
,
Khandwa
Published :
Sep 2016
|
Updated :
May 24, 2026
Compensation delays and rehabilitation struggles in the Omkareshwar dam project, Madhya Pradesh
Reported by
Gourav Jaiswal
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
15500
Households affected
50000
People affected
2003
Year started
5800
ha.
Land area affected
15500
Households affected
50000
People Affected
2003
Year started
5800
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Multipurpose Dam
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Unclassifed
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Multipurpose Dam
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

The Omkareshwar project is a multi-purpose dam project planned across the river Narmada in Khandwa district. Constructed between 2003 and 2007, the dam was designed to irrigate 1.47 lakh hectares of land in Khargone, Dhar, and Khandwa districts, generating 520 MW of electricity through eight power units. The dam was estimated to impact 15,500 families in Khandwa district.

In 2012, 51 farmers from Gopalgaon village launched a 17-day satyagraha_, _which ended after the state government formed a committee to look into the farmers' grievances. They demanded higher compensation for the land allotted to them under the Madhya Pradesh Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy Amendment, 2003. The state accepted their demands and promised them compensation of Rs 2 lakh per acre under the new Madhya Pradesh Rehabilitation package of 2013%20was%20announced.).

Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) activist Alok Agarwal argued that the compensation package was inadequate, claiming that it was less than half the actual market price of the acquired land. According to affected residents, by [2015](http://According to affected residents, by 2015 no farmer had been provided the fertile land promised by the government as part of the compensation and rehabilitation package.), no farmer had been provided the fertile land promised by the government as part of the compensation and rehabilitation package.

In 2015, the farmers launched a Jal Satyagraha after the government raised the water level of the Omkareshwar Dam from 189 metres to 191 metres, which led to severe flooding in villages, with some villages being submerged. More than 70 satyagrahis developed skin disorders and other ailments. However, the people continued to protest against the project. 

On 13 March 2019, the Supreme Court (SC) ordered the state government to allot cultivable land to the dam oustees within three months. The displaced families were offered a choice between land allotment and monetary rehabilitation compensation, along with an additional 15 percent relocation allowance for the relocated families. The decision, by a five-judge bench headed by then Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, came after a petition was filed by NBA.

In late October 2019, the affected people launched another 12-day Jal Satyagraha after the water level was increased to 138.68 meters from the previous maximum of 121.92 meters. This was despite a Supreme Court ruling that required the rehabilitation of affected people before the reservoir's water level was raised. The satyagraha ended after Narmada Hydroelectric Development Corporation (NHDC) Chief General Manager Pawan Sharma gave a written assurance to meet five of the six demands on behalf of the state. The key promises were to develop a rehabilitation site for 500 families and double the compensation package announced in 2013 for 700 families. However, the sixth demand to decrease the water in the catchment area that leads to flooding in the villages was declined, citing technical issues by the NHDC team.

On 7 June 2023, the Madhya Pradesh government announced a special rehabilitation package, providing compensation of Rs 2.5 lakh to landless farmers and their children.

In December 2024, the Madhya Pradesh High Court issued two orders, one related to compensation for families affected by the Omkareshwar project. On 4 December, it directed the state government to consider extending compensation to adult sons of affected farmers who had been excluded from earlier rehabilitation packages. On 6 December, the court directed the government to revise the compensation process and eligibility criteria.

Despite the court's clear instructions, the affected people had not been compensated as on July 2025. In light of the failure to comply with the directives, the High Court issued contempt notices to the state’s Additional Chief Secretary, citing lapses in the implementation process. 

In June and July 2025, families affected by the project gathered to relaunch Jal Satyagraha in Bhopal’s Neelam Park, demanding proper rehabilitation. They argued that the compensation of Rs 2 lakh per acre is much below the current market rates which will render farmers incapable of buying new land.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for more compensation than promised

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand for promised land

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

Arrest

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

Chittropa Palit, a senior Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) activist, was arrested and jailed along with other Jal Satyagrahis.

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Released from arrest

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project completed

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

1784.29

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2008

Page Number In Investment Document:

8

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Narmada Valley Development Authority; Narmada Control Authority; Narmada Hydroelectric Development Corporation

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Narmada Valley Development Authority, Narmada Control Authority, Narmada Hydroelectric Development Corporation

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Narmada Valley Development Authority

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Narmada Bachao Andolan

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

Arrest

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

Chittropa Palit, a senior Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) activist, was arrested and jailed along with other Jal Satyagrahis.

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Released from arrest

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Gourav Jaiswal
Show more work
Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for more compensation than promised

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand for promised land

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project completed

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us