Manipur
,
,
Kakching
Published : 12 July, 2014   |   Last updated - 24 Jun, 2024
Manipur Government Orders Eviction of 25 Villages from Pumlen Pat Wetland
Reported by
Anurag Das
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Updated by
Anupa Kujur
500
Households affected
People Affected
2020
Year started
3200
Land area affected
500
Households affected
People Affected
2020
Year started
3200
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Environmental/Ecological Damage
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

On March 23, 2021, the Kakching district administration issued an eviction order of ‘unauthorised occupation and activity within the Pumlen Pat wetland’. The ‘encroachers’ were given 30 days to vacate the land. The administration explained that the eviction drive was an attempt to “preserve the wetland of vital importance”.

According to the government, wetlands in the state have been facing ecological deterioration for the last three decades because of illegal settlements. Pumlen Pat is a shallow, weed-infested lake situated 55 kilometres from the capital, Imphal. It is also the second-largest lake in Manipur, with two-thirds of its water covered with phumdi (floating biomass). According to the 2011 Census, Pumlen Pat has a settlement of 25 villages.

People living on the wetland and local organisations have strongly opposed the government’s move. According to them, their traditional way of living is interconnected with the wetland ecosystem and they depend on the lake for their livelihood and sustenance.

Vishal Aribam, who works with a local non-profit, told LCW that 'the notification has created a dire sense of insecurity in the minds of thousands of people whose lives are traditionally dependent on the wetland'.

A local organisation representing the 25 villages, Pumlen Pat Khoidou Lamjao Kanba Apunba (LUP), has termed the eviction order in the middle of the COVID-19 pandemic ‘inhuman in nature’. LUP Secretary Salam Joy told the media that the residents have been living on the wetland for generations. “The failure of the state in acknowledging our rights to live here, or any law that claims we are trespassers, is blatantly unconstitutional and against the fundamental principles of humanity,” he said, adding that the definition of ‘encroachers’ in the context of Pumlen Pat residents is ‘vague’ and that encroachment ‘cannot be equated with the degradation of land claimed by the government, which is in reality being caused by the inundation of the Ithai Barrage’. The LUP has also demanded the government to declare Pumlen Pat a Community Conservation Area and a Biodiversity Heritage Site.

The organisation wrote to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Chief Minister Biren Singh and to the district administration stating that the eviction order violates the fundamental right to life and livelihood enshrined in the Constitution. It asked for immediate withdrawal of the order.

Meanwhile, a remote sensing survey report found that Pumlen Pat is among the highly degraded lakes in Manipur and is almost on the verge of extinction due to the Loktak Lake Redevelopment Project.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

1) To withdraw the eviction order 2) To declare Pumlen Pat wasteland as a ‘Community Conservation Area’ and a ‘Biodiversity Heritage Site’

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Author
Reported by
Anurag Das

Manipur

Kumar Sambhav is a social entrepreneur and award-winning journalist, leading innovative research in accountability investigations. He is the founder of Land Conflict Watch and is currently working as India Research Lead with Princeton University’s Digital Witness Lab.

Read More

Latest updates
Rajasthan
Rajasthan

UIT Bikaner's Jorbeer Housing Project on Stalls Following Rajasthan High Court Order

Rajasthan
Rajasthan

Jaipur Development Authority Acquires Land for Township Project, Ending Conflict

Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh

Farmers land acquired under Mansarovar Housing Scheme in Lucknow

Maharashtra
Maharashtra

Citizens unite against cycle track around Powai, Vihar Lakes in Mumbai

Jharkhand
Jharkhand

Families displaced by Mandal Dam in Jharkhand opppose project resumption

Jharkhand
Jharkhand

Jharkhand approves Adani's thermal plant, farmers allege violation of LARR Act

Gujarat
Gujarat

Pastoral Community in Gujarat's Banni Grasslands Demands Titles Recognising Community Forest Rights

Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh

Builder Encroaches Upon Farmers Land in Gosaiganj Lucknow, 150 Allottees in Lurch

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Manipur Government Orders Eviction of 25 Villages from Pumlen Pat Wetland

Reported by

Anurag Das

Legal Review by

Anmol Gupta, Mukta Joshi

Edited by

Moushumi Sharma

Updated by

Updated by

Published on

January 12, 2022

May 20, 2022

Edited on

January 12, 2022

Sector

Land Use

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Environmental/Ecological Damage

Starting Year

2020

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

3200

ha

Households Affected by Conflict

500

People Affected by Conflict

State

Manipur

Sector

Land Use

People Affected by Conflict

Households Affected by Conflict

500

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

3200

ha

Starting Year

2020

Location of Conflict

Kakching

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Environmental/Ecological Damage

Land Conflict Summary

On March 23, 2021, the Kakching district administration issued an eviction order of ‘unauthorised occupation and activity within the Pumlen Pat wetland’. The ‘encroachers’ were given 30 days to vacate the land. The administration explained that the eviction drive was an attempt to “preserve the wetland of vital importance”.

According to the government, wetlands in the state have been facing ecological deterioration for the last three decades because of illegal settlements. Pumlen Pat is a shallow, weed-infested lake situated 55 kilometres from the capital, Imphal. It is also the second-largest lake in Manipur, with two-thirds of its water covered with phumdi (floating biomass). According to the 2011 Census, Pumlen Pat has a settlement of 25 villages.

People living on the wetland and local organisations have strongly opposed the government’s move. According to them, their traditional way of living is interconnected with the wetland ecosystem and they depend on the lake for their livelihood and sustenance.

Vishal Aribam, who works with a local non-profit, told LCW that 'the notification has created a dire sense of insecurity in the minds of thousands of people whose lives are traditionally dependent on the wetland'.

A local organisation representing the 25 villages, Pumlen Pat Khoidou Lamjao Kanba Apunba (LUP), has termed the eviction order in the middle of the COVID-19 pandemic ‘inhuman in nature’. LUP Secretary Salam Joy told the media that the residents have been living on the wetland for generations. “The failure of the state in acknowledging our rights to live here, or any law that claims we are trespassers, is blatantly unconstitutional and against the fundamental principles of humanity,” he said, adding that the definition of ‘encroachers’ in the context of Pumlen Pat residents is ‘vague’ and that encroachment ‘cannot be equated with the degradation of land claimed by the government, which is in reality being caused by the inundation of the Ithai Barrage’. The LUP has also demanded the government to declare Pumlen Pat a Community Conservation Area and a Biodiversity Heritage Site.

The organisation wrote to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Chief Minister Biren Singh and to the district administration stating that the eviction order violates the fundamental right to life and livelihood enshrined in the Constitution. It asked for immediate withdrawal of the order.

Meanwhile, a remote sensing survey report found that Pumlen Pat is among the highly degraded lakes in Manipur and is almost on the verge of extinction due to the Loktak Lake Redevelopment Project.

Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

1) To withdraw the eviction order 2) To declare Pumlen Pat wasteland as a ‘Community Conservation Area’ and a ‘Biodiversity Heritage Site’

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Type of Common Land

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Legal Data

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Legislations/Policies Involved

Manipur Land Revenue and Land Reforms Act, 1960
Section 11 [All public lands, rivers, water courses, etc. which are not the property of any person are considered to be the property of the government]; Section 13 [Deputy Commissioner may set aside any land belonging to the government for pasturage of village cattle/forest reserves or any other purpose]; Section 15 [Any person occupying government land without lawful authority will be regarded as trespasser and may be evicted]
Wetlands (Conservation and Management) Rules, 2017
Section 4 [Prohibited activities in wetlands to include conversion for non-wetland uses, setting up industries and constructions of a permanent nature]
Manipur Loktak Lake (Protection) Act, 2006
Section 36 [Union government is responsible for identifying and monitoring areas rich in biological resources and to take immediate measures for protecting such areas]; Section 37 [State government to declare biodiversity heritage sites in areas of biodiversity importance in consultation with local bodies]
Biological Diversity Act, 2002
Section 36 [Union government is responsible for identifying and monitoring areas rich in biological resources and to take immediate measures for protecting such areas]; Section 37 [State government to declare biodiversity heritage sites in areas of biodiversity importance in consultation with local bodies]
Constitution of India, 1950
Article 21 [Fundamental right to life with dignity, and includes the right to livelihood]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Forced evictions/dispossession of land

Violation of free prior informed consent

Non-rehabilitation of displaced people

Lack of legal protection over land rights

Violation of environmental laws

Legal Status:

Out of Court

Status of Case In Court

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

No

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Case Number

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

No items found.

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Kakching district administration

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Pumlen Pat Khoidou Lamjao Kanba Apunba (LUP)

Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Resources

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Images

Pumlen Pat wetland

Image Credit:  

Vishal Aribam

Pumlen Pat_wetland

Image Credit:  

Vishal Aribam

Video

Ngamee Lup, Facebook

Other Land Conflicts in Manipur

cross
    Not a member yet?
    Sign up now
    Conflicts Map
    Conflict Database
    About Us