Manipur
,
,
Kakching
Published :
Jan 2022
|
Updated :
Manipur Government Orders Eviction of 25 Villages from Pumlen Pat Wetland
Reported by
Anurag Das
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
500
Households affected
People affected
2020
Year started
3200
Land area affected
500
Households affected
People Affected
2020
Year started
3200
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Environmental/Ecological Damage
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Environmental/Ecological Damage
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

On March 23, 2021, the Kakching district administration issued an eviction order of ‘unauthorised occupation and activity within the Pumlen Pat wetland’. The ‘encroachers’ were given 30 days to vacate the land. The administration explained that the eviction drive was an attempt to “preserve the wetland of vital importance”.

According to the government, wetlands in the state have been facing ecological deterioration for the last three decades because of illegal settlements. Pumlen Pat is a shallow, weed-infested lake situated 55 kilometres from the capital, Imphal. It is also the second-largest lake in Manipur, with two-thirds of its water covered with phumdi (floating biomass). According to the 2011 Census, Pumlen Pat has a settlement of 25 villages.

People living on the wetland and local organisations have strongly opposed the government’s move. According to them, their traditional way of living is interconnected with the wetland ecosystem and they depend on the lake for their livelihood and sustenance.

Vishal Aribam, who works with a local non-profit, told LCW that 'the notification has created a dire sense of insecurity in the minds of thousands of people whose lives are traditionally dependent on the wetland'.

A local organisation representing the 25 villages, Pumlen Pat Khoidou Lamjao Kanba Apunba (LUP), has termed the eviction order in the middle of the COVID-19 pandemic ‘inhuman in nature’. LUP Secretary Salam Joy told the media that the residents have been living on the wetland for generations. “The failure of the state in acknowledging our rights to live here, or any law that claims we are trespassers, is blatantly unconstitutional and against the fundamental principles of humanity,” he said, adding that the definition of ‘encroachers’ in the context of Pumlen Pat residents is ‘vague’ and that encroachment ‘cannot be equated with the degradation of land claimed by the government, which is in reality being caused by the inundation of the Ithai Barrage’. The LUP has also demanded the government to declare Pumlen Pat a Community Conservation Area and a Biodiversity Heritage Site.

The organisation wrote to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Chief Minister Biren Singh and to the district administration stating that the eviction order violates the fundamental right to life and livelihood enshrined in the Constitution. It asked for immediate withdrawal of the order.

Meanwhile, a remote sensing survey report found that Pumlen Pat is among the highly degraded lakes in Manipur and is almost on the verge of extinction due to the Loktak Lake Redevelopment Project.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

1) To withdraw the eviction order 2) To declare Pumlen Pat wasteland as a ‘Community Conservation Area’ and a ‘Biodiversity Heritage Site’

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Kakching district administration

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Pumlen Pat Khoidou Lamjao Kanba Apunba (LUP)

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Anurag Das

Anurag is an independent researcher currently based in Guwahati, Assam. He has completed his Master’s in Peace and Conflict Studies from the Tata Institute of Social Sciences. He believes research is all about looking at the other side of the coin. His core interest areas are insurgency, ethnic nationalism, resource conflict and militarisation.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us