Chhattisgarh
,
Kendai
,
Korba
Published :
Jan 2026
|
Updated :
Kendai’s polluted waters and dying vegetation: How coal mining is impacting Pando tribes in Chhattisgarh
Reported by
Sukriti Vats
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Rakshit Dhingra
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
609
Households affected
2467
People affected
2025
Year started
2216.95
ha.
Land area affected
609
Households affected
2467
People Affected
2025
Year started
2216.95
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Coal Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Unclassifed
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Coal Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In Chhattisgarh's Kendai village, the Pando tribe, classified as a Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group (PVTG), continues to bear the brunt of coal mining. Two decades ago, the South Eastern Coalfields Limited (SECL) began operating the Rani Atari and Vijay West mines. Part of the village’s common forestland, over which residents held nistar (customary) rights, was acquired for the project at a time when they had little understanding of their legal entitlements.

Mining residue has contaminated their water bodies. The river stream they once used for irrigation, livestock drinking, and fishing has blackened, killing nearby crops and fish. Underground water volume has drastically reduced, lowering the level in dug wells. The available water in wells, however, are mixed with toxins, making drinking water inaccessible. Villagers now walk to the Bamni river, a tributary of the Hasdeo, located 5 km away, to catch fish and collect water for daily use.

The community’s CFR claim remains pending, which villagers believe is due to the government’s plans to expand mining. Around 26 families received IFR titles in 2008 and 2017, but progress has been uneven. Many families are still waiting for titles, and several who received them were granted less land than they claimed.

On the IFR plots, they grow maize, 'dhan' (paddy), balihari/bajra, and 'kodo' (millets). However, agricultural yields have declined, forcing villagers to travel to neighbouring hamlets for wage labour. They can no longer gather and sell forest produce like 'mahua' (Madhuca longifolia), tendu (Diospyros melanoxylon), and 'charota' (Cassia tora), which no longer grow in the area since forest produce has also been affected by mining dust.

While SECL has provided a 'samudayik bhawan' (community hall) for meetings and relocated the village school closer to the settlement, it has failed to provide functioning water facilities. The water tanker system they installed does not supply water. The company has also reportedly not provided electricity, constructed roads, or delivered development works that should have been undertaken through the District Mineral Foundation (DMF).

The village falls under a Scheduled V area, where the Panchayat Extension to Scheduled Areas (PESA) Act applies. Despite passing multiple Gram Sabha resolutions opposing the two mining projects, and repeatedly demanding water and other basic facilities from district and state officials as well as revenue authorities, even holding a press conference at the district headquarters, no action has been taken by the authorities.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for better access to common land/resources

Demand for compensation

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand to cancel the project

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Water bodies, Fishing, Residential area, Grazing, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

South Eastern Coalfields Limited

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Ekta Parishad

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Sukriti Vats
Show more work
Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for better access to common land/resources

Demand for compensation

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand to cancel the project

Opposition against environmental degradation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Water bodies, Fishing, Residential area, Grazing, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us