Maharashtra
,
,
Mumbai Suburban
Published :
Jul 2026
|
Updated :
Goregaon–Mulund Link Road: Opposition, contestation over evictions, forest diversion and rehabilitation
Reported by
Shubham Kothari
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Rakshit Dhingra, Amrita Chekkutty
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
252
Households affected
1210
People affected
2024
Year started
19.43
ha.
Land area affected
252
Households affected
1210
People Affected
2024
Year started
19.43
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Roads
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Unclassifed
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Roads
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
1
Summary

The Goregaon–Mulund Link Road (GMLR) is a 12.20-km east–west corridor that includes twin tunnels (4.7 km each) under Sanjay Gandhi National Park (SGNP) connecting Mumbai’s Western and Eastern Express Highways. In 2024, Habalepada residents blocked GMLR road surveys, alleging the project would affect their farmlands and homes and that they are protected under the Forest Rights Act (FRA).
Environmentalists raised concerns over the diversion of 19.43 hectares of reserved forest land from SGNP for tunnel construction. On 2 January 2024, the Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate (MoEF&CC) granted in-principle (Stage I) approval under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, for the forest land diversion. Despite civil society objections, the project continued with proponents claiming it would cut travel time from 75–90 minutes to about 25 minutes and require less tree felling than alternative alignments. 

Stage II clearance granted in 2025

On July 1–2, 2025, the MoEF&CC granted the Stage II clearance for the diversion of 19.43 ha of SGNP forest land to the corporation. After the Stage II clearance in July, the Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) assembly and other preparatory work for the tunnel began in the latter half of 2025. As part of rehabilitation planning, the BMC had conducted a survey in 2022 that identified 276 eligible residential and commercial structures for rehabilitation and 89 others as ineligible. Government officials stated that those who were declared ineligible in the annexure draft were given opportunities to challenge the findings before the final list was released.

Rehabilitation complex constructed

By March 2026, the corporation had constructed a 906-flat rehabilitation complex in Kanjurmarg West (Runwal Forest), with 252 flats reserved for initial handover to GMLR project-affected families. On 31 May 2026, the BMC demolished around 150 unauthorised residential and commercial structures in Amar Nagar and Khindipada. On June 4 and 5, 2026, the BMC carried out a second demolition drive, clearing the remaining 234 structures, thereby completing the clearance of all 384 identified encroachments. According to the BMC, the phased demolition was to facilitate TBM assembly and allow underground tunnel excavation to commence in June, just before the arrival of the monsoon.

Rehabilitation, demolition, and project investment

The Municipal Corporation claimed to have provided rehabilitation to 250 eligible families in the Kanjurmarg West colony, with 252 flats to be handed over at the end of June. Many residents alleged that documentation errors, procedural irregularities, and survey lapses had led to wrongful elimination from the eligibility list. Some residents said they had lived in the area since the 1980s–1990s, but were not counted or were removed from eligibility lists. Even among those declared eligible, some could not take possession because they could not pay the ₹40,000 required for the flat handover.
Residents claimed that the eviction during the monsoon violated the Maharashtra government’s monsoon eviction ban, which prohibits demolition of any unauthorised structures during the period of June to September. The tunnel component is estimated to cost ₹6,300 crore out of the project’s total estimated cost, including all 4 phases, which is ₹14,000 crore. The first flyover (Dindoshi–SGNP) was expected to open by May 2026, with the twin tunnels targeted for completion by October 2028 and full project operationalisation by 2029. 

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Complaint against procedural violations

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Common and Private

Forest and Non-Forest, Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

2029

Whether the Project has been Delayed

No

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Dwelling/habitation use

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

4770

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2020

Page Number In Investment Document:

1

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC), Government of Maharashtra, Maharashtra Urban Development Department (UDD)

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Shubham Kothari

Shubham is a housing rights activist based in Mumbai. He has a post graduate from the Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai in urban policy and governance.

Show more work
Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Complaint against procedural violations

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

2029

Whether the Project has been Delayed

No

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Dwelling/habitation use

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us