Madhya Pradesh
Khairahi, Nagwan and Karsualal villages of Mahan block; Chhatrasal, Amelia and Dongri Tal II forest blocks
,
Bandhaura
,
Singrauli
Published :
Sep 2016
|
Updated :
June 11, 2026
Contested coal mining, procedural lapses, and tribal livelihood threats in the Mahan forests of Singrauli, Madhya Pradesh
Reported by
Gourav Jaiswal
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
2917
Households affected
14000
People affected
2006
Year started
1900
ha.
Land area affected
2917
Households affected
14000
People Affected
2006
Year started
1900
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Coal Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Unclassifed
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Coal Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Mahan Coal Limited is a 50:50 joint venture between Hindalco Industries of the Aditya Birla Group and Essar Power. It plans to extract coal from the Mahan coal block of Singrauli in Madhya Pradesh and supply it to the proposed power plants of Essar and Hindalco. Essar Power has invested Rs 4,000 crore for a 1,000-megawatt power project, while Hindalco is setting up a 750-megawatt captive power plant and has invested Rs 2,400 crore in it.

Mahan Coal Limited is a 50:50 joint venture between Hindalco Industries of the Aditya Birla Group and Essar Power, which plans to extract coal from the Mahan coal block of Singrauli in Madhya Pradesh and supply it to the proposed power plants of Essar

To mine the coal, Mahan Coal Limited needs access to 1,000 hectares of forestland, which falls under the environment ministry's no-go zone. This forest land is home to Asia's oldest Sal forests, besides being a source of livelihood for the tribal communities living there, who collect and sell forest produce, such as mahua and tendu leaves. 
Mahan Sangharsh Samiti (MSS) was formed in the year 2012 by the local people who do not support coal mining in Singrauli.

In January 2011, a survey done by the Central Pollution Control Board and IIT Delhi identified the Singrauli coalfield region (of which Mahan is a part) as the seventh most critically polluted area in the country. The region scored 81.73 on the Comprehensive Environmental Pollution Index, which led to a moratorium (moratorium means a legally authorised postponement/delay before some obligations are discharged) on further expansion of mining in the area. But soon after the order, the Madhya Pradesh State Pollution Control Board submitted a remedial plan and lifted the moratorium.

To grant permission to mine coal, the environment ministry required the company to meet 36 conditions, including the holding of free and fair Village Assembly meetings for the people to decide whether they wanted a mine or not. In March 2013, a special Village Assembly convened in Amelia village in Mahan was reportedly fraudulent. Although 184 people attended the meeting, the resolution, which showed approval for Essar's mining project, had 1,125 signatures; most of them were forged--seven of the signatories had been dead for three years.

Despite this, in December 2013, the project was granted Stage II forest clearance and Stage I clearance in February 2014.
In 2014, the Mahan Sangharsh Samiti filed a case in the National Green Tribunal challenging the forest clearance accorded to the proposed coal mine. In March 2015, the allocation of the coal mine was cancelled. However, the people are still struggling to get compensation and rehabilitation due to the displacement caused by the Essar Mahan power plant.

In 2016, the Ministry of Coal allotted the Amelia coal block to THDC India Limited (formerly known as Tehri Hydro Development Corporation) for supplying coal to the Khurja Super Thermal Power Project. However, people whose land was acquired were not paid any compensation and were told not to carry out any work in their homes where the land was acquired. From December 2016 to March 2017, community members held a protest pressuring the local administration to resolve land acquisition issues. But during the protest, six people were arrested and jailed for five days.

By 2019, many people affected by the Essar Mahan power plant were resettled in areas with subpar living conditions and a lack of facilities. A villager told the media that many were compensated with a meagre amount of Rs 8,000 as opposed to the promised sum.
In March 2020, THDC India Limited stated in its monthly report that "an initial list of eligible PAFs (project-affected families) for resettlement benefits has been finalised”. However, District Collector KVS Choudary said that the publication of the list has been delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown.

Since March 2020, the original Essar–Hindalco Mahan coal project has not been revived, but new mining plans have taken shape in Singrauli. The government has allotted nearby blocks, such as Mara II Mahan and Dhirauli, to Adani’s Mahan Energen, sparking controversy as these forests were previously marked as “no-go” areas due to their biodiversity.

Locals continue to resist, citing pollution, deforestation, and poor rehabilitation. Many families displaced earlier still lack fair compensation. Protests have flared, including road blockades after accidents with coal trucks. Meanwhile, reports accuse Adani of tree cutting and rights violations without proper clearances, while the government pushes ahead with mining despite opposition.

In January 2026, the Forest Advisory Committee (FAC) gave conditional in-principle approval, after which the company submitted its Stage-I forest clearance on 16 February. After 3 days of approval, on 19 February 2026, the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change granted clearance for the project, which will require felling of 9,787 trees. Besides this, a compensatory plantation is planned on 24 hectares of non-forest in Charbaheria village, Narsinghpur district, far from Singrauli. 

On 21 May 2026, the Supreme Court declined to interfere with the environmental clearance granted to the project while hearing a plea filed by environmental activist Ajay Dubey.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for more compensation than promised

Demand for rehabilitation

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand for promised compensation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Yes

Source/Reference

<https://frontline.thehindu.com/social-issues/an-ongoing-battle/article9831547.ece>

Total investment involved (in Crores):

6400

Type of investment:

Investment Made

Year of Estimation

2006

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Ministry of Coal; Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Aditya Birla Group; Essar Power Limited; Hindalco Industries Limited; THDC India Limited

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Gond and other tribal communities

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Gourav Jaiswal
Show more work
Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for more compensation than promised

Demand for rehabilitation

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand for promised compensation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Yes

Source/Reference

<https://frontline.thehindu.com/social-issues/an-ongoing-battle/article9831547.ece>

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us