Assam
,
Dahikata
,
Goalpara
Published :
Sep 2026
|
Updated :
Forest reclamation, eviction, and community displacement in the Dahikata Reserved Forest, Assam
Reported by
Sarup Sinha
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Rakshit Dhingra, Amrita Chekkutty
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
548
Households affected
2630
People affected
2025
Year started
152.17
ha.
Land area affected
548
Households affected
2630
People Affected
2025
Year started
152.17
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Encroachment by Non-Right Holders (Other than Caste-based)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Unclassifed
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Encroachment by Non-Right Holders (Other than Caste-based)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

On 9 November 2025, the Assam government began a large anti-encroachment operation in the Dahikata Reserved Forest in Goalpara district, clearing more than 1,140 bighas (about 376 acres) of land. Over two days, almost 548 families were evicted as excavators and bulldozers entered the reserve under the Matia Revenue Circle to remove unauthorised buildings.

“Necessary measures were taken to ensure law and order throughout the operation. Our objective is to reclaim every inch of government forest land that has been illegally occupied,” an official said.

Forest officials note that illegal settlements and deforestation in Dahikata Reserved Forest have intensified human–elephant conflict and undermined conservation efforts.

Addressing reporters, Special Chief Secretary of the State Forest Department, M K Yadava, stated that Dahikata is part of the Sri Sri Surya Pahar heritage site and serves as a critical corridor for the movement of wild elephants. “Today, we have returned this land from human occupation back to the elephants. From tomorrow, we will begin installing fencing and initiate reforestation efforts to restore the natural ecosystem,” he said.

According to District Commissioner Pradip Timung, ‘All the families [about 580 families] occupying the forest were issued notices well in advance’. Officials claim that about 70 percent of these families vacated voluntarily and the remaining structures could be demolished with minor resistance.

Despite official claims of a smooth eviction, scenes of distress were visible at the site as homes were demolished. A few people were reportedly detained when they attempted to block the bulldozers. Among those detained was Abdul Hai, a local leader of the All India United Democratic Front (AIUDF), who reportedly tried to intervene during the eviction.

Many of the affected residents—mostly Bengali-speaking Muslims—claimed they had lived in the area for decades and possessed land documents. “This land is our only home. If we had other land, we wouldn’t be here. Now we have nowhere to go,” said an elderly resident. Another woman alleged, “We are being targeted just because we are Muslims.”

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

Detention

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

1

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Dwelling/habitation use, Other natural resource collection/dependence, Food and Subsistence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Goalpara District Administration; Matia Revenue Circle; Assam Forest Department; Assam Police

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

Detention

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

1

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Sarup Sinha

Sarup is a researcher and doctoral student in Political Science at the North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong. His research interests lie in the area of ethnic and land conflicts, political ecology and development and urban spaces of Northeast India. He has a Masters’ degree in Development Studies from the Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati. He has previously done research/internships with NABARD, Oxford Microfinance Initiative (renamed Oxford Development Consultancy) and CSDS (Lokniti Programme).

Show more work
JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us