Rajasthan
,
Rewari
,
Jaisalmer
Published :
Nov 2023
|
Updated :
Rajasthan's Rewari village opposes land transfer to Adani Group for solar project
Reported by
Sukriti Vats
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
251
Households affected
1208
People affected
2021
Year started
834
Land area affected
251
Households affected
1208
People Affected
2021
Year started
834
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Renewable Power
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Renewable Power
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Rewari villagers in Rajasthan's Jaisalmer have been protesting against the state government's move to transfer land to the Adani Group for setting up a 450MW solar power plant.

The government has allotted 834 hectares of land to SBE Renewables Ten Project Pvt. Ltd, a subsidiary of the Adani Group, for the construction of a solar power plant. This is a part of Adani Group's hybrid solar and wind power plant to generate renewable energy. The cost of the project, acquired via the bidding process, is not available in the public domain.

During the protests, villagers stated that the SBE International did not give jobs to locals as promised under the project even as they lost all forms of livelihood, forcing them to travel to the district headquarters for labourer jobs. Several of them were also detained during the protest held on May 8, 2022.

Villagers claimed that SBE Renewables began taking over the government land in the village in 2021 after a meeting was held by the officials with the residents to inform them of the benefits. However, the villagers quickly realised that the benefits were promised in exchange for the land they had been using for several generations. 

The land was documented in the revenue records as a "banjar" (unoccupied and uncultivable) land, but villagers used it for cultivation and grazing their cattle. In exchange, they annually paid a trespassing (TP) fine to the revenue authorities.

Villagers said that the land allotted to the company had ponds and catchment areas that were used by the farmers and cattle alike. They also used the land to access different parts of the village. However, since all of this land was not legally recorded in any other category (grazing, ponds, sacred land), it was allotted to the company on a lease of 30 years.

While a court case was filed against the company terming the allotment as 'illegal,' since on paper everything was done legally, the judge decided against the villagers. The judge also invoked the Special Reliefs Act stating that no injunction could be passed against this infrastructure project, which would be of "great important to mother earth and entire humanity."

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for better access to common land/resources

Demand for employment

Demand to cancel the project

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Grazing Land), Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

Detention

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Released from detention

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

No

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

No, they were not produced before a magistrate at all

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

They were released within 24 hours

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Lawyer - Moti Singh (9828085442) Villager Mohabata Ram claimed that he was taken to jail after the protest but released the next day.

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Grazing, Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Not Available

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Court decision not in favour of community

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Fatehgarh Tehsildar, District Collector, Rajasthan Revenue and Energy Department

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

-

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Yes

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Adani Group subsidiary - SBE Renewables Ten Project Pvt. Ltd.

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Yes

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Villagers and Jal Grahan Vikas Sanstha of Riwadi

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

Detention

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Released from detention

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

No

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

No, they were not produced before a magistrate at all

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

They were released within 24 hours

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Sukriti Vats
Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for better access to common land/resources

Demand for employment

Demand to cancel the project

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

No, they were not produced before a magistrate at all

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Grazing, Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us