Gujarat
,
Chikasa, Porbandar
,
Porbandar
Published :
|
Updated :
Effluent disposal, coastal pollution risks, and fisherfolk concerns: The Jetpur–Porbandar Deep Sea Effluent Pipeline conflict
Reported by
Jui Gusani
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
2021
Year started
ha.
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2021
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Waste Management
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Unclassifed
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Waste Management
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Following directives from the National Green Tribunal and the Gujarat High Court to stop the excessive chemical pollution in the Bhadar river, caused by the textile industries of Jetpur, the Gujarat Government proposed the Jetpur-Porbandar deep sea effluent disposal pipeline in 2020. According to this Rs. 675 crore project, the treated effluents collected from two existing Common Effluent Treatment Plants (CETPs) at Jetpur and Bhat Gam, respectively, and one proposed CETP at Manpar Derdi would be released into deep sea from the coast of Porbandar. This would be executed through a 114-kilometer-long underground conveyance pipeline crossing 41 villages from Jetpur to Porbandar and a 5 km offshore deep-sea outfall originating from a collection sump in Chikasa, a village in Porbandar.

The project, however, has faced strong opposition from the local fisherfolk, inland farmers, and environmental activists. They contend that releasing 80 MLD (Million Litres per Day) of treated chemical effluent into the sea will destroy critical fish breeding habitats and fish populations, contaminate marine life and jeopardize the fishing industry economy that yields 6 lakh tonnes annually and generates ₹5,000 crore in seafood exports every year. Additionally, local farmers express concern over potential soil contamination and crop loss from pipeline leakages along agricultural tracts.

Meanwhile, on October 28, 2021, Jetpur Industrial Pipeline Project Private Limited was awarded the work order for the project, expecting to complete it within 36 months of the work order date. As news of the project spread, the Kharva (traditional fisherfolk) community of Porbandar organized local meetings, raised public awareness, and sent formal appeal letters to the District Collector requesting the cancellation of the project.

The matter triggered an even stronger opposition to the project after the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) clearance was granted in January, 2024. It also led to the formation of a grassroots committee called ‘Save Porbandar Sea’. With the committee’s help, Shree Porbandar Samasta Kharva Gnati organised a massive rally on 15 December, 2024. Hundreds of people of Porbandar dressed in black clothes took out a symbolic "shamshan yatra” (cremation march) to oppose the Jetpur-Porbandar pipeline. Soon after, on December 26, 2024, Porbandar observed a complete voluntary commercial shutdown (Porbandar Sajjad Bandh), with local merchant associations shutting down major commercial hubs, including Soni Bazar and M.G. Road, in solidarity with the fishing community. People from nearby coastal towns also observed the strike. Fishing union leaders warned that if the state proceeded with deep-sea dumping, over 300,000 fisherfolk across Gujarat's 1,600 km coastline would launch statewide street demonstrations.

In February 2025, the Gujarat Samast Kharva Samaj and the Shree Porbandar Machhimar Boat Association challenged the project in court by filing a writ petition (Special Civil Application No. 2333/2025) in the Gujarat High Court against the Union of India, State of Gujarat, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gujarat Coastal Zone Management Authority, and Jetpur Industrial Pipeline Project Private Limited. The petitioners argued that discharging industrial effluent into marine commons violates Article 21 (Right to Livelihood), Article 48-A (Environmental Protection), and Article 51A(g) of the Constitution. They sought the cancellation of the CRZ Clearance and alleged that the proposed discharge of effluent into the sea would violate the Water Act, 1974 and the Wildlife Act, 1972. The High Court issued formal show-cause notices to the respondents. While state assembly disclosures reveal that over ₹108 crore has been spent on the Jetpur pipeline infrastructure, physical execution remains stalled on the ground due to ongoing public resistance and pending judicial review.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the CRZ Clearance

Region Classification

Urban and Rural

Type of Land

Common

Coastal

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project stalled

Original Project Deadline

2024

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Fishing, Agricultural land, Conservation / protection of ecosystems and species, Food and Subsistence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Yes

Source/Reference

<https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/gujarats-deep-sea-pipeline-remains-a-non-starter/article38314925.ece> , https://icsf.net/newss/gujarat-hc-seeks-response-on-fisherfolks-effluent-petition/

Total investment involved (in Crores):

₹

675

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gujarat State Forest and Environment Department, Gujarat Coastal Zone Management Authority

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Gujarat Water Infrastructure Limited (GWIL)

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Jetpur Industrial Pipeline Project Private Limited

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Gujarat Samast Kharva Samaj, Shree Porbandar Samast Kharva Gnati, Shree Porbandar Macchimar Boat Association, Shree Akhil Gujarat Macchimar Mahamandal (AGMM), Save Porbandar Sea

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Jui Gusani
Jui is an independent researcher currently based in Gujarat. She holds a Post Graduate Diploma in Forestry Management from the Indian Institute of Forest Management, Bhopal. Her core interest areas are natural resource governance, climate adaptation, and environmental policy.
Show more work
JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us