Andhra Pradesh
Pulicat Lake
,
Juvvaladinne, Isakapallipalem, and Chennayapalem
,
Nellore and Tirupati
Published :
|
Updated :
Competition over Fishing Grounds between Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh Fishers
Reported by
Samrita Shankar
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
2014
Year started
ha.
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2014
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Industry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Fisheries
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Unclassifed
Sector
Industry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Fisheries
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

The dispute concerns mechanised trawlers from northern Tamil Nadu entering Andhra Pradesh's territorial waters, including: traditional fishing zones reserved for small-scale fishers, areas around Pulicat Lake, nearshore fishing grounds off Nellore and Tirupati districts. Andhra Pradesh alleges that these larger boats fish illegally within its territorial waters and damage the livelihoods of its traditional fishing communities.

For over a decade, fishermen in coastal villages such as Juvvaladinne, Isakapallipalem, and Chennayapalem have raised concerns over systematic intrusion into Andhra waters. Equipped with high-speed mechanised boats, fishermen from neighbouring regions often venture into these waters during peak fishing seasons, particularly between March and June, when fish movement is high around Pulicat Lake and adjoining stretches.

The Coastal State Governments and Union Territory (UT) Administrations are responsible for regulating fishing activities within Territorial Waters extending up to 12 nautical miles, as this subject falls under Entry 21 of the State List. Accordingly, the coastal States/UTs enforce their respective Marine Fishing Regulation Acts (MFRAs) to govern fishing within territorial waters. States/UTs have also designated exclusive zones for traditional fishers operating non‑motorized and motorized craft, where mechanized vessels are prohibited.

Parallel to state fisheries legislations, around 45 fishing villages depend on the Pulicat lake, lagoon and nearby marine waters for their livelihoods. Pulicat Lake is India's second-largest brackish water lagoon and straddles the states of Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh. Historically, fishing communities on both sides developed customary institutions to regulate access to fishing grounds. One such institution is the Padu system, a traditional rotational system under which villages take turns fishing in designated areas. This system helped prevent overfishing and minimise conflict for generations.

Local fishermen, who largely depend on traditional methods and operate closer to shore, contend these incursions not only deplete fish stocks but also damage their nets, pushing already vulnerable communities into financial distress.

In March 2026, the Government of Andhra Pradesh had again reported occasional incidents of illegal fishing by mechanised vessels from Tamil Nadu and Puducherry within its territorial waters, including in traditional fishing zones and the Pulicat Lake area.

Four mechanised boats allegedly from Tamil Nadu and Puducherry were seized by local fishermen and handed over for custody. However, the boats mysteriously disappeared overnight, reportedly after the detained crew escaped, raising serious questions over enforcement lapses and surveillance gaps.

Recognising the recurring nature of the dispute, the Union Government created Regional Fisheries Management Councils (RFMCs) in 2023 to provide a forum for resolving inter-state fisheries conflicts. Following concerns raised by Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu established a joint district-level committee in 2024 involving officials from: Tiruvallur, Chennai and Chengalpattu (Tamil Nadu), and Tirupati, Nellore and Prakasam (Andhra Pradesh).

However, this incident is part of a recurring pattern. Similar confrontations were reported in 2018, 2021, and 2023, often involving clashes, detentions, and protests. Despite periodic interventions, the absence of a robust, coordinated mechanism between states has allowed the issue to persist.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Demand for compensation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Coastal

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Fishing

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

₹

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Fisheries Department; Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh Government; Regional Fisheries Management Councils

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh Fishermen

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Samrita Shankar
Samrita is an interdisciplinary researcher with an academic background in law and international development. She has previously worked at the science-policy-practice interface on wildlife conservation issues at both the national and international levels. She is particularly interested in themes at the intersection of law/policy, development and resource governance. At Land Conflict Watch, she will contribute to growing body of research, and field-based analysis on coastal resources, commons and livelihoods – with a focus on their intersection with Blue Economy activities.
Show more work
JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us