Uttar Pradesh
Gadanpur, Hichchanpatti, Jigna Karmanpur, Jamua, Jamua Jolha, Hasanpur, Kadipur Harikesh, Jehra Pipri, Manduri, and Baldev Manduri
,
Jamua Hariram
,
Azamgarh
Published :
Mar 2023
|
Updated :
August 31, 2026
Land acquisition, displacement and livelihood impacts of the proposed Azamgarh Airport expansion
Reported by
Saumya Srivastava
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Anmol Gupta, Mukta Joshi
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
160
Households affected
768
People affected
2022
Year started
271.15
ha.
Land area affected
160
Households affected
768
People Affected
2022
Year started
271.15
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Airport
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Unclassifed
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Airport
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In October 2022, the state government of Uttar Pradesh announced a proposal to begin work on expanding Azamgarh Airport. This announcement was made under the Regional Connectivity Scheme (RCS) 'Ude Desh ka Aam Naagrik' (UDAN) scheme launched by the Union Government in 2016. Community members whose land is likely to be acquired for this expansion have been protesting the decision since then.
In July 2022, the government of Uttar Pradesh signed an agreement with the Government of Uttar Pradesh for Operation with the Airport Authority of India (AAI) for the operation of five airports in the state. These include Aligarh, Azamgarh, Chitrakoot, Sonebhadra and Shravasti.
As per the proposed plan for the upgradation and expansion of the Azamgarh airport, 360 acres of land are expected to be acquired in the first phase, while 310 acres are expected in the second phase. Around 2500 individuals stand to lose their houses with the implementation of phase one. Another 25,000 individuals face losing their livelihoods.
In mid October, the Sub Divisional Magistrate, accompanied by the Provincial Armed Constabulary (PAC) officers, arrived at night in Jamuwa Hariram village to conduct the land survey. The team of surveyors was surrounded by the opposing villagers. Following this, the survey team locked the men of the village in their houses and misbehaved with the women and children. Subsequently, farmers of the area who would lose their lands due to the expansion project began a protest in Khiriya bagh area in Azamgarh district. They have named their agitation 'Makan Bachao, Khet Bachao'. 
In January 2023, the district administration had submitted a preliminary survey of the affected land area to the state government. They have been trying to build a consensus with the residents of the area. If the consensus does not come through, they are likely to initiate formal proceedings for land acquisition to implement the project.
As of February 2023, the affected community members continued their protest. In March 2024, the Prime Minister inaugurated the new terminal building of Azamgarh airport. However, the runway facility expansion had been put on hold in light of the continued protest of affected villagers. It was reported that the administration had stopped the process of survey upon the heavy opposition of affected community members, and the project for runway expansion remained in limbo for approximately three years.
In February 2026, it was reported that the administration initiated a fresh survey for runway expansion. As per the report, in accordance with the new survey, 160 houses would be impacted as against more than 1000 that were mentioned to be impacted under the previous survey. The updated survey details were later also shared with the government. 
Further process for expansion of airport runway includes inspection and survey by a technical team of the Airport Authority of India.
Critically, however, six out of seven airports in Uttar Pradesh inaugurated under the UDAN scheme, including Azamgarh Airport, were revealed to have zero operational flights after the inauguration of new terminal buildings, raising questions of planning and viability of building these airports.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Refusal to give up land for the project

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Non-Forest (Grazing Land), Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Dwelling/habitation use

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

₹

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Union Ministry of Civil Aviation, Civil Aviation Department of Government of Uttar Pradesh, Land and Revenue Department of Azamgarh district

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Airport Authority of India

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us