JOIN THE LCW
COMMUNITY

Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, quarterly analytics report, curated expert talks, merchandise and much more. Support our work!

Sign up today

Adani's Kamuthi solar power plant casts shadow on livelihood of locals

Reported by

Viswanathan Sridhar

Legal Review by

Aditya Sharma, Anmol Gupta

Edited by

Anupa Sagar Kujur

Updated by

Published on

February 20, 2024

March 8, 2024

Edited on

February 20, 2024

State

Tamil Nadu

Sector

Power

People Affected by Conflict

Households Affected by Conflict

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

1012

ha

Starting Year

2014

Location of Conflict

Kamuthi

Ramanathapuram

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Renewable Power

Land Conflict Summary

Adani Group built the world's largest solar power plant (as of 2016) in Kamuthi, located in Ramanathapuram district of Tamil Nadu, in record eight months. The project, however, initially met with opposition from locals citing loss of livelihood due to loss of agriculture land. 

Several farmers in Sengapadai, Pudukottai, M Karisalkulam, Mudhal Naadu and Kamudhi villages in Kamuthi taluk say they gave up their fertile lands for the project. A majority of these deals were signed by villagers accompanied by mediators for 'Kamuthi Solar Power Company Limited'. Officials, however, say that only barren lands were being acquired from individuals for the project. Revenue officials said that as of July 2015, 300 acres of land had been acquired in Kamuthi block by the Adani Green Energy (Tamil Nadu) Limited, but they were tightlipped about the price at which it was acquired.

Meanwhile, District Collector K Nandhakumar said that the company acquired the land on lease and ownership basis from private owners so the district administration had nothing to do with it.

Farmers protested against the Adani Group in 2018 alleging that the company failed to fulfil its promise to provide jobs to women who had given them their lands for the solar plant.

They added the fencing off of nearly 4,000 acres by the Adani Group blocked access to grazing grounds, further impacting the economic sustenance of the affected communities. They also said that their access to government lands, including kanmaisooranis (drinking water ponds), streams and water courses, was also blocked.

The construction and operation of the solar plant also raised concerns about the depletion of the groundwater table, compounding the environmental and agricultural challenges faced by the local population. Kamuthi villagers raised a big noise about plunging water levels due to Adani’s operations. Adani was extracting 2,00,000 litres of water daily from a village near the Gundar river.

Following a high-decibel public protest, the company was ordered to stop extracting groundwater from that location. Now, the company desalinates groundwater from its site using reverse osmosis (RO) plants. Experts say that RO plants are energy guzzlers and polluting.

During protests, several allegations related to illegal acquisition of land and violation of acquisition procedures were levelled against the Adani Group. A government order by the Revenue and Land Department stated that the company in its application had mentioned about presence of wetlands in the land to be acquired and the then District Collector of Ramanathapuram had give the 'No Objection Certificate' for the same.

The conflict ended after farmers reached a resolution with the company regarding compensation for affected landowners, and a commitment to follow more transparent and ethical practices in the future. 

The Kamuthi case sheds light on the importance of ethical land acquisition practices in large-scale industrial projects and underscores the need for robust regulatory oversight to safeguard the rights and interests of local communities.

Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand for employment

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Type of Common Land

Non-Forest (Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project completed

Original Project Deadline

2016

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Grazing, Water bodies

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

No

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

4550

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2016

Page Number In Investment Document:

5

Has the Conflict Ended?

Yes

When did it end?

2019

Why did the conflict end?

Community forced to give up their demand by the opposing party

The conflict ended after farmers reached a resolution with the company regarding compensation for affected landowners, and a commitment from the Adani Group to follow more transparent and ethical practices in the future.

Legal Data

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Legislations/Policies Involved

Tamil Nadu Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) Act, 1961
Section 37A [Industries must make an application to the government for permission to hold land in excess of the prescribed ceiling. The government, when deciding whether to grant the permission, must consider the nature of the industrial operation and whether the excess land is required for immediate or future use.]
Central Ground Water Authority Guidelines for issuance of No Objection Certificate (NOC) for ground water withdrawal
Section 3.1.2 [Conditions stipulated for NOC for groundwater withdrawal for mining projects. NOC not to be granted for extraction of groundwater for construction activities in critical/over exploited areas]
Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971
Section 11 [Appropriate government to publish preliminary notification for acquiring land], Section 15 [Affected persons of land notified under Section 11 may submit objections within 60 days. Collector to give objectors an opportunity to be heard and conduct inquiry where necessary]
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013
Section 11 [Appropriate government to publish preliminary notification for acquiring land], Section 15 [Affected persons of land notified under Section 11 may submit objections within 60 days. Collector to give objectors an opportunity to be heard and conduct inquiry where necessary]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

Yes

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

Objections and demands raised under section 11 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

The government gazette notification for land acquisition has been made unavailable for public viewing.

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Controversial land acquisition by the government

Violation of environmental laws

Non-consultation with stakeholders

Legal Status:

Out of Court

Status of Case In Court

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

No

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Case Number

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

No items found.

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

No

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Additional Information

Nature of Protest

Protests/marches

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

District Administration, Tamil Nadu Transmission Corporation (TANTRANSCO)

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Chief Security Officer, Adani Green Energy Private Limited: "The plant functions in five parts and the main plant is 2500 acres and there are other plants in the neighbouring villages totalling upto 4000 acres." Gate Security, Kamuthi Renewable Energy Limited (KREL): "The Adani Group acquired land through a third party attorney in 2014 itself without allowing public to know that lands are being acquired for Adani Group."

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Chief Security Officer, Adani Green Energy Private Limited: "The plant functions in five parts and the main plant is 2500 acres and there are other plants in the neighbouring villages totalling upto 4000 acres." Gate Security, Kamuthi Renewable Energy Limited (KREL): "The Adani Group acquired land through a third party attorney in 2014 itself without allowing public to know that lands are being acquired for Adani Group."

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Yes

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Resources

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Images

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Video

Adani Group built the world's largest solar power plant (as of 2016) in Kamuthi, located in Ramanathapuram district of Tamil Nadu, in record eight months. The project, however, initially met with opposition from locals citing loss of livelihood due to loss of agriculture land. 

Several farmers in Sengapadai, Pudukottai, M Karisalkulam, Mudhal Naadu and Kamudhi villages in Kamuthi taluk say they gave up their fertile lands for the project. A majority of these deals were signed by villagers accompanied by mediators for 'Kamuthi Solar Power Company Limited'. Officials, however, say that only barren lands were being acquired from individuals for the project. Revenue officials said that as of July 2015, 300 acres of land had been acquired in Kamuthi block by the Adani Green Energy (Tamil Nadu) Limited, but they were tightlipped about the price at which it was acquired.

Meanwhile, District Collector K Nandhakumar said that the company acquired the land on lease and ownership basis from private owners so the district administration had nothing to do with it.

Farmers protested against the Adani Group in 2018 alleging that the company failed to fulfil its promise to provide jobs to women who had given them their lands for the solar plant.

They added the fencing off of nearly 4,000 acres by the Adani Group blocked access to grazing grounds, further impacting the economic sustenance of the affected communities. They also said that their access to government lands, including kanmaisooranis (drinking water ponds), streams and water courses, was also blocked.

The construction and operation of the solar plant also raised concerns about the depletion of the groundwater table, compounding the environmental and agricultural challenges faced by the local population. Kamuthi villagers raised a big noise about plunging water levels due to Adani’s operations. Adani was extracting 2,00,000 litres of water daily from a village near the Gundar river.

Following a high-decibel public protest, the company was ordered to stop extracting groundwater from that location. Now, the company desalinates groundwater from its site using reverse osmosis (RO) plants. Experts say that RO plants are energy guzzlers and polluting.

During protests, several allegations related to illegal acquisition of land and violation of acquisition procedures were levelled against the Adani Group. A government order by the Revenue and Land Department stated that the company in its application had mentioned about presence of wetlands in the land to be acquired and the then District Collector of Ramanathapuram had give the 'No Objection Certificate' for the same.

The conflict ended after farmers reached a resolution with the company regarding compensation for affected landowners, and a commitment to follow more transparent and ethical practices in the future. 

The Kamuthi case sheds light on the importance of ethical land acquisition practices in large-scale industrial projects and underscores the need for robust regulatory oversight to safeguard the rights and interests of local communities.

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand for employment

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Type of Common Land

Non-Forest (Grazing Land)

Total investment involved (in Crores):

4550

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2016

Page Number In Investment Document:

5

Has the Conflict Ended?

Yes

When did it end?

2019

Why did the conflict end?

Community forced to give up their demand by the opposing party

The conflict ended after farmers reached a resolution with the company regarding compensation for affected landowners, and a commitment from the Adani Group to follow more transparent and ethical practices in the future.

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Legislations/Policies Involved

Tamil Nadu Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) Act, 1961
Section 37A [Industries must make an application to the government for permission to hold land in excess of the prescribed ceiling. The government, when deciding whether to grant the permission, must consider the nature of the industrial operation and whether the excess land is required for immediate or future use.]
Central Ground Water Authority Guidelines for issuance of No Objection Certificate (NOC) for ground water withdrawal
Section 3.1.2 [Conditions stipulated for NOC for groundwater withdrawal for mining projects. NOC not to be granted for extraction of groundwater for construction activities in critical/over exploited areas]
Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971
Section 11 [Appropriate government to publish preliminary notification for acquiring land], Section 15 [Affected persons of land notified under Section 11 may submit objections within 60 days. Collector to give objectors an opportunity to be heard and conduct inquiry where necessary]
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013
Section 11 [Appropriate government to publish preliminary notification for acquiring land], Section 15 [Affected persons of land notified under Section 11 may submit objections within 60 days. Collector to give objectors an opportunity to be heard and conduct inquiry where necessary]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

Yes

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

Objections and demands raised under section 11 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

The government gazette notification for land acquisition has been made unavailable for public viewing.

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Controversial land acquisition by the government

Violation of environmental laws

Non-consultation with stakeholders

Legal Status:

Out of Court

Status of Case In Court

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

No

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Case Number

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

No items found.

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

No

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Nature of Protest

Protests/marches

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

District Administration, Tamil Nadu Transmission Corporation (TANTRANSCO)

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Chief Security Officer, Adani Green Energy Private Limited: "The plant functions in five parts and the main plant is 2500 acres and there are other plants in the neighbouring villages totalling upto 4000 acres." Gate Security, Kamuthi Renewable Energy Limited (KREL): "The Adani Group acquired land through a third party attorney in 2014 itself without allowing public to know that lands are being acquired for Adani Group."

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Chief Security Officer, Adani Green Energy Private Limited: "The plant functions in five parts and the main plant is 2500 acres and there are other plants in the neighbouring villages totalling upto 4000 acres." Gate Security, Kamuthi Renewable Energy Limited (KREL): "The Adani Group acquired land through a third party attorney in 2014 itself without allowing public to know that lands are being acquired for Adani Group."

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Documented By

Text Link

Reviewed By

Text Link

Updated By

Text Link

Edited By

Text LinkLand Conflict Watch

Other Land Conflicts in Tamil Nadu

cross
Not a member yet?
Sign up now