Hassan Farmers Refuse To Give Up Land for Airport Project in Karnataka

Reported by

Elizabeth ManiLand Conflict Watch

Last updated on

January 27, 2021

Location of Conflict

Boovanahalli

Hassan

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Airport

(

)

People Affected by Conflict

250

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

76

ha

Starting Year

2017

State

Karnataka

Sector

Infrastructure

Farmers and landowners in Boovanahalli village in Tumkur district have opposed the price quoted by the district administration as compensation for the Hassan airport project, which is a joint venture between the Government of Karnataka and Jupiter Aviation Pvt. Ltd on a Build Own Operate Transfer (BOOT) model. The project was first mooted by the Central Public Works Department in 1960, with a land notification being issued in 1969, but there was no progress. It was later revived in 2006-2007 by former Indian Prime Minister H.D. Deve Gowda in the interest of the region's farming sector.

At a meeting between the farmers and the district administration on July 17, 2018, the farmers said they would give up their land for the airport only if the airport authorities provide employment to the local people and pay INR 2 crore per acre as compensation. The district officials offered them a maximum compensation of INR 32 lakh per acre. The farmers claim that some qualified youths from the village wanted to apply for jobs at the airport but were denied entry by the airport authority.

The district authorities had acquired 536 acres of land near Boovanahalli on the outskirts of the city in 2007 and handed it over to Jupiter Aviation. The Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (KIADB) needs additional 189 acres for the project.

KIADB claims that 254 acres of land in four parcels have already been notified for the airport project over a total time period of 12 years. When LCW approached Special Land Acquisition Officer Arun Kumar for comments on the issue, he said he would not be able to share any information since he is not the concerned officer anymore. LCW then tried to contact another Special Land Acquisition Officer, Suresh Kumar, who said he has recently joined the post and was not aware of the issue.

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for more compensation than promised, Refusal to give up land for the project

Region Classification

Urban and Rural

Type of Land

Private

Type of Common Land

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

Total investment involved (in Crores):

110

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Land Acquisition Laws

Legislations/Policies Involved

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community? What was the decision of the concerned government department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Legal Status:

Out of Court

Status of Case In Court

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Case Number

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

Whether criminal law was used against protestors

Official name of the criminal law. Did the case reach trial?

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Nature of Protest

Protests/marches, Refusal of compensation

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of Corporate Authorities Approached

Other Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:
No Images Available

Documented By

Elizabeth Mani

Reviewed By

Elizabeth Mani

Updated By

Elizabeth Mani

Edited By

Elizabeth ManiLand Conflict Watch
X

Support our work

Your contribution ensures continuity of this crucial project.

As a member, you will get exclusive access to special reports, policy papers and research projects undertaken by Land Conflict Watch and behind-the-scenes interactions with the writers and researchers about their work.
Contribute Now