Odisha
Salia Sahi
,
Bhubaneshwar
,
Khorda
Published :
Aug 2021
|
Updated :
April 19, 2026
Eviction, rehabilitation gaps, and tenure rights contestation in the Salia Sahi road expansion project, Bhubaneswar
Reported by
Shazia Nigar
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Bhavesh Seth, Mukta Joshi
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
8000
Households affected
People affected
2020
Year started
ha.
Land area affected
8000
Households affected
People Affected
2020
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Roads
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Unclassifed
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Roads
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
1
Summary

On 19 February 2020, the Bhubaneswar Development Authority (BDA) and the Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporation (BMC) started a demolition drive in the Salia Sahi slum area to construct a six-lane parallel road between Jaydev Vihar and Patia Square in Bhubaneswar. The objective of the government to construct the road is to ease traffic congestion in the city.

The slum dwellers cried foul and claimed that the government did not serve them eviction notices prior to undertaking the demolition drive. The residents protested the move by taking to the streets with placards and shouting slogans. They blocked the roads and stopped the officials and the JCBs from entering their lane to carry out the demolition. They demanded the implementation of the Forest Rights Act and land to build houses. They also demanded that the date of the eviction be postponed so that the children can appear for their exam peacefully.

The police had deployed nine platoons of force to avoid any untoward incident. The residents withdrew their protest after BMC Commissioner Prem Chandra Chaudhary assured them that the eviction drive would be put on hold until the exams were over.  

LCW emailed the Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporation (BMC), the Bhubaneswar Development Authority (BDA) and the Commissionerate of Police for an update, but did not get any response.

Salia Sahi is home to at least 8,000 daily wage labourers. The residents say they do not have any other source of livelihood. According to them, many children in the area were preparing for their higher secondary certificate examination when officials attempted to start the eviction drive.

Sal Marndi, a member of the Salia Sahi Regional Committee (SSRC), told the media, “The BDA and BMC are violating the provisions of the Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006, and the Indian Forest (Amendment) Bill, 2012. Besides, they did not give us prior information about the eviction drive today.”

SSRC President Anjan Nath said that the committee “welcomes the initiatives of the BDA and the BMC. However, they should rehabilitate us before demolishing our houses”.

While land settlement has been started in the Adivasi Colony of the slum under the FRA and Jaga Mission, many areas of the slum have been deprived of this benefit due to lack of environment clearance.

Before the Jaga Mission, the slums had been surveyed under Rajiv Awas Yojana. Later, they were allotted flats under PMAY, but no rights over the property were granted to either the authorised or the unauthorised dwellers.

On 19 October 2025, the BDA and BMC carried out an eviction drive and demolished 29 houses at Salia Sahi for the same project. BDA Liaison Officer said, “The evictees were relocated to affordable housing units at Buddha Nagar, ensuring rehabilitation”.

Many families have been allotted housing units in phases through a lottery system in different Affordable Housing Project (AHP) units, including the Buddha Vihar housing at Chandrasekharpur. However, many residents continue to protest against the demolition drives carried out time to time, demanding land rights and patta issuance rather than AHP units. They said that they should be allotted land not flats as it is forest land.

Meanwhile, government officials assert that their demolition efforts are limited to homes belonging to individuals who have already been allocated AHP units. However, residents contest this claim, stating that homes of those who have not received AHP allocations have also been destroyed.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Refusal to give up land for the project

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to postpone eviction until children's Board exams are complete

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Common

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Bhubaneswar Development Authority, Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporation, Commissionerate of Police

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Yes

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Residents of Salia Sahi, Salia Sahi Regional Committee

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Shazia Nigar
Show more work
Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Refusal to give up land for the project

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us