On December 17, 2019, the Supreme Court directed the government to go ahead with the reclaiming of land for a coastal road project proposed in Mumbai, thereby staying an earlier order by the Bombay High Court. On July 16, 2019, the High Court had set aside the environmental clearance granted to the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) by the Coastal Regulatory Zone Authority for the coastal road project and ordered a halt on the construction work of the road. The court also ordered the BMC to obtain fresh environmental clearance. The 12,000-crore project, proposed in early 2012 by former Maharashtra Chief Minister Prithviraj Chavan, involves the creation of a 35.6-kilometre freeway that will connect Marine Lines in south Mumbai to Kandivali in the north. The project has been in the eye of the storm since. Environmental activists and local residents believe that the project not only exploits the region's marine biodiversity but also puts at risk the livelihoods and homes of the fisherfolk in the area. A petition was filed by the Worli Koliwada Nakhwa and Worli Machimmar Sarvodaya in early February 2019 highlighting issues such as the lack of access to the sea due to reclamation and the loss of breeding grounds of marine animals, affecting about 11,000 people from the fishing community. The project is likely to eat into 75 hectares of open green space and up to 100 metres of the seashore for reclamation. In light of this, the Bombay High Court, on February 28, 2019, had directed the Commissioner of Fisheries to conduct a survey and to hear out the grievances of the fishing communities. The court ordered the BMC and the police to not obstruct any fishing activity in the area. The Bench, led by Chief Justice Naresh Patil and Justice N.M. Jamdar, also ordered the BMC to conduct a meeting with the Commissioner of Fisheries and to submit a report within two weeks. On April 23, the Bombay High Court ordered the BMC to halt work on the project until June 3, 2019. On June 3, the BMC informed the Bombay High Court that it would provide compensation to the fisherfolk affected by the project, the details of which were not disclosed to the public.
Has the Conflict Ended?
When did it end?
Why did the conflict end?
Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict
Land Acquisition Laws
Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute
What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community? What was the decision of the concerned government department?
Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:
Status of Case In Court
Whether any adjudicatory body was approached
Name of the adjudicatory body
Name(s) of the Court(s)
Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:
Whether criminal law was used against protestors
Official name of the criminal law. Did the case reach trial?
Reported Details of the Violation:
Date of Violation
Location of Violation
Nature of Protest
Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:
Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation, Government of Maharashtra, Bombay High Court, Supreme Court
PSUs Involved in the Conflict:
Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?
Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached
Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:
Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?
Name, Designation and Comment of Corporate Authorities Approached
Other Parties Involved in the Conflict: