Punjab
,
Tolewal
,
Sangrur
Published :
Nov 2020
|
Updated :
March 31, 2023
Dalits in Punjab's Sangrur Demand Lease of Shamlat Land at Reduced Rate
Reported by
Damandeep Singh
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
2019
Year started
2
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2019
Year started
2
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Caste-based Conflict
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Caste-based Conflict
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

On June 8, 2019, the Tolewal Gram Sabha (village assembly) in Sangrur district passed a resolution to lease out 5.25 acres of reserved land, or shamlat land (village common land), to the Dalit community for cultivation at an annual rate of INR 500 per acre for 33 years. But the Block Development Panchayat Office (BDPO) that conducts the annual auction of shamlat lands rejected the resolution. The BDPO insisted on the auction at the usual rate of INR 20,000 per acre for one year. The price of Shamlat lands ranges from INR 15,000 to INR 20,000, depending on the location. The Dalits claimed that they cannot afford land at the government’s current rate. They also claimed that any land on which the Gram Sabha passed a resolution could not be auctioned according to the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Rules, 1964.
“The 1964 Rules do not allow shamlat land to be given on lease for more than seven years. Even that can be done only under special circumstances. How can we agree to 33-year fixed leases?” the financial commissioner and administrative secretary of the Department of Rural Development and Panchayat, Anurag Verma, asked the media.
The stalemate affected the livelihood of Dalit families in Tolewal village. They had planned to cultivate paddy on the land, but the uncertainty over the lease rate and period delayed the cultivation and the sowing season got over.
Meanwhile, the auction of the shamlat land is yet to take place. There has been strong opposition from the Zamin Prapti Sangharsh Committee, (ZPSC) which protests every time the auction happens.
In July 2019, one such protest led to a clash in Tolewal village between the Dalits belonging to the ZPSC and another group allegedly comprising upper-caste men in which 10 persons were injured and a FIR (first information report) was issued against 15 individuals.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand for better access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for shamlat land to be leased to Dalits for 33 years at the rate of INR 500 per acre

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

No

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Indian Penal Code, 1860

353 (Assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty), 186 (Obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions), 323 (Punishment for voluntarily causing hurt), 506 (Punishment for criminal intimidation), 148 (Rioting, armed with deadly weapon), 149 (Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed in prosecution of common object), 332 (Voluntarily causing hurt to deter public servant from his duty)

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

The FIR was registered frivolously to counter the complaint filed by the protesting members of the Dalit community. The protesting members suffered physical injuries perpetrated by the upper-caste members of the village. As a result, a complaint was filed against the upper-caste perpetrators. Two individuals from the upper-caste group are currently under arrest, they have been charged under the SC/ST Act. The source from Tolewal stated that the police are aware of the frivolous FIR filed as a countermeasure by the other party, which is why none of the protesting members have been arrested/detained so far. However, it is important to note that the protesting members mentioned in the FIR attached have not been discharged either. The chargesheet has not been filed.

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Beant Singh, Jagsir Singh, Jagtar Singh, Jagmail Singh, Harbans Singh, Kalu Singh, Ranjit Singh, Maya Singh, Kiran Kaur, Sandeep Kaur, Jeet Singh, Bhinder Kaur, Rimpi, Chaanan Singh, Jaspreet Kaur The above are the names of the accused persons in the FIR. The point of contact for the current conflict is Mr Jagtar Singh (he has stated he would like to share the details of himself and other members anonymously)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

Yes

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Community agreed to alternative offers

As a matter of policy, the community's demand could not have been met. The community had demanded that the land be leased for a period of 33 years at a minimal rate, which is not permissible as the cap is understood to be for 3 years each. The current status is that the same plots of land are being renewed in the name of the protesting community every 3 years. So while the initial demand has not been met, there is an understanding that the plots be given to the Dalit community members every 3 years. The current lease period ends in 2025, the plots shall be leased in the community's name once again after 2025.

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Block Developemnt Panchayat Office

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

N/A

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Zamin Prapti Sangharsh Committee

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

No

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Indian Penal Code, 1860

353 (Assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty), 186 (Obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions), 323 (Punishment for voluntarily causing hurt), 506 (Punishment for criminal intimidation), 148 (Rioting, armed with deadly weapon), 149 (Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed in prosecution of common object), 332 (Voluntarily causing hurt to deter public servant from his duty)

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

The FIR was registered frivolously to counter the complaint filed by the protesting members of the Dalit community. The protesting members suffered physical injuries perpetrated by the upper-caste members of the village. As a result, a complaint was filed against the upper-caste perpetrators. Two individuals from the upper-caste group are currently under arrest, they have been charged under the SC/ST Act. The source from Tolewal stated that the police are aware of the frivolous FIR filed as a countermeasure by the other party, which is why none of the protesting members have been arrested/detained so far. However, it is important to note that the protesting members mentioned in the FIR attached have not been discharged either. The chargesheet has not been filed.

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Damandeep Singh

Damandeep is a research scholar in the Department of Political Science, Panjab University, Chandigarh, and Assistant Professor (Political Science) in Trai Shatabdi Guru Gobind Singh Khalsa College, Amritsar. He is interested in understanding the politics of heritage and its impact on contemporary cityscapes. He has completed his Master’s in Political Science from Panjab University.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand for better access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

The FIR was registered frivolously to counter the complaint filed by the protesting members of the Dalit community. The protesting members suffered physical injuries perpetrated by the upper-caste members of the village. As a result, a complaint was filed against the upper-caste perpetrators. Two individuals from the upper-caste group are currently under arrest, they have been charged under the SC/ST Act. The source from Tolewal stated that the police are aware of the frivolous FIR filed as a countermeasure by the other party, which is why none of the protesting members have been arrested/detained so far. However, it is important to note that the protesting members mentioned in the FIR attached have not been discharged either. The chargesheet has not been filed.

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us