Farmers in Assam Resist Land Acquisition for Solar Plant, Beaten by Police

Reported by

Mahesh Deka

Published on

March 31, 2021

March 31, 2021

Updated on

March 31, 2021

Location of Conflict

Mikir Bamuni Grant

Samaguri wetland

Nagaon

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Renewable Power

(

)

People Affected by Conflict

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

38

ha

Starting Year

2020

State

Assam

Sector

Power

More than 100 farmers, along with women and children, in Nagaon district in central Assam have been protesting since January 29, 2021, against forced eviction from their lands. They have alleged that the Nagaon district administration, with the help of police and paramilitary forces, have tried to evict them illegally from their land for setting up a 15megawatt solar power plant at Mikir Bamuni Grant and Lalung Gaon under Samaguri revenue circle by Azure Power Forty Private Limited, a New Delhibased solar power generation company. According to them, the district administration has threatened the farmers, and the police have harassed and arrested some of them for trying to resist the eviction. In October 2020, the police arrested 14 farmers following a fracas with the security personnel of Azure Power. The clash broke out when police started destroying crops. In December 2020, four farmers were arrested on charges of assaulting police personnel. The farmers, however, have said that they were framed and arrested on false charges. After spending more than two months in jail, they got bail on February 22, 2021. The police also allegedly mercilessly beat up women who resisted the land acquisition proceedings. Several women were hurt. "They almost broke my hip with sticks. Not a single policewoman was present there," said Malini Doloi, who sustained serious injuries, in a news report. A 28yearold woman, identified as Champa Timungpi, suffered a miscarriage after the police allegedly kicked in her belly. In 2018, Assam Power Development Corporation Limited selected 38.4 hectares of farmland at Mikir Bamuni Grant and Lalung Gaon for setting up the solar power plant. The contract for the work was awarded to Azure Power in 2019. Subsequently, in March 2020, the power company started the process of land acquisition. The farmers, belonging to Karbi (Scheduled Tribe) and Adivasi communities, admitted that the circle officer of Samaguri had served them a notice for the land acquisition, but they say that not enough time was given to file any written objection. According to them, they received the notice on March 12, 2020, and were asked to register their grievances, if any, before the authorities on March 13. The farmers subsequently moved the Gauhati High Court against the acquisition of their land. The court stayed the eviction on June 24, 2020. But Azure Power appealed against this order, and a fresh notice was issued by the circle officer of Samaguri on July 15. On** **September 30, the Gauhati High Court directed the Nagaon administration to hand over the land to the power company. The farmers again filed a review petition at the Gauhati High Court, to which the court asked them to appeal to the lower courts to resolve the dispute. On October 6, a local court in Nagaon ordered the district administration and the police to not interfere since the land acquisition had become a civil dispute. However, a few days after this order, the company allegedly used bulldozers to destroy crops sown on the land by the 37 families. In May 2021, more than 150 academics, students, lawyers, activists and filmmakers condemned the deployment of CRPF personnel at Mikir Bamuni Grant in the middle of the COVID19 pandemic and demanded their withdrawal. They collected signatures to ask the authorities to stop the construction of the solar plant. Azure Power claims that the company has followed the due process of law while acquiring the land. It said in a statement that necessary permissions were taken and that all land purchases were made through private land deals as the land was originally granted to an erstwhile zamindar's family. The Karbis and Adivasis have been farming on the land for several decades and are solely dependent on it for their livelihood. They obtained possession rights over these lands in 1981 under the Assam (Temporarily Settled Areas) Tenancy Act, 1971. The Act allows a tenant who has held and cultivated a plot of land for more than three years to claim the right of occupancy.

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Private

Type of Common Land

Forest and Non-Forest

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Land Acquisition Laws, Central/State Government Policy, Land Reform Laws

Legislations/Policies Involved

Assam (Temporarily Settled Areas) Tenancy Act, 1971
Section 5 [Acquisition of occupancy rights]
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013
Section 15: [Hearing of objections up to 60 days after the preliminary notification]; Section 21 [Notice to be issued to interested persons]
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
Section 3(1)(g) [This sections makes wrongful dispossession of land of a member of SC or ST punishable]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community? What was the decision of the concerned government department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Controversial land acquisition by the government

Forced evictions/dispossession of land

Non-implementation of land reform laws

Land record discrepancies

Lack of legal protection over land rights

Legal Status:

In Court

Status of Case In Court

Pending

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Gauhati High Court, Court of Judicial Magistrate, District and Sessions Court

Case Number

32/2020, 34/2020 (District and Session Judge Court, Nagaon), 2665/2020 (Gauhati High Court)

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

Arrest/detention/imprisonment

Physical attack

Torture

Other harassment

Whether criminal law was used against protestors

Reported Details of the Violation:

Police officials and security personnel of Azure Power destroyed crops of farmers by running bulldozers over their farms. When the farmers resisted, they were arrested. Even women were beaten up. A pregnant woman suffered miscarriage after the police allegedly kicked her on the stomach. Women protesters were arrested without the presence of female police.

Date of Violation

October 8, 2020

Location of Violation

Mikir Bamuni Grant

Nature of Protest

Protests/marches

Complaints/petitions/letters/memorandums to officials

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Government of Assam; Department of Environment and Forest; Assam Police

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Pranjal Baruah, circle officer, Samaguri Revenue Circle, refused to comment as the matter is sub-judice.

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Pranjal Baruah, circle officer, Samaguri Revenue Circle, refused to comment as the matter is sub-judice.

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Azure Power Forty Private Limited

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

All India Kisan Sabha, Communist Party of India, Congress, Indian People's Theatre Association

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Documented By

Text Link

Reviewed By

Text Link

Updated By

Text Link

Edited By

Text LinkLand Conflict Watch
X

Support our work

Your contribution ensures continuity of this crucial project.

As a member, you will get exclusive access to special reports, policy papers and research projects undertaken by Land Conflict Watch and behind-the-scenes interactions with the writers and researchers about their work.
Contribute Now