Odisha
,
Malsadra
,
Kandhamal
Published : 12 July, 2014   |   Last updated - 24 Jun, 2024
Odisha Forest Department Cuts Trees in Village despite Pending CFR Claims
Reported by
Sanghamitra Dubey
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Updated by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
38
People Affected
2016
Year started
416
Land area affected
Households affected
38
People Affected
2016
Year started
416
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Conservation and Forestry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Forest Administration (Other than Protected Areas)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

As per Section 3(1)(h) of the Forest Rights Act (FRA), the gram sabha (Village Assembly) of the forest villages can file claims for conversion of their village status into revenue village. Forest villages were established in the preIndependence era by the forest department of the states as colonies of laborers for forestry projects. These villages have not been recognised in revenue records, and their residents are deprived of benefits of the welfare schemes routed through the revenue department. Malsadra is a forest village with a small population of nine households under Phulbani block in Kandhamal district. In July 2015, gram sabha members filed claims for conversion into revenue village as well as for recognition of their community forest rights under the FRA and submitted them to the SubDivision Level Committee. However, in March 2016, even before the claims could be decided and titles of rights could be distributed, the forest department cut about 30 sal and teak trees in the village. The previous year too, the department had felled 90100 trees. Forest department officials say tree falling is part of the process prescribed in the working plan. The village residents, however, have been protesting against the ecological degradation. They claim that the forest department's working plan would no longer be applicable on their community forest as their claims under the FRA are still pending. The gram sabha members filed a petition under Section (7) of the FRA and submitted it to the state chief secretary demanding a ban on tree felling in their area and on any interference by the forest department until their FRA claims are pending. However, the forest department managed to uproot most of the trees in the village. The claim for conversion of the forest village into revenue village is still pending. In May 2021, Birendra Kumar Das, project administrator, Kandhamal district, informed LCW that there has been a public proclamation made for the conversion of the village inviting objections but that so far there has been none. Despite the process of marking and demarcation having been slow due to the pandemic, he remarked that the conversion could be completed within the next two or three months.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Author
Reported by
Sanghamitra Dubey

Odisha

Kumar Sambhav is a social entrepreneur and award-winning journalist, leading innovative research in accountability investigations. He is the founder of Land Conflict Watch and is currently working as India Research Lead with Princeton University’s Digital Witness Lab.

Read More

Latest updates
Rajasthan
Rajasthan

UIT Bikaner's Jorbeer Housing Project on Stalls Following Rajasthan High Court Order

Rajasthan
Rajasthan

Jaipur Development Authority Acquires Land for Township Project, Ending Conflict

Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh

Farmers land acquired under Mansarovar Housing Scheme in Lucknow

Maharashtra
Maharashtra

Citizens unite against cycle track around Powai, Vihar Lakes in Mumbai

Jharkhand
Jharkhand

Families displaced by Mandal Dam in Jharkhand opppose project resumption

Jharkhand
Jharkhand

Jharkhand approves Adani's thermal plant, farmers allege violation of LARR Act

Gujarat
Gujarat

Pastoral Community in Gujarat's Banni Grasslands Demands Titles Recognising Community Forest Rights

Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh

Builder Encroaches Upon Farmers Land in Gosaiganj Lucknow, 150 Allottees in Lurch

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Opposition against environmental degradation

Odisha Forest Department Cuts Trees in Village despite Pending CFR Claims

Reported by

Sanghamitra Dubey

Legal Review by

Edited by

Updated by

Updated by

Published on

June 7, 2017

May 17, 2022

Edited on

June 7, 2017

Sector

Conservation and Forestry

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Forest Administration (Other than Protected Areas)

Starting Year

2016

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

416

ha

Households Affected by Conflict

People Affected by Conflict

38

State

Odisha

Sector

Conservation and Forestry

People Affected by Conflict

38

Households Affected by Conflict

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

416

ha

Starting Year

2016

Location of Conflict

Malsadra

Kandhamal

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Forest Administration (Other than Protected Areas)

Land Conflict Summary

As per Section 3(1)(h) of the Forest Rights Act (FRA), the gram sabha (Village Assembly) of the forest villages can file claims for conversion of their village status into revenue village. Forest villages were established in the preIndependence era by the forest department of the states as colonies of laborers for forestry projects. These villages have not been recognised in revenue records, and their residents are deprived of benefits of the welfare schemes routed through the revenue department. Malsadra is a forest village with a small population of nine households under Phulbani block in Kandhamal district. In July 2015, gram sabha members filed claims for conversion into revenue village as well as for recognition of their community forest rights under the FRA and submitted them to the SubDivision Level Committee. However, in March 2016, even before the claims could be decided and titles of rights could be distributed, the forest department cut about 30 sal and teak trees in the village. The previous year too, the department had felled 90100 trees. Forest department officials say tree falling is part of the process prescribed in the working plan. The village residents, however, have been protesting against the ecological degradation. They claim that the forest department's working plan would no longer be applicable on their community forest as their claims under the FRA are still pending. The gram sabha members filed a petition under Section (7) of the FRA and submitted it to the state chief secretary demanding a ban on tree felling in their area and on any interference by the forest department until their FRA claims are pending. However, the forest department managed to uproot most of the trees in the village. The claim for conversion of the forest village into revenue village is still pending. In May 2021, Birendra Kumar Das, project administrator, Kandhamal district, informed LCW that there has been a public proclamation made for the conversion of the village inviting objections but that so far there has been none. Despite the process of marking and demarcation having been slow due to the pandemic, he remarked that the conversion could be completed within the next two or three months.

Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Type of Common Land

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Legal Data

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Forest and Scheduled Area Governance Laws

Legislations/Policies Involved

Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006
Section 3(1)(h) [Provision for conversion of forest villages into revenue villages]; Section 3(1)(i) [Right to protect and conserve community forest resource by forest dwellers]; Section 5 [Forest right holders and gram sabhas are empowered to protect forest resources, wildlife, biodiversity and against activities that affect cultural and natural heritage]; Section 6 [Authorities to vest rights in forest dwellers with initiation from gram sabha regarding the nature and extent of individual and community forest rights and further procedure regarding claims]; Section 7 [Liability and punishment for acts by officer or member of authority or department in contravention of provisions of the Act]
Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
Section 2(iv) [Any clearing of forests to be done with prior approval of the Central government]
Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Rules, 2007
Rule 2A [This rule stipulates the process of identification of hamlets or settlements and their conversion to revenue villages]; Rule 4(a) [Initiate the process of determining the nature and extent of forest rights, receive and hear related claims]; Rule 6 [This provision enlists the functions of the sub-divisional committee, which includes hearing petitions related to resolutions made by gram sabha]; Rule 8 [Functions of the District Level Committee, including hearing petitions against orders passed by the sub-divisional committee]; Rule 14 [Procedure for filing petitions to Sub-Divisional Level Committee]
Ministry of Tribal Affairs Guidelines dated July 12, 2012
Clause (iii)(d) [State governments to take up conversion of forest villages into revenue villages urgently in a time-bound manner]
Government of Odisha Guidelines for conversion of forest villages and settlements into revenue villages, Revenue and Disaster Management Department dated February 2, 2017
Clause 2 [This provision lays down the procedure to be followed for conversion of forest villages into revenue villages]; Clause 3. III. [Any village or habitation on forest that is not a revenue village shall be considered eligible for conversion]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Non-implementation/violation of FRA

Lack of legal protection over land rights

Legal Status:

Out of Court

Status of Case In Court

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

Yes

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Case Number

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

No items found.

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Forest Department

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Resources

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Images

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Video

Other Land Conflicts in Odisha

cross
    Not a member yet?
    Sign up now
    Conflicts Map
    Conflict Database
    About Us