Suru Irrigation Project Threatens To Displace 4 Villages in Jharkhand

Reported by

Connor StaggsLand Conflict Watch

Last updated on

January 26, 2021

Location of Conflict

Chaitanpur Raziama, Redadah and Barsiadah


Seraikela Kharsawan

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Irrigation Dam



People Affected by Conflict


Land Area Affected (in Hectares)







The residents of four villages in Jharkhand's Seraikela-Kharsawan district face the risk of displacement from the Suru Medium Irrigation Project. Under the project, the state's Department of Water Resources plans to irrigate some 4,000 hectares of farmland by building a reservoir on the Suru River. While this would benefit farmers throughout the reservoir's newly irrigated area, the creation of the dam is likely to inundate the neighbouring villages of Chaitanpur, Raziama, Redadah and Barsiadah. The project was conceived in 1982, but work did not begin until 2005. Moreover, the state did not secure the consent of the villagers (need a URL for this), violating the Forest Rights Act, 2006. It has also failed to offer them a resettlement and rehabilitation package. (Again would need the URL) In March 2017, Sujeeta Tudu, a community correspondent for Video Volunteers, a human rights non-profit, documented how the project has affected her community. Protests have been held twice so far, during which at least seven persons have been subjected to tear gas. Seraikela-Kharsawan Land Reform Deputy Collector Kunj Bihari Pandey told Tudu that he was not the concerned authority when the violations happened and that the villagers should submit an application to the appropriate official. The local people have also submitted several Right to Information applications to the district collector to halt the construction of the dam, but they are yet to receive a satisfactory response from the government. Sunalal Munda, one of the affected farmers, said, "We have not received any other land where we can move to." Meanwhile, work on the dam continues in the absence of a clear resettlement and rehabilitation plan from the state. According to the Department of Economic Affairs, only about two per cent of the work was completed as of April 2016. The project now has a revised deadline of December 31, 2019.

Region Classification

Urban and Rural

Type of Land


Private and Common

Type of Common Land

Forest and Non-Forest

Total investment involved (in Crores):


Type of investment:

Land Area Affected
(in Hectares):



Starting Year


Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Government Bodies Involved in the Conflict:

State Water Resources Department; State Revenue, Registration and Land Reforms Department; State Forest Department

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Other Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Video Volunteers

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Support our work

Your contribution ensures continuity of this crucial project.

As a member, you will get exclusive access to special reports, policy papers and research projects undertaken by Land Conflict Watch and behind-the-scenes interactions with the writers and researchers about their work.
Contribute Now