JOIN THE LCW
COMMUNITY

Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, quarterly analytics report, curated expert talks, merchandise and much more. Support our work!

Sign up today

Despite Public Protests, NGT Clears 2,000MW Dam on Subansiri River in Arunachal Pradesh

Reported by

Jyotsna Singh

Legal Review by

Edited by

Updated by

Published on

October 22, 2016

March 7, 2023

Edited on

October 22, 2016

State

Arunachal Pradesh

Sector

Power

People Affected by Conflict

1987

Households Affected by Conflict

414

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

3155

ha

Starting Year

2005

Location of Conflict

Menga

Upper Subansiri

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Hydroelectric Project

Land Conflict Summary

The Subansiri project, a 2,000-megawatt dam, has become a major point of contention between Arunachal Pradesh and Assam. Proposed to be built over a tributary of the Brahmaputra river, the project has been opposed by the local people in both the states.
In 1954, a severe flood obliterated entire towns and villages in Upper Assam. Experts and officials believed the Brahmaputra was causing havoc, and a storage reservoir was proposed as a remedy in 1955. However, the Assam government did not have the budget to take over such a project. In 1982, the Brahmaputra Board was formed by the Centre, which was to be the sole authority on the river.
In 1983, a detailed project report for a rock-fill dam was prepared. It was, however, opposed by the ruling Congress' own chief minister in Arunachal Pradesh, Gegong Apang, who believed that the dam would submerge most of his important constituencies. In 1995, Apang finally relented and consented to the Brahmaputra Board to come up with an 'alternate plan that was more sustainable and entailed lesser displacement'. The Board decided to replace the dam with six smaller ones, with two each in the upper, lower and middle ranges of the Subansiri and Dibang rivers, respectively. Both are tributaries of the Brahmaputra and originate in Arunachal Pradesh. In 2000, the Centre directed the Brahmaputra Board to hand over the project to National Hydro Project Limited (NHPCL).
When NHPCL began construction in 2005, the local people in Arunachal Pradesh took to the streets to protest the project's shoddy Environmental Impact Assessment report.
In December 2011, NHPCL temporarily halted construction, worn down by persistent protests. In 2013, the Assam government's Public Works (Roads) approached the National Green Tribunal (NGT) challenging recommendations for the project, but the court declared that the "only challenge was to safety and downstream impact in the course of operation of the project”.
In 2015, the NGT passed an interim order allowing NHPCL to carry out repair and maintenance work for the safety of the local people. An activist claimed that "the case completely weakened the movement" by allowing construction in the name of repair work."
After several committees and expert panels failed to provide definitive answers about the project, in November 2017, the NGT directed the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change to constitute another committee of expert members to examine the issue. However, Assam Public Works and local activists moved the court stating that the committee was ridden with bias and that there was a clear conflict of interest. They reasoned their claim with the fact that one member was a part of one of the previously failed committees and another was previously employed by the Brahmaputra Board. Ultimately, the committee favoured the project, and in July 2019, the NGT dismissed pleas to reconstitute the committee, paving the way for the resumption of construction work. On December 3, 2019, the Supreme Court dismissed the petition filed by Assam Public Works to review the NGT's order.
The original purpose for the construction of the dam seems to have been defeated as, according to the Thatte-Reddy committee, flood management has been "ignored" by NHPCL and the cascade of smaller now being built cannot control floods to the extent that the original high dam would have.
In December 2020, NHPCL stated that after eight years of being stalled due to protests, the project will be commissioned by March 2022.

Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Type of Common Land

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

11008.3

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2010

Page Number In Investment Document:

9

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Legal Data

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Forest and Scheduled Area Governance Laws, Environmental Laws

Legislations/Policies Involved

Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006
Schedule I, Item 1(c): [Subansiri would be a Category A project requiring mandatory environmental clearance]
Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006
Section 3(1)(a): [Right to live on forestland]; Section 4(1): [Vesting forest rights with traditional forest dwellers]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Violation of environmental laws

Legal Status:

In Court

Status of Case In Court

Disposed

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

Yes

Name of the adjudicatory body

National Green Tribunal - Principle Bench, New Delhi

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Case Number

Original Application No. 346/2013 (EZ)

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

A petition was filed regarding the reconstitution of the committee due to bias. The Tribunal held that there was no such institutional bias and dismissed the petition.

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

No items found.

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Additional Information

Nature of Protest

Blockades

Involvement of national and international NGOs

Complaints/petitions/letters/memorandums to officials

Advocacy (for inclusion in courts)

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Assam Public Works (Roads), Government of Arunachal Pradesh, Brahmaputra Board, Ministry of Power, Minsitry of Water Resources, Central Electricity Authority

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

National Hydro Power Corporation Limited

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

KSK Energy Ventures Limited

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Asom Jatiyatabadi Yuva Chatra Parishad, Affected families, Activists

Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Resources

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Images

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Video

The Subansiri project, a 2,000-megawatt dam, has become a major point of contention between Arunachal Pradesh and Assam. Proposed to be built over a tributary of the Brahmaputra river, the project has been opposed by the local people in both the states.
In 1954, a severe flood obliterated entire towns and villages in Upper Assam. Experts and officials believed the Brahmaputra was causing havoc, and a storage reservoir was proposed as a remedy in 1955. However, the Assam government did not have the budget to take over such a project. In 1982, the Brahmaputra Board was formed by the Centre, which was to be the sole authority on the river.
In 1983, a detailed project report for a rock-fill dam was prepared. It was, however, opposed by the ruling Congress' own chief minister in Arunachal Pradesh, Gegong Apang, who believed that the dam would submerge most of his important constituencies. In 1995, Apang finally relented and consented to the Brahmaputra Board to come up with an 'alternate plan that was more sustainable and entailed lesser displacement'. The Board decided to replace the dam with six smaller ones, with two each in the upper, lower and middle ranges of the Subansiri and Dibang rivers, respectively. Both are tributaries of the Brahmaputra and originate in Arunachal Pradesh. In 2000, the Centre directed the Brahmaputra Board to hand over the project to National Hydro Project Limited (NHPCL).
When NHPCL began construction in 2005, the local people in Arunachal Pradesh took to the streets to protest the project's shoddy Environmental Impact Assessment report.
In December 2011, NHPCL temporarily halted construction, worn down by persistent protests. In 2013, the Assam government's Public Works (Roads) approached the National Green Tribunal (NGT) challenging recommendations for the project, but the court declared that the "only challenge was to safety and downstream impact in the course of operation of the project”.
In 2015, the NGT passed an interim order allowing NHPCL to carry out repair and maintenance work for the safety of the local people. An activist claimed that "the case completely weakened the movement" by allowing construction in the name of repair work."
After several committees and expert panels failed to provide definitive answers about the project, in November 2017, the NGT directed the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change to constitute another committee of expert members to examine the issue. However, Assam Public Works and local activists moved the court stating that the committee was ridden with bias and that there was a clear conflict of interest. They reasoned their claim with the fact that one member was a part of one of the previously failed committees and another was previously employed by the Brahmaputra Board. Ultimately, the committee favoured the project, and in July 2019, the NGT dismissed pleas to reconstitute the committee, paving the way for the resumption of construction work. On December 3, 2019, the Supreme Court dismissed the petition filed by Assam Public Works to review the NGT's order.
The original purpose for the construction of the dam seems to have been defeated as, according to the Thatte-Reddy committee, flood management has been "ignored" by NHPCL and the cascade of smaller now being built cannot control floods to the extent that the original high dam would have.
In December 2020, NHPCL stated that after eight years of being stalled due to protests, the project will be commissioned by March 2022.

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Type of Common Land

Forest

Total investment involved (in Crores):

11008.3

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2010

Page Number In Investment Document:

9

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Forest and Scheduled Area Governance Laws, Environmental Laws

Legislations/Policies Involved

Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006
Schedule I, Item 1(c): [Subansiri would be a Category A project requiring mandatory environmental clearance]
Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006
Section 3(1)(a): [Right to live on forestland]; Section 4(1): [Vesting forest rights with traditional forest dwellers]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Violation of environmental laws

Legal Status:

In Court

Status of Case In Court

Disposed

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

Yes

Name of the adjudicatory body

National Green Tribunal - Principle Bench, New Delhi

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Case Number

Original Application No. 346/2013 (EZ)

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

A petition was filed regarding the reconstitution of the committee due to bias. The Tribunal held that there was no such institutional bias and dismissed the petition.

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

No items found.

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Nature of Protest

Blockades

Involvement of national and international NGOs

Complaints/petitions/letters/memorandums to officials

Advocacy (for inclusion in courts)

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Assam Public Works (Roads), Government of Arunachal Pradesh, Brahmaputra Board, Ministry of Power, Minsitry of Water Resources, Central Electricity Authority

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

National Hydro Power Corporation Limited

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

KSK Energy Ventures Limited

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Asom Jatiyatabadi Yuva Chatra Parishad, Affected families, Activists

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Documented By

Text Link

Reviewed By

Text Link

Updated By

Text Link

Edited By

Text LinkLand Conflict Watch

Other Land Conflicts in Arunachal Pradesh

cross
Not a member yet?
Sign up now