JOIN THE LCW
COMMUNITY

Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, quarterly analytics report, curated expert talks, merchandise and much more. Support our work!

Sign up today

36 Villages in Bihar Demand Revised Compensation for NH-77 Highway

Reported by

Alok

Legal Review by

Edited by

Anupa Sagar Kujur

Updated by

Updated by

Rahul Kumar Gaurav

Published on

September 4, 2016

July 15, 2024

Edited on

September 4, 2016

Sector

Infrastructure

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Roads

Starting Year

2011

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

50

ha

Households Affected by Conflict

People Affected by Conflict

2000

State

Bihar

Sector

Infrastructure

People Affected by Conflict

2000

Households Affected by Conflict

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

50

ha

Starting Year

2011

Location of Conflict

Sakri, Madhol, Kafen, Balia, Vishunpur and Turki villages

Muzaffarpur

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Roads

Land Conflict Summary

Residents of 36 villages, whose land was earmarked by the state government for four laning of the Patna-Hajipur-Muzaffarpur section of National Highway-77, have refused to sell their land at the offered rate of compensation, demanding a better package.
In 2011, farmers belonging to Sakri, Madhol, Kafen, Balia, Vishunpur and Turki villages, adjacent to NH-77, agitated to receive compensation at the rate for commercial land under the banner of Kisan Sangharsh Morcha, temporarily halting the construction work at the site.
In 2016, there was a row over 123 hectares of land for the land acquisition process. Residents of the affected villages claim that officials and middlemen misled them about the category of land. According to them, even though their land was procured under the agricultural category, they calculated compensation for the land according to the residential and commercial category, which is notably higher than the amount paid for agricultural land. Tirhut Divisional Commissioner Atul Prasad constituted a six-member committee to resolve the issue. Muzaffarpur Land Procurement Officer A.K. Thakur remarked that the compensation would be decided once the committee submits its report.
In [2018](https://www.jagran.com/bihar/muzaffarpur-the-new-proposal-of-the-minister-to-end-the-resistance-in-nh-77-construction-18704193.html#:~:text=एक नजर में परियोजना,रुपये वितरित कर दिए गए।), in an attempt to speed up the project, State Road Construction Minister Nand Kishore Yadav held a meeting with the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) officials and landholders from the 36 villages. He placed before them a [new proposal](https://www.jagran.com/bihar/muzaffarpur-the-new-proposal-of-the-minister-to-end-the-resistance-in-nh-77-construction-18704193.html#:~:text=एक नजर में परियोजना,रुपये वितरित कर दिए गए।) for compensation which would pay two and a half times the amount of Minimum Value Register (MVR) for 26 villages and four times the MVR for the remaining 10, along with interest. However, neither the landholders nor the NHAI fully agreed to the proposal, with the latter refusing to approve the funds until a state-level committee on objections was constituted by the principal secretary, Department of Road Construction.
A news report in 2019 noted that after negotiations between the farmers and Yadav, the compensation amount was fixed along with interest rates of nine per cent, 15 per cent and 20 per cent and was to be notified as such. However, the residents of Madhubani village were irked by this as they had not agreed to the compensation amount at the meeting with NHAI officials.
In 2021, noting the inordinate delays in land acquisition for major road projects in Bihar, the Patna high court ordered that all the national highways in the state should be monitored to ensure they have passed all necessary orders. The NHAI, meanwhile, sanctioned ₹11,327.45 crore as payment for land acquisition for various road projects in Bihar.

As of August 2023, the required land has been acquired, but the distribution of land compensation has not completed. Also, the mutation of the acquired land has not been done in the name of the President of India. On the request of NHAI, the district administration was directed to distribute land compensation after reviewing it at the level of Chief Secretary.

In 2023, Deputy Chief Minister Tejaswi Prasad Yadav requested Union Road Transport and Highways Minister Nitin Gadkari to construct Muzaffarpur bypass in Hajipur-Muzaffarpur NH-77 in Bihar. To this, Gadkari directed the officials to complete the work quickly.

The construction of NH-77 in Bihar was estimated to be completed in November 2023.

Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for more compensation than promised

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Private

Type of Common Land

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

2024

Whether the Project has been Delayed

No

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area, Agricultural land, Commercial

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

672

Type of investment:

Revised Investment

Year of Estimation

2005

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Legal Data

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Land Acquisition Laws

Legislations/Policies Involved

Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Section 23 [Matters to be considered while determining compensation includes market value, compensation for damage and for change of residence/business]; Section 30 [Collector may refer any dispute on compensation to court]
National Highways Act, 1956
Section 3A [Union governemnt can declare intent to acquire land for public purpose necessary for the construction or maintenance of a national highway]; Section 3G [Determination of the amount payable as compensation, accounting for the market value of the land and the damage done]
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013
Section 24(1) [When an award under Section 11 has already been given, then the provisions of the 1894 Act would apply]
State of Mizoram Act, 1986
Section 3 [Establishment of Mizoram as a new state comprising the territories that were part of the Union Territory of Mizoram]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Incorrect estimation of compensation

Controversial land acquisition by the government

Non-payment of compensation/promised compensation

Non-implementation/violation of LARR Act

Legal Status:

In Court

Status of Case In Court

Pending

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

High Court of Bihar at Patna

Case Number

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8900 of 2020, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10640 of 2013

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

In 2013, petitions were filed before the high court by land owners who alleged that the rate of compensation has not been estimated correctly and that the land in question is commercial land. On October 17, 2014, the high court disposed of the petitions by ordering the petitioners to file representations before the Competent Authority, who must give a reasoned order. In 2020, the court directed the registration of a separate petition to monitor the progress of the 29 National Highway projects in Bihar. As per the affidavit filed by the National Highways Authority of India, the NH-77 project (Muzaffarpur-Hajipur) has been completed, and on March 2, 2021, the court held that it does not require monitoring. The main petition is still pending.

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

No items found.

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Additional Information

Nature of Protest

Complaints/petitions/letters/memorandums to officials

Development of a network or collective

Refusal of compensation

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

National Highways Authority of India (NHAI)

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Kisan Sangharsh Morcha

Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Resources

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Images

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Video

Residents of 36 villages, whose land was earmarked by the state government for four laning of the Patna-Hajipur-Muzaffarpur section of National Highway-77, have refused to sell their land at the offered rate of compensation, demanding a better package.
In 2011, farmers belonging to Sakri, Madhol, Kafen, Balia, Vishunpur and Turki villages, adjacent to NH-77, agitated to receive compensation at the rate for commercial land under the banner of Kisan Sangharsh Morcha, temporarily halting the construction work at the site.
In 2016, there was a row over 123 hectares of land for the land acquisition process. Residents of the affected villages claim that officials and middlemen misled them about the category of land. According to them, even though their land was procured under the agricultural category, they calculated compensation for the land according to the residential and commercial category, which is notably higher than the amount paid for agricultural land. Tirhut Divisional Commissioner Atul Prasad constituted a six-member committee to resolve the issue. Muzaffarpur Land Procurement Officer A.K. Thakur remarked that the compensation would be decided once the committee submits its report.
In [2018](https://www.jagran.com/bihar/muzaffarpur-the-new-proposal-of-the-minister-to-end-the-resistance-in-nh-77-construction-18704193.html#:~:text=एक नजर में परियोजना,रुपये वितरित कर दिए गए।), in an attempt to speed up the project, State Road Construction Minister Nand Kishore Yadav held a meeting with the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) officials and landholders from the 36 villages. He placed before them a [new proposal](https://www.jagran.com/bihar/muzaffarpur-the-new-proposal-of-the-minister-to-end-the-resistance-in-nh-77-construction-18704193.html#:~:text=एक नजर में परियोजना,रुपये वितरित कर दिए गए।) for compensation which would pay two and a half times the amount of Minimum Value Register (MVR) for 26 villages and four times the MVR for the remaining 10, along with interest. However, neither the landholders nor the NHAI fully agreed to the proposal, with the latter refusing to approve the funds until a state-level committee on objections was constituted by the principal secretary, Department of Road Construction.
A news report in 2019 noted that after negotiations between the farmers and Yadav, the compensation amount was fixed along with interest rates of nine per cent, 15 per cent and 20 per cent and was to be notified as such. However, the residents of Madhubani village were irked by this as they had not agreed to the compensation amount at the meeting with NHAI officials.
In 2021, noting the inordinate delays in land acquisition for major road projects in Bihar, the Patna high court ordered that all the national highways in the state should be monitored to ensure they have passed all necessary orders. The NHAI, meanwhile, sanctioned ₹11,327.45 crore as payment for land acquisition for various road projects in Bihar.

As of August 2023, the required land has been acquired, but the distribution of land compensation has not completed. Also, the mutation of the acquired land has not been done in the name of the President of India. On the request of NHAI, the district administration was directed to distribute land compensation after reviewing it at the level of Chief Secretary.

In 2023, Deputy Chief Minister Tejaswi Prasad Yadav requested Union Road Transport and Highways Minister Nitin Gadkari to construct Muzaffarpur bypass in Hajipur-Muzaffarpur NH-77 in Bihar. To this, Gadkari directed the officials to complete the work quickly.

The construction of NH-77 in Bihar was estimated to be completed in November 2023.

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for more compensation than promised

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Private

Type of Common Land

Total investment involved (in Crores):

672

Type of investment:

Revised Investment

Year of Estimation

2005

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Land Acquisition Laws

Legislations/Policies Involved

Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Section 23 [Matters to be considered while determining compensation includes market value, compensation for damage and for change of residence/business]; Section 30 [Collector may refer any dispute on compensation to court]
National Highways Act, 1956
Section 3A [Union governemnt can declare intent to acquire land for public purpose necessary for the construction or maintenance of a national highway]; Section 3G [Determination of the amount payable as compensation, accounting for the market value of the land and the damage done]
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013
Section 24(1) [When an award under Section 11 has already been given, then the provisions of the 1894 Act would apply]
State of Mizoram Act, 1986
Section 3 [Establishment of Mizoram as a new state comprising the territories that were part of the Union Territory of Mizoram]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Incorrect estimation of compensation

Controversial land acquisition by the government

Non-payment of compensation/promised compensation

Non-implementation/violation of LARR Act

Legal Status:

In Court

Status of Case In Court

Pending

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

High Court of Bihar at Patna

Case Number

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8900 of 2020, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10640 of 2013

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

In 2013, petitions were filed before the high court by land owners who alleged that the rate of compensation has not been estimated correctly and that the land in question is commercial land. On October 17, 2014, the high court disposed of the petitions by ordering the petitioners to file representations before the Competent Authority, who must give a reasoned order. In 2020, the court directed the registration of a separate petition to monitor the progress of the 29 National Highway projects in Bihar. As per the affidavit filed by the National Highways Authority of India, the NH-77 project (Muzaffarpur-Hajipur) has been completed, and on March 2, 2021, the court held that it does not require monitoring. The main petition is still pending.

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

No items found.

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Nature of Protest

Complaints/petitions/letters/memorandums to officials

Development of a network or collective

Refusal of compensation

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

National Highways Authority of India (NHAI)

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Kisan Sangharsh Morcha

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Documented By

Text Link

Reviewed By

Text Link

Updated By

Text Link

Edited By

Text LinkLand Conflict Watch

Other Land Conflicts in Bihar

cross
Not a member yet?
Sign up now