Assam
Gunjung, Guliabra, Delaisa, Diyungmukh; Haflong Tiniali, Lower Haflong via Diyungmukh
,
Haflong
,
Dima Hasao
Published :
Feb 2023
|
Updated :
July 8, 2026
Land acquisition for Asom Mala road project in Dima Hasao of Assam triggers compensation dispute
Reported by
East Street Journal Asia
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Anmol Gupta, Mukta Joshi
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
834
Households affected
692
People affected
2022
Year started
219.29
ha.
Land area affected
834
Households affected
692
People Affected
2022
Year started
219.29
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Roads
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Unclassifed
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Roads
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In October 2022, residents from multiple villages in Haflong, Assam, submitted a memorandum to the Prime Minister of India demanding compensation for land acquired for the Asom (or Axom) Mala road project. Submitted through the Deputy Commissioner's office of Dima Hasao, it concerned the two-way road project connecting Haflong to Lower Haflong via Diyungmukh. Opposition to the project intensified after Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman laid the foundation stone for the 90.92-km road, as residents raised concerns over land acquisition and compensation.
Funded by the Asian Development Bank (ADB), this project is part of the Assam state government's plans to improve various state highways and major district roads. The state government had initiated the acquisition of land for the project through the Public Works Department (PWD) through the Assam Land Acquisition (Direct Purchase) Policy, 2021.
Residents argued that acquisition through the Direct Purchase Policy bypassed safeguards relating to land assessment and compensation available under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act 2013. (RFCTLARR).

In September and November 2021, several families moved the Gauhati High Court to demand that proper land acquisition procedures be followed. Petitioners alleged that they had not received adequate compensation for their acquired land.
Affected families have also alleged inconsistencies in the compensation distribution, with some people who have fewer lands receiving disproportionately high compensation. While others who own higher amounts of land have received low compensation.
Residents have alleged that authorities have included their land in the list of land required for the construction of the project without making a proper assessment of the land required, nor initiating formal land acquisition proceedings. 

On November 1, 2022, the court disposed of the cases, directing the PWD Chief Engineer to address representations on compensation, but the project proceeded without a halt. As of April 2025, the co-financed project reported 169 grievances, with 158 resolved, though specifics for Dima Hasao remain unclear per Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) updates. The Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) reviewed earlier land acquisition practices under the Asom Mala project and identified concerns related to compensation, land tenure, and stakeholder engagement.

A June 2025 Resettlement Action Plan for the related Assam Disaster Resilience Hill Area Road Development Project (ADRHARDP) reveals that earlier land acquisitions under Asom Mala followed traditional policies and provided inadequate rehabilitation, leading to community discontent. Government documents also describe the compensation mechanism adopted for affected households. According to a PWD Assam Report, “The affected usufruct titleholders and tenants receive compensation via NCHAC disbursement through Gaon Bura.” A May 2025 World Bank Stakeholder Engagement Plan also noted that unresolved land ownership and tenure issues in autonomous areas continue to complicate compensation and land acquisition processes.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for compensation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Proper assessment of land required and initiation of formal acquisition proceeding

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Private

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

No

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Non-agri rural enterprise, Agricultural land, Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

No

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

662.41

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2022

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Assam Public works Department (PWD) (Roads), Project management Unit (PMU)

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Yes

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

The researcher contacted the Project Officer, South Asia Department, ADB, Tanaka Yasushi, requesting a status update and an enquiry for the due compensation to be received by the affected people of the villages whose land falls under the road project area.

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Asian Development Bank (ADB)Asian Development Bank (ADB)

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Yes

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Residents of Gunjung, Guliabra, Delaisa, Diyungmukh villages

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
East Street Journal Asia

East Street Journal Asia is a multilingual, Web-based news journal. It is an independent media organisation whose goal is to make transparent, unbiased and data-driven journalism accessible to all.

Show more work
Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for compensation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

No

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Non-agri rural enterprise, Agricultural land, Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

No

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us