September 13, 2019
September 13, 2019
September 13, 2019
The residents of Usgao village in Goa have opposed the expansion of the MRF Tubes and Tyre Factory in their village. According to them, the existing unit, which was set up in 1971, has been a source of air pollution. They believe the proposed expansion will exert pressure on the natural resources in the area, besides affecting public health and the quality of life. There is already rampant industrial activity in the vicinity resulting from three other industrial plants Nestle, Finolex and Devyani Foods. Another major concern of the residents is that the location of the factory and expansion site is adjacent to Khandepar river, a major source of water for the village residents as well as for the Opa Water Works, which supplies water to almost 40 per cent of Goa. The expansion proposal states that the project will require 0.35 million litres of water per day from Khandepar river. A study of all government documents by environmental nonprofit Goa Foundation, submitted by MRF to the court, reveals that no environmental study has been carried out before the site was chosen for the expansion. The expansion proposal was approved by the Goa Investment Promotion and Facilitation Board in 2015, following which other authorities, such as the Town and Country Planning Department, granted the required permissions. The panchayat, on the other hand, had passed two resolutions on March 28 and November 20 in 2016 rejecting the expansion of the plant. In January 2017, a large number of coconut and other trees were felled at the site. This prompted the residents to immediately approach the authorities to take action against the tree felling and development work. In May 2018, the Dhatwada Usgao Citizens Forum, a civil society group, along with the Goa Foundation, filed a public interest litigation before the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the permissions granted for the expansion and seeking a stay order on construction activities and development work that had commenced. On September 11, 2019, the high court directed MRF to stop work at the site. The case is now in its final stage of hearing.
Refusal to give up land for the project
Opposition against environmental degradation
Total investment involved (in Crores):
Type of investment:
Year of Estimation
Page Number In Investment Document:
Has the Conflict Ended?
When did it end?
Why did the conflict end?
Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict
Other, Environmental Laws
Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute
What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community? What was the decision of the concerned government department?
Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:
Status of Case In Court
Whether any adjudicatory body was approached
What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?
Name of the adjudicatory body
Name(s) of the Court(s)
High Court of Bombay at Goa
PIL WP 17/2018
Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:
Whether criminal law was used against protestors
Reported Details of the Violation:
Date of Violation
Location of Violation
Nature of Protest
Development of a network or collective
Advocacy (for inclusion in courts)
Complaints/petitions/letters/memorandums to officials
Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:
Goa Investment Promotion and Facilitation Board, Goa Town and Country Planning Department, Directorate of Mines and Geology, Department of Water Resources, Goa State Pollution Control Board
PSUs Involved in the Conflict:
Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?
Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached
Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:
MRF Private Limited (Madras Rubber Factory)
Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?
Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:
Goa Foundation, Dhatwada Usgao Citizens Forum