Tripura
Manu Manpui
,
Kanchanpur
,
North Tripura
Published : 12 July, 2014   |   Last updated - 24 Jun, 2024
North Tripura's Kanchanpur protests land encroachment by surrendered militants amid rehabilitation crisis
Reported by
East Street Journal Asia
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Updated by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
1275
People Affected
2023
Year started
11
Land area affected
Households affected
1275
People Affected
2023
Year started
11
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Encroachment by Non-Right Holders (Other than Caste-based)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Locals of the Kanchanpur sub-division in North Tripura district protested against encroachments by members of different surrendered militants groups in the reserve forest areas and revenue land belonging to the state Revenue Department in Manu-Manpui.
Locals said the encroachment is in two specific areas: a) along the Manu-Manpui bypass road that connects the Kanchanpur sub-division with Manu and b) the area adjacent to the Kanchanpur-Machmara road.
On April 18, people who were given leases and land pattas under the Forest Rights Act staged a protest demanding the land to be vacated. Protesters demanded the eviction of the settlers from the forest area, while the settlers demanded rehabilitation and houses in exchange for vacating the land.
A total of 1275 members occupied 28 acres of land in the area, according to a report by The Tripura Post. However, there is no official figure available for the number of tribals who were affected due to the incident.
One of the protesters said, “A large group of surrendered militants have installed bamboo structures inside the Reserved Forest areas and also arbitrarily occupied lands of local tribal communities who had been allowed to use the land on a patta agreement. Even though SDM Kanchanpur Rajat Pant warned encroachers to stop construction in the forest land, they refused to halt construction.”
Following the protest, the Chief Minister of Tripura Manik Saha held a high-level meeting with senior officials, including the District Magistrate of North Tripura G Nagesh Kumar, at the secretariat.
On April 19, the ex-militants halted the construction in the area after the CM ordered the district officials to start a verification process for all the families demanding rehabilitation. The CM ordered the district administration to collect names, addresses, past records and other details of the people who had settled down in the area to expedite the land rehabilitation and allotment process.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973

Section 144 [The district magistrate has the power to issue orders to prevent obstruction, injury, or danger to human life. Orders can be issued to prevent public gatherings and suspend internet connection to prevent further violence]

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Government or community-regulated urban commons

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Author
Reported by
East Street Journal Asia

Tripura

Kumar Sambhav is a social entrepreneur and award-winning journalist, leading innovative research in accountability investigations. He is the founder of Land Conflict Watch and is currently working as India Research Lead with Princeton University’s Digital Witness Lab.

Read More

Latest updates
Arunachal Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh

Hydroelectric projects on Subansiri river continue despite public outcry, disasters, and persistent floods

Gujarat
Gujarat

Farmers divided over Mandal-Becharaji Special Investment region in Gujarat

Gujarat
Gujarat

Farmers protest against GIDC in Gujarat, demand promised jobs, compensation

Goa
Goa

Proposed construction in Goa village blocks residents' access to agricultural fields, river

Assam
Assam

Violence erupts in Dhemaji amid ongoing Assam-Arunachal border dispute

Odisha
Odisha

Odisha's Dungripali village protests Aditya Birla solar power project

Assam
Assam

Illegal coal mining continues to thrive in Assam's Tinsukia

Assam
Assam

5 Cops Killed, 60 Civilians Injured in Firing between Assam, Mizoram Police

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

North Tripura's Kanchanpur protests land encroachment by surrendered militants amid rehabilitation crisis

Reported by

East Street Journal Asia

Legal Review by

Priyansha Chouhan, Anmol Gupta

Edited by

Anupa Sagar Kujur

Updated by

Updated by

Published on

November 9, 2023

December 11, 2023

Edited on

November 9, 2023

Sector

Land Use

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Encroachment by Non-Right Holders (Other than Caste-based)

Starting Year

2023

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

11

ha

Households Affected by Conflict

People Affected by Conflict

1275

State

Tripura

Sector

Land Use

People Affected by Conflict

1275

Households Affected by Conflict

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

11

ha

Starting Year

2023

Location of Conflict

Kanchanpur

Manu Manpui

North Tripura

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Encroachment by Non-Right Holders (Other than Caste-based)

Land Conflict Summary

Locals of the Kanchanpur sub-division in North Tripura district protested against encroachments by members of different surrendered militants groups in the reserve forest areas and revenue land belonging to the state Revenue Department in Manu-Manpui.
Locals said the encroachment is in two specific areas: a) along the Manu-Manpui bypass road that connects the Kanchanpur sub-division with Manu and b) the area adjacent to the Kanchanpur-Machmara road.
On April 18, people who were given leases and land pattas under the Forest Rights Act staged a protest demanding the land to be vacated. Protesters demanded the eviction of the settlers from the forest area, while the settlers demanded rehabilitation and houses in exchange for vacating the land.
A total of 1275 members occupied 28 acres of land in the area, according to a report by The Tripura Post. However, there is no official figure available for the number of tribals who were affected due to the incident.
One of the protesters said, “A large group of surrendered militants have installed bamboo structures inside the Reserved Forest areas and also arbitrarily occupied lands of local tribal communities who had been allowed to use the land on a patta agreement. Even though SDM Kanchanpur Rajat Pant warned encroachers to stop construction in the forest land, they refused to halt construction.”
Following the protest, the Chief Minister of Tripura Manik Saha held a high-level meeting with senior officials, including the District Magistrate of North Tripura G Nagesh Kumar, at the secretariat.
On April 19, the ex-militants halted the construction in the area after the CM ordered the district officials to start a verification process for all the families demanding rehabilitation. The CM ordered the district administration to collect names, addresses, past records and other details of the people who had settled down in the area to expedite the land rehabilitation and allotment process.

Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Type of Common Land

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973

Section 144 [The district magistrate has the power to issue orders to prevent obstruction, injury, or danger to human life. Orders can be issued to prevent public gatherings and suspend internet connection to prevent further violence]

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Government or community-regulated urban commons

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Legal Data

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Legislations/Policies Involved

Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006
Section 3(1)(a) [Forest rights of forest-dwelling tribes include the right to hold and live in the forestland as recognized.] Section 4(5) [Forest-dwelling tribes may not be removed from occupied forestland before registration and verification process is complete]
Tripura Land Revenue and Land Reforms Act, 1960
Section 14 [Collector may allot land belonging to government for agriculture or construction of dwelling houses] Section 138 [Any dispute regarding the possession of any land shall be decided by the Collector after conducting inquiry]
No. 6/16/2017-NE.I - Revised Scheme for Surrender-cum-Rehabilitation of Militants in the North East, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, April 1, 2018
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

No

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Lack of legal protection over land rights

Non-implementation/violation of FRA

Legal Status:

Out of Court

Status of Case In Court

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

No

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Case Number

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

No items found.

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Additional Information

Nature of Protest

Protests/marches

Complaints/petitions/letters/memorandums to officials

Blockades

Land occupation

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Sub Divisional Magistrate (North), Sub Divisional Magistrate (Kanchanpur), Tripura Home Department, Tripura Revenue Department, Tripura Forest Department, North Tripura District Administration, Principal Chief Conservator of Forest & Head of Forest Force (PCCF & HoFF), Tripura

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Deprived Returnees Movement Committee (DMRC), Tripura United Indigenous Returnees People’s Council (TUIRPC)

Protests/marches
Complaints/petitions/letters/memorandums to officials
Blockades
Land occupation

Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973

Section 144 [The district magistrate has the power to issue orders to prevent obstruction, injury, or danger to human life. Orders can be issued to prevent public gatherings and suspend internet connection to prevent further violence]

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Resources

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Images

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Video

Other Land Conflicts in Tripura

cross
    Not a member yet?
    Sign up now